• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.16 no.5
• /
• pp.148-156
• /
• 2016

Party is the main factor in modern country. Therefore, there are a lot of articles about the difference of public policies and citizen's recognition according to their supported party. However, there is few research about the regulation recognition according to citizen's supported party. This study focuses on the differences of a regulation recognition according to citizen's supported party. In result, there are a lot of differences of regulation recognition according to citizen's supported party. The people who support Saenuri Party have a positive recognition about a necessity of regulation, a fairness of regulation, a reliability of a regulation. But the people who don't support Saenuri Party have a negative recognition about those. In Korea, government regulations have a lot of relationship with a party and politics.

• Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
• /
• v.3 no.2
• /
• pp.229-238
• /
• 1998

Current cost income is composed of current operating profit and holding gains. There is two viewpoints about the nature of current cost changes: earnings and capital adjustments. The former is based on the financial capital maintenance concept, while the latter is based on the physical capital maintenance concept. Proponents of current cost accounting are convinced that it provides more useful information than conventional accounting. Advocates of financial capital believe that current cost information is needed for management to evaluate their past decisions, and thereby be able to improve their decision-making ability. Defenders of historical cost point out that current cost accounting violates the traditional revenue recognition principle by recognising increases in the value of assets before sales.

• 한국과학기술학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2006.12a
• /
• pp.131-154
• /
• 2006

• KOREAN POULTRY JOURNAL
• /
• v.11 no.1 s.111
• /
• pp.114-118
• /
• 1979

쎄일즈맨 여러분! 상품을 팔려고 애쓰시기 전에 대인관계가 좋도록 인간 수업에 힘써 봅시다. 그러면 인간적 매력이 생기게 되고 인간적 매력을 가지면 주위 사람들은 당신의 목적달성에 협력을 해주는 자기 지지자가 됩니다.

• Analyses & Alternatives
• /
• v.6 no.2
• /
• pp.79-115
• /
• 2022

This study aims to account for electoral choice in the 2020 presidential election by focusing on social identity which forms the basis for core partisan groups. Two views compete to explain the origins of polarization, policy versus party. One emphasizes policy as more influential in choosing presidential candidates. This follows the tradition of retrospective voting theory in which voters' choice rely on government performance. Incumbent president whose performance proves well are rewarded to be reelected. Policy performance is based on measures around distinctive preferences for government spending. Republican Individuals prefer individual responsibility to government support, while Democratic counterparts support government support. Another perspective put an emphasis on the role partisanship which favors in-party members and disfavors partisan out-groups. Interparty animosity plays the key role in determining electoral behavior. This study relies on the Views of the Electorate Research (VOTER) Survey which provides a panel data of several waves from 2011 to 2020. A comparative evaluation of two views highlights three findings. First, policy matters. Policy preferences of voters are the primary drives of political behavior. Electoral outcomes in 2020 turned out to be the results of policy considerations of voters. 53.7 percent of voters tilted toward individual responsibility voted for Trump, whereas 70.4 percent of those favorable views of government support than individual responsibility voted for Biden. Thus effects of policy correspond to a positive difference of 26.4 percent points. Second, partisanship effects are of similar extent in influencing electoral choice of candidates: Democrats are less likely to vote for Trump by 42.4 percent points, while Republicans are less likely to vote for Biden by 48.7 percent points. Third, animosity of Republicans toward Democrat core groups creates 26.5 percent points of favoring Trump over Biden. Democrat animosity toward Republican core groups creates a positive difference of 13.7 percent points of favoring Biden.

• Journal of agricultural medicine and community health
• /
• v.46 no.4
• /
• pp.253-265
• /
• 2021

Objectives: The aim of the study is to identify the success factors of 6 months of smoking cessation targeting male workers in small and medium-sized businesses. Methods: The subjects of this study were smoking male workers who had got the visiting services at a tobacco control center to stop smoking from January 2018 to December 2020. Total number of the participants was 767. Results: The male workers in small and medium enterprises had a success rate of 20.2% for smoking cessation for 6 months. With multiple logistic regression, the factors causing the differences in the success rate for 6 months of the workers were as follows. - The odds ratios (ORs)(95% confidence interval, CI) of the age group of under 29 and 40-49 years were 0.10 (0.03-0.29) and 0.43 (0.24-0.76), respectively, compared to the 50 years and older group. The ORs (95% CI) of the daily average of smoking group of 11-20 and more than 21 were 0.52(0.34-0.80) and 0.46(0.24-0.90), respectively, when compared to the group of 1-10. The ORs (95% CI) of the supporting persons for quitting smoking group of with spouse and other family were 1.99(1.18-3.34), compared to the group with no one. Conclusions: This study showed that the chance of success for smoking cessation for 6 months is higher when the subjects have spouses and other family Supporting persons for quitting smoking. And it also shows that the less they smoke a day and the older they are, the more likely it is to succeed in quitting smoking.

