• Journal of the Korean Institute of Educational Facilities
• /
• v.26 no.5
• /
• pp.37-39
• /
• 2019

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Educational Facilities
• /
• v.26 no.5
• /
• pp.32-36
• /
• 2019

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Educational Facilities
• /
• v.27 no.1
• /
• pp.19-25
• /
• 2020

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Disaster Information Conference
• /
• 2023.11a
• /
• pp.63-64
• /
• 2023

중대시민재해의 대상은 공중이용시설, 공중교통수단, 그리고 원료·제조물로 구성되고, 재해를 관리하기 위한 안전보건체계와 이에 대한 이행체계로 구성된다. 중대시민재해의 주요 대상 기관은 지자체와 공공기관, 그리고 다중밀집시설 사업장을 가진 업체가 주요 대상이 된다. 특히 지자체의 경우에 광범위한 시설물을 관리하기 때문에 그 관리체계의 복잡함이 발생하며 이에 따라, 이를 효과적으로 관리할 수 있는 시스템 관점의 체계를 본 연구에서 초점을 두었다.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology
• /
• v.29 no.4
• /
• pp.907-918
• /
• 2019

The purpose of this study is to understand the cybersecurity policies and critical infrastructure protection of the United States through analyzing Donald Trump's administration executive orders, the national cyber strategy, and the legislation. The analysis has three findings. First, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) became a main agent in the cybersecurity while the role of the White House was reduced. Second, Trump's administration expanded its role and mission in the policy area by extending the meaning of critical infrastructure. Third, in the case of cyber threats, the government can be involved in the operation of critical infrastructures in the private sector. The opinions of the professional bureaucrats and DHS were more reflected in the direction of the cybersecurity policy than those of the White House. In contrast to Barack Obama's administration, the Trump administration's cybersecurity strategies were not much studied. This study provides insights for improving cybersecurity policies and critical infrastructure protection.

• The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
• /
• no.47
• /
• pp.197-225
• /
• 2016

Korean archival community had continuously dealt with attempts at weakening the core of records and archives principles in the name of deregulation. In 2015, Korean government announced revisions of the Archives Law in order to boost uses of commercial records facilities by public institutions. As key concepts were unclear and understandings among stake-holders varied, a considerable degree of chaos and anxiety aroused. The amendment itself was held at National Assembly. The unresolved disputes rested, however, waiting for another attempt of similar nature. As the recognition propelled this paper, it aimed at reviewing major contending arguments and proposing future actions.

• The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
• /
• no.47
• /
• pp.227-254
• /
• 2016

The purpose of this study is to review whether Certified Electronic Document Center can perform electronic records preservation work as 'external electronic records storage facilities'. It began with addressing the current state of Certified Electronic Document Center. And then reviewed the key concepts of archival science in archival science literature and the meaning of electronic records preservation. The results of the review pointed out that these concepts are confused depending on each designated community's interests while the revision of the Archives Law. And finally we inspected whether Certified Electronic Document Center has an ability to perform the electronic records preservation work. For this, we compared and analyzed Archives Law, national archives' standards and regulations related to Certified Electronic Document Center. As a result, we may confirm that the current Certified Electronic Document Center did not have the capability for records management.

• 레미콘
• /
• no.6 s.24
• /
• pp.115-123
• /
• 1990

• 레미콘
• /
• no.3 s.23
• /
• pp.131-139
• /
• 1990

• 어항어장
• /
• s.15
• /
• pp.52-57
• /
• 1991