• The Korean Publising Journal, Monthly
• /
• s.114
• /
• pp.16-16
• /
• 1992

기독교계에서 안팎의 '도전'에 대한 '응전'의 방식으로 저작물을 펴내고 있다. 시한부 종말론이라는 내부의 적과 뉴 에이지 운동이라는 외부의 적을 비판하는 책들을 올해 여름 이후 20여권씩 펴낸 것. 세상의 파국을 전제하는 종말론과는 대척적으로 뉴 에이지 운동은 일종의 유토피아 운동이라고 한다.

• The Korea Swine Journal
• /
• v.14 no.9 s.157
• /
• pp.42-43
• /
• 1992

• The Korean Publising Journal, Monthly
• /
• s.79
• /
• pp.18-19
• /
• 1991

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.145
• /
• pp.217-244
• /
• 2018

This paper reviews how $J{\ddot{u}}rgen$ Moltmann embraces and transforms the philosophy of Ernst Bloch. For what are the hopes of the two thinkers who presuppose opposing worldviews? This question will provide a good opportunity to look at how different religious types, based on different worldviews in modern philosophy of religion, can understand and communicate with one another. Ernst Bloch was a philosopher who originally interpreted Judeo-Christian thought through Marxism and Persian Dualism and helped to carry out the intrinsic criticism of the doctrine of Christian eschatology by developing atheism of Christianity into a philosophy of hope. Bloch and Moltmann deal with the concepts of future, humanity, nation, and hope in the eschatological horizon, but their worldviews are so different. For example, the connection between the Beginning and Ending, Disjunction or Continuation, the Core of Existence and Resurrection, Messianism and Marxism, Atheism and Theism, Persian Dualism and Judeo-Christian Monotheism. Therefore, a one-sided interpretation that ignores worldview differences in the hopes of these two thinkers should be avoided. Moltmann actively embraced the Messianism of the Jewish thinker, Bloch, by excluding Marxism, made the spectrum of broad-minded horizons diminished in the union of Messianism and Marxism. Moltmann replaced the utopian possibilities of matter in the Ontology of Not-Yet-Being, with the resurrection of Christ, who was crucified, and with the God of Creation and the God of Exodus. By overthrowing the position of atheism in Christianity, which was very important for Bloch, with the system of Trinitarian Monotheism, it resulted in the disconnection and conflict between the Old Testament and the New Testament, especially the ignorance of the tension between God the Lord and Jesus Christ.

• Korea Petroleum Association Journal
• /
• no.2 s.12
• /
• pp.52-53
• /
• 1982

대체에너지론자들이 아무리 석유문명의 종말론을 외쳐대어도 현대문명에서 차지하는 석유의 비중은 쉽사리 사라지지 않을 것이다. 해마다 석유가 새로운 발견되고 있다는 점을 고려하면 미확인 매장량을 포함하여 앞으로 100~150년간은 석유가 존재하리라는 것이 일반적 견해이다.

• Proceedings of the Costume Culture Conference
• /
• 2004.04a
• /
• pp.130-132
• /
• 2004

현대의 시대가 산업화되고 문명화되어가고 있지만 사람들은 여전히 확실성 없는 미래에 대한 불안을 가지고 살아가며 현세의 안위를 걱정한다 이러한 현상은 종교에 대한 관심의 증가와 건강에 대한 지나친 걱정, 지구의 종말론을 논하는 등의 여러 분야에서 나타난다. 한국도 예외가 아니며 매스컴에서 끊임없이 보도되고 있는 현대 사회의 미신과 민간 신앙에서도 알 수 있다. 미신과 민간신앙은 민족의 고유한 전통이며 또 하나의 종교이다. (중략)

• Digital Contents
• /
• no.3 s.70
• /
• pp.32-37
• /
• 1999

금년이 지나면 지구에 대재앙이 닥칠 것이라는 종말론을 얘기하고 있다. 2000년이 되면 1900년대로 돌아간다는 밀레니엄 버그문제로 따른 것이다. 그렇지만 인류는 해결방안을 가지고 있다. 지금 이 시각에도 버그를 해결하기 위해 동분서주하고 있는 사람들과 기업의 무수히 많기 때문이다. 밀레니엄 버그현황을 살펴봤다.

