• 대한한의학원전학회지
• /
• 제18권1호통권28호
• /
• pp.121-136
• /
• 2005

통적연구진사탁적장부오행병리급잡병오행병리적운용연구(通適硏究陳士鐸的臟腑五行病理及雜病五行病理的運用硏究), 득출이하결론(得出以下結論) : 진사탁인위진관폐금극간목(陳士鐸認爲盡管肺金克肝木), 단시약간중지화왕성(但是若肝中之火旺盛), 칙폐무법극간차치간화극토사장토수손(則肺無法克肝且致肝火克土使將土受損), 종이사비위무법생금이치폐금갱가쇠약(從而使脾胃無法生金而致肺金更加衰弱), 폐불능생수이수무법극화(肺不能生水而水無法克火), 도치상중하삼초지화균과왕(導致上中下三焦之火均過旺). 타인위간희소설(他認爲肝喜疏泄), 당약울체회사기극비위(?若鬱滯會使其克脾胃), 비위수극칙토극수(脾胃受克則土克水), 이신수손무법생목(而腎受損無法生木), 사간울갱심심화무법화생(使肝鬱更甚心火無法化生), 차폐역무법극목(且肺亦無法克木). 차시(此時), 응이해울법내치료(應以解鬱法來治療). 타인위수연토극수(他認爲雖然土克水), 단시토생수여금생수적관계갱위밀절(但是土生水與金生水的關係更爲密切), 이폐여신우위밀절차유상생적관계(而肺與腎尤爲密切且有相生的關係), 고지유신중지수충족(故只有腎中之水充足), 방가수화기제(方可水火旣濟). 타인위심위군화시유형지화(他認爲心爲君火是有形之火), 가용수극지(可用水克之), 이신중지화위무형지화(而腎中之火爲無形之火), 차가양수(且可養水). 타인위명문지화가생비토(他認爲命門之火可生脾土), 단약과왕칙무법생비토반이극토(但若過旺則無法生脾土反而克土). 차시(此時), 여기직접보신수(與其直接補腎水), 불여보폐금사금생수(不如補肺金使金生水), 차위보수적근본지법(此爲補水的根本之法). 진사탁재설명오장적병리기제시인위(陳士鐸在說明五臟的病理機制時認爲), 오장지화과왕칙회사상생관계변성상극관계(五臟之火過旺則會使相生關係變成相克關係), 이적의적화칙능유지정상적상생관계(而適宜的火則能維持正常的相生關係), 차즉사화불족역가유지상생(且卽使火不足亦可維持相生). 진사탁인위제료외감(陳士鐸認爲除了外感), 기호소유적잡병도이장부오행적상생(幾乎所有的雜病都以臟腑五行的相生), 상극(相克), 이급상관적관계위중심내설명료기병리(以及相關的關係爲中心來說明了其病理), 저일점성위료기학술사상적중요특점(這一點成爲了其學術思想的重要特點).