• Korean Journal of Legislative Studies
• /
• v.26 no.2
• /
• pp.35-71
• /
• 2020

The purpose of this study is to verify the effect of electoral competition on voters deciding on strategic split-ticket voting under the mixed-member electoral system. As result, the more competitive the constituencies are, the more voters choose to vote for the major parties. The results of logistic regression analysis including interaction terms showed that the more competitive the constituencies are, the more voters choose for candidates from the major parties. Also, the finding shows that major party supporters are less affected by electoral competition than minor party supporters in choosing a candidate in the single-seat districts. In the case of minor party supporters, the more competitive the constituencies were, the more likely they were to choose the major party candidate instead of the minor party candidate. Based on these results, it can be inferred that voters are affected by the presence or behavior of other voters in local constituencies under the first-past-the-post rule. Because of the psychology of not wanting their votes to be useless, voters cast their ballots more strategically as the competition in constituencies intensifies, and as the competition in constituencies slackens, such tendencies weaken, and this trait is particularly evident among minor party supporters.

• CDE review
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.14-19
• /
• 2007

PLM과 ERP의 정보 및 프로세스 통합은 개개의 기여도 함보다는 훨씬 큰 종합적인 이익을 가져오기 위하여 조직 전반에 걸쳐서 사용자들의 생산성을 제고한다. 그러나 이러한 이익을 얻기 위하여 정보는 조직을 통하여 자유로운 흐름이 있어야 한다. 이러한 통합의 범위를 결정하는 것은 복잡한 작업이 될 수 있다. 반드시 고려되어야 할 인자로는 다음과 같다. - 데이터 및 포로세스 소유권 - 정보의 마스터 출처 정의 - 필요한 통합 수준 - 제품 설계 및 생산의 두 영역에 걸쳐있는 프로세스를 어떻게 관리할 것인가? - 공통된 용어를 사용 각 회사에서 PLM과 ERP를 통합하는 최상의 방법을 결정할 때, 필요로 하는 것에 우선권을 두어야 한다. 즉, 희망하는 것 보다는 비즈니스상 요구되는 사항에 대한 것이다. 개발, 초기적용, 진행중인 유지보수를 포함하여 소유총비용(total cost of ownership)을 계산한다. PLM-ERP 통합은 데이터 통합 그 이상의 작업임을 명심하여야 한다. 이익을 최대화하기 위하여 제품과 관련된 정보, 프로세스. 조직 및 구성원의 광범위한 범위를 포함하여야 한다. 기업의 진취적인 노력에도 불구하구, 경영진의 지원은 성공에 결정적이다. 고심하고 있는 경영진이나 문제들을 인정하고 있는 사람들은 제품개발 프로세스 내에서 PLM과 ERP 통합의 필요성, 솔루션 및 이익에 대하여 필요한 교육을 제공받는 것을 필요로 하고 있다. 더욱이 그들은 성공을 보장하는 통합, 지침제공, 후원 및 자원의 사전 행동하는 지지자가 되기를 희망한다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2012.11a
• /
• pp.604-607
• /
• 2012

소셜 네트워크 서비스의 하나인 트위터는 팔로우를 통하여 사용자 간의 관계를 맺을 수 있다. 트위터 사용자들은 다양한 팔로워들이 존재한다. 이 팔로워들은 사용자에 대한 호감을 가지고 팔로우 하거나, 맹목적으로 추종하거나, 부정적인 의견을 지니고 사용자의 행동과 글을 관찰하기 위해 팔로우할 수도 있다. 본 논문에서 사용자에게 팔로워들이 어떠한 목적으로 그 사용자를 팔로워의 행태를 분석하는 모델을 제안한다. 대상사용자의 영향력 있는 팔로워를 추출하고, 팔로워의 리트윗 정보, 프로파일, 최신 트윗의 감정분석을 통해 지지자, 중립, 비지지자로 분류한다. 제안 방법의 유효성을 검증하기 위해 트윗 데이터에서 정치인과 언론인 5 명의 팔로워들 중 무작위로 3 만명을 추출하여 실험하였다. 실험 결과 영향력 있는 사용자 추출을 통한 지지 팔로워 추출이 효과적임을 알 수 있다.

• Management & Information Systems Review
• /
• v.37 no.2
• /
• pp.259-281
• /
• 2018

Advocates of mandatory IFRS adoption claim that IFRS increase financial statement comparability, which in turn leads to greater cross-border investment(Securities and Exchange Commision, 2008). The notion is that improved financial statement comparability reduces the information acquisition costs of global investors and thereby increase their investment in foreign firms. The purpose of this study is to examine this assertion by examining whether the K-IFRS adoption rusults in improved comparability that leads to increased investment by foreign investment. We also examined whether the relation between comparability and foreign investment has strengthen after adoption of K-IFRS. To achieve the purpose of our study, we measure Korean firms comparability using stock price model, stock return model and cash flow from operation model by Barth et al.(2012). We use both foreign ownership in the end of year and average during the year for dependent variables were to reduce bias. We test our hypothesis using 1,817 firm-year observation of KOSPI firms during the period of our analysis, 2011-2015. Consistent with our hypothesis, we find K-IFRS adoption results in a greater increase in foreign investment in firms with high comparability firms. This result indicate that the adoption of K-IFRS intends to achieve the international accounting convergence as stated in the roadmap and to reduce the Korea Discount.