• Cross-Cultural Studies
• /
• v.52
• /
• pp.79-110
• /
• 2018

This purpose of this study was to address the issue of forgiving unforgivable crimes, inevitably raised in Paul Ricoeur's thoughts. He explores the possibility of righteous historical representation of tragic events in Western history. Being aware of injustices of amnesty indiscriminately extended by the government, he studied the process through in which a genuine pardon should unfold before granting amnesty. He believes that this process called the "odyssey of forgiveness" presupposes the process of "imputability," in which the perpetrator should acknowledge his/her wrongdoing as his/her act and take reasonable responsibilities for it in a modest position. However, such acknowledgement of wrongdoing cannot be any reason for the victim to necessarily grant forgiveness to the perpetrator. According to him, forgiveness is a gift and the power of love enabled by a complete forgiver only. The initiative of forgiveness is attributable to the forgiver only. To never relinquish tension between love and justice in the forgiving process, he devises a way of planning an equation of forgiveness in a vertical scheme. Finally, he explains the process of requesting and granting forgiveness in a form of a righteous historical representation against the oblivion of past tragic events. He contends that this event of forgiveness promises a new life and a new era to all seeking and granting forgiveness, and that write a righteous history in eschatological hope.

• Journal of Christian Education in Korea
• /
• v.70
• /
• pp.107-140
• /
• 2022

This study is a review of the role of Christian education in the face of ecological crisis and the task of its recovery from the perspective of Moltmann's creation theory. Mankind has achieved epoch-making industrial development through several industrial revolutions. However, as a result, the ecosystem has suffered severe physical aches and has reached the point of revealing anomalies. In the face of such destruction and suffering of the ecosystem, Christian education needs to approach the ecological sensitivity toward the natural world more holistically and present a practical alternative. Moltmann reminds us that today's growing exploitation of nature by humans stems from a human-centered ecological consciousness that the world belongs to humans. At the same time, it suggests a transition to a God-centered ecological world consciousness. 'A community of creation', 'the fellowship of the Triune God', and 'eschatological new creation through the Sabbath' are key concepts that integrate God-centered ecological world consciousness. Based on Moltmann's creation theory, this article examines the ecological sensibility that Christian education should pursue from the point of view of the sacramental creative community, and reviews the role and practical alternatives of Christian education. Through this, it was derived that the world, including humans, is not owned by humans, but is a sacramental community that is built together toward the end as a part of nature and reveals the glory of God. In addition, it was suggested that Christian education need to be recognized as a suffering subject which mediates humanity and the nature of the mutual fellowship of reconciliation. in the fellowship of God. Sabbath keeping education, which celebrates God's creation and aims for the completion of the eschatological creation, will become a practical area for Christian education to practice for the restoration of the collapsed ecosystem. Moltmann's creation theory is significant in that it provides a meaningful Christian educational insight to restore the ecological environment as well as interest in the ecological environment that has been overlooked or ignored by Christian education.

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.142
• /
• pp.165-192
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this thesis is to explain the difference between Heidegger's hermeneutical philosophy and Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics. The difference is to say that Heidegger's philosophy begins with Aristotle's theory of category and transcendental philosophy. On the other hand, the beginning of Gadamer's philosophical research is Plato's dialog, philosophy and Hegels dialectic. 2. Heidegger regards humanism as a variant of the modern ideal of human beings. On the contrary, Gadamer understands humanism as a place where romantism leads to the ideals of human education. 3. Heidegger says that the hermeneutical circle is still a logical and existential structure of the circle. On the contrary, Gadamer understands the circle as a circle between the whole and the part. This circle is the law of traditional hermeneutics derived from the tradition of rhetoric. 4. Heidegger says Plato's philosophy is the first beginning of the substance metaphysic, Hegel's philosophy the end of the subject metaphysic. On the contrary, Gadamer says the hermeneutical understanding and the hermeneutical interpretation is endless. 5. Heidegger's ontology is as Sein zum Tode a future oriented and eschatological. On the contrary, Gadamer's hermeneutic is as Sein zum Text always the way to a past, the infinite openness.