• 대한한의학원전학회지
• /
• 제18권1호통권28호
• /
• pp.94-120
• /
• 2005

통과연구진사탁적현존팔종의서(通過硏究陳士鐸的現存八種醫書), 득출이하결론(得出以下結論): 인위석실비록시화타소저청낭서적복원본(認爲石室秘?是華?所著靑囊書的復原本), 이기백전급진사탁적시장중경보충설명완성적서적(而岐伯傳給陳士鐸的是張仲景補充說明完成的書籍). 본초신편재약271종(本草新篇載藥271種), 기술료종기백(記述了從岐伯), 장중경(張仲景), 편작소전수적내용(扁鵲所傳授的內容), 단재범예급서문중(但在範例及序文中), 견불도여편작상관적내용(見不到與扁鵲相關的內容). 변증기문여변증녹기술료기호상동적내용(辨證奇聞與辨證錄記述了幾乎相同的內容), 단무유관병인(但無有關病因), 맥진(脈診), 설진등방면적내용(舌診等方面的內容), 제외감이외(除外感以外), 대잡병병리기호도시이오장오행이론위의거진행료설명(對雜病病理幾乎都是以五臟五行理論爲依據進行了說明). 변증옥함기호미재세간류전(辨證玉函幾乎未在世間流傳), 근류전유일종판본(僅流傳有一種版本), 차파음양(且把陰陽), 허실(虛實), 상하(上下), 진가작위기구별질병적강요(眞假作爲其區別疾病的綱要). 맥결천미거설시귀여구소전(脈訣闡微據說是鬼與區所傳), 인기내용교소미단독간행(因其內容較少未單獨刊行), 근부어변증녹지후보충료변증방면적불족지처(僅符於辨?錄之後補充了辨證方面的不足之處). 거인위외경미언시진사탁종선사소수전적서중최위기리적서적(據認爲外經微言是陳士鐸從先師所授傳的書中最爲奇異的書籍), 시일본집진사탁의학사상지대성적전저(是一本集陳士鐸醫學思想之大成的專著). 동천오지시진사탁적외과전저(洞天奧旨是陳士鐸的外科專著), 재림상극소응용도침지법(在臨床極少應用刀針之法), 이책용료이중제위대보내소법(而策用了以重劑爲大補內消法), 계승료사전급가전적비방(繼承了師傳及家傳的秘方), 이차종합료력대외과저작적내용(而且綜合了曆代外科著作的內容).

• 대한한의학원전학회지
• /
• 제18권3호통권30호
• /
• pp.207-212
• /
• 2005

통과대진사탁명문지설특징적연구득출이하결론(通過對陳士鐸命門之說特徵的硏究得出以下結論): 1. 명문위선천지화(命門爲先天之火), 차종개념상역가위선천지수화(且從槪念上亦可爲先天之水火). 2. 명문지화가칭지위선천지화(命門之火可稱之爲先天之火), 신화(腎火), 신중지화(腎中之火), 무형지화(無形之火), 진화(眞火), 건화(乾火), 원기(原氣), 음중지화(陰中之火), 수중유양등(水中有陽等); 이명문지수가칭지위선천지수(而命門之水可稱之爲先天之水), 신수(腎水), 신중지수(腎中之水), 무형지수(無形之水), 진수(眞水), 원정(原精), 음중지수(陰中之水), 화중유음등(火中有陰等). 3. 진수가생진화(眞水可生眞火), 진화역가생진수(眞火亦可生眞水), 양자위호생적관계(兩者爲互生的關係). 강조료유형지화(强調了有形之火), 수극화(水克火), 단무형지화(但無形之火), 수생화(水生火). 4. 명문지화시일양함어이음지간적감괘상(命門之火是一陽陷於二陰之間的坎卦象). 5. 인적생명활동고수화이생, 이신중적진화진수지명문시기본원(而腎中的眞火眞水之命門是其本源). 6. 명문시운행십이경맥적주체(命門是運行十二經脈的主體), 시십이경지주(是十二經之主), 차위촉사생성십이관공능적십이관지화원(且爲促使生成十二官功能的十二官之化源), 고위십이관지주(故爲十二官之主). 7. 명문적작용가영향정개십이관(命門的作用可影響整個十二官), 우기시인화생토적관계(尤其是因火生土的關係), 대비적공능적영향갱대(對脾的功能的影響更大). 8. 인적생명지성쇠의고명문지화, 고명문지화고갈즉인적생명장종결(故命門之火枯竭則人的生命將終結). 9. 오곤(吳崑), 장개빈등계승료류하간적주장(張介賓等稽承了劉河間的主張), 기인위자하향상수지제칠절처위시명문(旣認爲自下向上數至第七節處爲是命門), 차처기위소심(此處旣爲小心). 10. 진사탁계승상술학설화조헌가지설(陣士鐸繼承上述學說和趙獻可之說), 주장칠절지방시소심(主張七節之芳是小心), 차인위차처기위명문소재(且認爲此處旣爲命門所在).

