• KLA journal
• /
• v.11 no.4
• /
• pp.8-12
• /
• 1970

• KLA journal
• /
• v.7 no.9
• /
• pp.2-6
• /
• 1966

• KLA journal
• /
• v.7 no.10
• /
• pp.15-21
• /
• 1966

• KLA journal
• /
• v.40 no.5 s.318
• /
• pp.36-39
• /
• 1999

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.39 no.2
• /
• pp.147-167
• /
• 2008

The purpose of the research is to 4ind out its problems and to suggest its solution by investigating and analyzing the present condition of the Virtual Reference Shelves establishment in Chinese university libraries. To achieve the goal, this study establishes theoretical foundations for virtual reference shelves. The evaluation standard was set up on the basis of this theoretical foundation. The 38 university libraries, which had been selected in 985 Project were analyzed by this evaluation standard. The results are used to justify the cooperative establishment for virtual reference shelves.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.49 no.3
• /
• pp.253-272
• /
• 2015

This study analyzed library awareness and anxiety among people in their 20s living in East Asia. The objective is to develop the international library cooperation agenda for life-long education proliferation. User groups in Korea, China, and Japan were investigated to understand the differences in library awareness based on the situational contexts such as preferred resources, use frequency, educational level, and gender. Results of the data analysis showed the correlation between library anxiety and use patterns such as preferred information sources and frequency of use. Specifically, the user group in China has the highest level of library anxiety with every factor. Also, the Korean user group was measured to have the lowest level of library anxiety in terms of digital information factor. Based on these results, the study presents several recommendations for resolving library anxiety such as embracing new information need with regard to environmental change and suggesting a new space policy for libraries.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.57 no.1
• /
• pp.23-44
• /
• 2023

The word library(図書館) is a Japanese translation of the Western library or Bibliothek in the mid-Meiji period. This word has been accepted in Chinese(图书馆), Taiwan(圖書館), Korea(도서관), and Vietnam(Dđồ thư quán), which are Chinese-speaking countries. If so, when and who first introduced the term library to Japan and China? In Japan, the enlightenment thinker Fukuzawa's 『Seiyo Jijo, 1866』 is regarded as the first document to introduce the Western library, and in China, the article published in 『Qing Yi Bao, 1896』 by the reformed thinker Liang Qichao referred to as the first example. Therefore, this study traced and demonstrated the time and person in which the word library appeared, focusing on modern dictionaries, books, translations, papers, and newspaper articles that were introduced in both countries. As a result, the theory of the introduction to Fukuzawa in 1866 is wrong because Western libraries are described in various terms in many diaries and dictionaries, including Motoki's 『An English Japanese Dictionary of the Spoken Language, 1814』. Also, in China, the theory of introduction of Liang Qichao in 1896 is not true because the term library first appeared in Ryu Jeong-dam's 『A Dictionary of Loan Words and Hybrid Words in Chinese, 1884』. In the same context, it is necessary to trace and argue the history of the first use of the term library in Korea and the name of the first library in Korea established by the Busan Branch of the Japan Hongdo Association in 1901.

• KLA journal
• /
• v.30 no.1 s.254
• /
• pp.16-31
• /
• 1989

• KLA journal
• /
• v.33 no.3 s.274
• /
• pp.29-36
• /
• 1992

이 글은 중화인민공화국의 도서관정보학회의 중진이며 현재 대련시 요령사범대학 도서정보학과 주임교수인 단행교수가 집필한 글을 다께우치교수(죽내철 : 도서관정보대학 부학장)가 번역하여 일본 도서관계(1992년 3월호 Vol.43, No.6) 게재한 것을 김용원선생 (학술정보센타)의 협조로 저자, 번역자, 저작권 소유자인 일본도서관학연구회의 승인을 받아 번역한 것임.<역자주>

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 1997.08a
• /
• pp.95-98
• /
• 1997

의학사 연구영역의 확대로 다양한 주제를 다룬 연구문헌들이 배출되고 있음에도 불구하고 분류표에서 의학사는 매우 간단하게 취급되고 있어 이들 문헌을 분류하는데 어려움이 있다. 본 연구에서는 KDC, DDC, 중국도서관 도서분류법 등 일반 도서관용 분류표와 NLMC, 보스톤의학도서관분류,. 커닝햄분류표, 버나드분류표 등 의학도서관용 분류표에서 의학사가 어떻게 취급되고 있는 지 살펴보았으며, 의학사문헌의 보다 정확한 분류 및 분류표 재전개를 위하여 의학사의 연구범주를 고찰하였다.