• 혜화의학회지
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.71-117
• /
• 1994

• 대한한의학원전학회지
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.141-155
• /
• 2010

Simpo(心包. Pericardium) was described early in "Hwangjenaegyeong(黃帝內經)". But there has been a lot of criticisms about this organ. Jinsatak(陳士鐸) is one of famous doctors in Cheong(淸) dynasty. He suggested a creative Oriental medical theory and he did a profound research on Simpo(心包). "Oegyeongmieon(外經微言)" is one of his books recording his oriental medical theory in detail so it is the good documentary record for observing his theory of the Simpo(心包). So we looked into his theory of Simpo(心包) in "Oegyeongmieon(外經微言)" and also referred to his other books. You might be able to get a viewpoint of utilizing Simpo(心包) in several ways through reading this paper.

• 한국의사학회지
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.112-138
• /
• 2007

This thesis is a study about Mai Jue Chan Wei (脈訣闡微) among many medical books by Chen Shi Duo (陳士鐸) who was a famous medical practitioner of China under the early Qing dynasty. Chen Shi Duo (陳士鐸) who is from, Shaoxing (紹興), Zhejiang (浙江) had his pen-name as Jing Zhi (敬之) and also was called as Zhu Hua Zi (朱華子) or Lian Gong (蓮公) under pseudonym of Yuan Gong (遠公). He was a medical practitioner under the early Qing dynasty in China and the date of birth and death was not for sure nor was written in the history book.

• 대한한의학방제학회지
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.47-64
• /
• 2014

Objectives : Bi-jeung is a traditional oriental medical name. Bi-jeung is similar to rheumatoid arthritis(RA). This study was investigated to get the practical use of Bi-jeung prescriptions in Byunjeungrok. Methods: Original records related Bi-jeung in Byunjeungrok are interpreted and contemplated. Results: Bi-jeung prescriptions in Byunjeungrok are put stress on Byunjeung in conformity with entrails good energy enforcing as well as evil energy eliminating removing damp-evil among wind-evil cold-evil and damp-evil showing concrete prognosis. Conclusions: This study indicates that Bi-jeung prescriptions in Byunjeungrok have an influences for RA. It may also suggest that Bi-jeung prescriptions may expand therapy field for treatment of RA. and its complications.

• 대한한의학방제학회지
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.13-21
• /
• 2010

Low Back Pain Prescriptions of Jin, sa tak are peculiar to using Atractylodis Macrocephalae Rhizoma(AMR). All low back pain prescriptions which are enlisted in Byunjeunggimoon, Byunjeungrok and Byunjeungokham include AMR. Whereas low back pain prescriptions which is enlisted in Seoksilbirok are 7 of 10. Preexistence of low back pain prescriptions are not necessarily used AMR. But Jin, sa tak who lived at Ming and Ching era presented AMR in low back pain treatment. AMR is able to get rid of dampness between the kidney functional area and umbilicus. The results are as follows : It is made much of the malicious dampness which is in the kidney. There are not used cold but warm and eliminating dampness herbs to invigorate kidney. It shows that Jin, sa tak who was a Taoist used invigorating and warming kidney herbs. Atractylodis Macrocephalae Rhizoma is mainly used in treating low back pain from Jin, sa tak. Jin, sa tak shows concrete prognosis to treat a disease.

• 대한한의학원전학회지
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.31-51
• /
• 2009

The characteristics of Jin's ideas on clinic theory can be arranged as follows. 1. Jin emphasized warming and tonifying[溫補] in treatment and the part that shows this the best is the taking care of[調理] the Vital gate[命門], kidney, liver, and spleen. His ideas were based on his understanding of a human life's origin, and was influenced by Seolgi(薛己), Joheon-ga(趙獻可) and Janggaebin(張介賓)'s Vital gate and source Gi theory(元氣說) so scholastically, he has that in common with them but was later criticized by later doctors such as Oksamjon(玉三尊) as an 'literary doctor(文字醫)' who followed the ideas of "Uigwan(醫貫)". 2. The warming and tonifying school[溫補學派], who were influenced by Taoism, said in their theory of disease outbreak[發病學說] that since one must not hurt one's Yin essence and Yang fire [陰精陽火] there is more deficiency than excess, so that was why they used tonifying methods. Jin was also like them and this point of view is universal in internal medicine, gynecology, pediatric medicine and surgery and so on. 3. Jin, who saw the negative form of pulse diagnosis[診脈] emphasized following symptoms over pulse diagnosis using the spirit of ‘finding truth based on truth[實事求是]' in "Maekgyeolcheonmi(脈訣闡微)", but emphasized 'the combination of pulse and symptoms[脈證合參]'. He understood pulse diagnosis as a defining tool for symptoms, and in "Seoksilbirok(石室秘錄)" simplified pulse diagnosis into 10 methods : floating/sunken(浮沉), slow/fast(遲數), large/fine(大小), vacuous/replete(虛實) and slippery/rough(滑澀). 4. Jin used 'large formulas(大方)' a lot that usually featured a large dose, and in " Bonchosinpyeon(本草新編)" he thought of the seven formulas(七方) and ten preparations(十劑) as the standard when using medicine. He did away with old customs and presented a 'new(新)' and 'extra(奇)' point of view. He especially used a lot of Insam(人蔘) when tonifying Gi and Geumeunhwa(金銀花) when treating sores and ulcers. 5. In the area of surgery Jin gave priority to the early finding and treatment of disease with internal treatment[內治] and was against the overuse of acupuncture. However records of surgical measures in a special situation like lung abscesses(肺癰) and liver abscesses(肝癰), and anesthetic measures using 'Manghyeongju(忘形酒)' and 'Singoiyak(神膏異藥)' and opening the abdomen or skull, and organ transplants using a dog's tongue are important data. 6. Jin stated the diseases of Gi and blood broadly. Especially in the principles of treating blood, blood diseases had to be forwarded[順] and Gi regulation[理氣] was the number one priority and stated the following two treatments. First, in "Jeonggiinhyeolpyeon(精氣引血篇)" of volume 6 of "Oegyeongmieon(外經微言)", for the rules for treating blood he stated the pattern identification of finding Gi in blood and blood in Gi. Second, he emphasized Gi regulation(理氣) in blood diseases and stated that the Gi must be tonifyed after finding the source of the loss of blood.

• 동국한의학연구소논문집
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.33-85
• /
• 1998

"변증기문(辯證奇聞)"은 청대(淸代)(1687년(年)) 진사탁(陳士鐸)이 저술(著述)한 의서(醫書)로서 126문(門)의 형식으로 이루어져 있다. 내용을 보면 한의학적 이법방약(理法方藥)의 논리체계를 제시하였다고 볼 수 있다. 명말청초(明末淸初)이후 중국에서는 실증적(實證的)인 학풍(學風)의 등장에 따라 역사이론(歷史理論)에 대한 비판 및 정리작업이 활발히 이루어지기 시작하였으며, 이 시기에 저작된 "변증기문(辯證奇聞)"은 현재 우리나라 임상가(臨床家)에서 널리 회자(膾炙)되고 있는 비방(秘方)과 관련된 의서(醫書)중의 하나로 이에 대한 내용을 정리함으로서 현대와의 연계를 도모해 볼 수 있었다. 주로 부장변증논치(腑臟辨證論治)에 대한 시각에 입각하였고, "상한론(傷寒論)"을 보완하면서 비판한면도 찾아볼 수 있었다. 약물은 체내(體內)의 진액손상여부(津液損傷與否)를 살펴 사용하였다.