• Asia Marketing Journal
• /
• v.13 no.2
• /
• pp.49-69
• /
• 2011

Issues of how firms form collaborative inter-firm alliances, how they nurture the alliance relationships as meaningful ones, and how they evolve and manage collaborations in turbulent market environments deserve increasing research attention. To contribute to filling this void, this study conceptualizes an alliance orientation as a firm's capabilities to help achieve an advantageous alliance performance to its rivals and based on this concept, demonstrates specific process for a successful alliance performance. First, this study empirically explores the influence of a new construct, alliance orientation, on firms' alliance performance. Second, the concept of alliance creativity as a positional mediation variable between alliance orientation and market performance is explained and then empirically explored. Third, alliance performance as a mediator between alliance orientation and market performance is presented and then is empirically reviewed.

• Asia Marketing Journal
• /
• v.13 no.4
• /
• pp.139-158
• /
• 2012

This study was intended to classify tie-in promotion tools by the criteria of benefit-fit between consumer and tie-in promotions. Tie-in promotion tools include tie-in price reductions, tie-in coupons, tie-in memberships, tie-in contests, tie-in sweepstakes, tangible and intangible tie-in premiums, tie-in payment terms, tie-in samples, tie-in events(culture event, charity event, experience event) and tie-in fund·rebates. The fit between consumer pursuit benefit and tie-in promotion supplying benefit was used as a classification criteria on the basis of Lee et al.'s study in 2011. For the experiment, one stimuli and 12 scenarioes were developed. 100 pieces of data were obtained for each scenario. As a result, benefit fit was subsequently divided into two factors: hedonic-benefit fit and utilitarian-benefit fit. Tie-in promotion tools were then classified into 4 types: high hedonic benefit-added, high utilitarian benefit-added, low hedonic benefit-added, and low utilitarian benefit-added. In previous research, tie-in promotion type was mainly divided by the evaluative criteria on company's viewpoint such as horizontal/vertical or intra-company/ inter-company, which reflects mutual exclusiveness between two criteria. Whereas, in this study, tie-in promotion type was divided by evaluative criteria on consumer's viewpoint such as hedonic- benefit fit/utilitarian-benefit fit. The classifications in this study practically reflect benefit-added of tie-in promotion type superadded one benefit coexisting two benefits.

• 한국벤처창업학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2021.11a
• /
• pp.179-183
• /
• 2021

창업기업의 성과는 창업가 개인의 역량 뿐 만 아니라 네트워크 등 기업가 정신이 발현되는 모든 영역의 요소들이 작용한다. 재무적 자원에서부터 기업의 기능별 역량과 자원에 이르기까지 충분하지 않은 창업기업들은 전략적으로 기업이나 대학과 같은 외부 주체들과의 제휴를 추진하여 성과향상을 의도할 수 있다. 전략적 제휴와 기업 성과 간의 관계는 전략경영분야에서 오랫동안 다루어져 온 연구 주제였다. 다만, 창업기업이라는 한정된 역량과 자원 상황에서 창업 기업이 실제로 이러한 전략적 제휴를 통해 재무성과를 향상시키는지에 대한 연구는 미흡하였다. 이에 본 연구는 창업기업의 전략적 제휴가 재무성과에 미치는 영향을 규명하고 그러한 관계에 영향을 미칠 수 있는 혁신역량 강화활동으로서 R&D투자와 교육훈련 투자의 영향을 분석하고자 한다. 또한, 창업기업이 보유한 인적 여유자원(slack resource)의 역할도 함께 규명하여 창업기업의 전략적 제휴와 관련한 행동적 특성을 논의하고자 한다. 이를 통해 본 연구는 기업이 전략적 제휴를 통해 보다 나은 성과향상을 위한 투자로서 다양한 혁신역량 강화활동 필요성에 대한 시사점을 제시할 것으로 기대한다.

• International Commerce and Information Review
• /
• v.17 no.3
• /
• pp.251-278
• /
• 2015

Previous researches have been conducted on the drivers of alliance performance up to date. Unlike existing literatures, we examine the influence of alliance management capability as direct drivers on venture's alliance performance. Based upon organizational capability theory, we proposed that coordination capability, relationship capability, learning capability are main components of alliance management capabilities. In addition, we proposed capability of CEO as forth alliance management capability in global ventures. Using 78 global ventures as research sample, this study shows that these four alliance capabilities have considerable influence on financial performance of ventures with global alliances.

• Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology
• /
• v.8 no.6
• /
• pp.121-130
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of partnership type (pre-competitive, competitive, pro - competitive, non - competitive partnership) and national cultural characteristics on partnership performance. In order to analyze this, we conducted questionnaires on companies that have conducted international management and affiliated companies. A total of 223 questionnaires were sent. A total of 121 inquiries were collected from 224 survey requests. Based on this, a structured questionnaire was sent back to the staff members listed in the survey request, and a total of 98 samples were collected. The results of the empirical analysis through the questionnaire showed that the difference between the affiliation type and the national culture had a significant effect on the partnership performance. The results showed that the difference between the affiliation type and the national culture had a significant effect on the partnership performance. This could be a very meaningful implication for companies that are able to achieve successful alliances in a way that enables them to achieve successful alliances.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.17 no.3
• /
• pp.540-562
• /
• 2014

Although the impact of technological partner selection on the success of technological alliance is critical, little attention has been paid to the area of technological alliance partner selection criteria and the relationship between partner selection criteria and success factors of alliance. This study bridges this gap by understanding previous studies of general alliance partner selection criteria such as marketing, international, logistics and production alliances. I drew technological alliance partner selection criteria using AHP method with 12 experts who are currently in charge of technological alliance activities at Korean Venture Companies. This study found 4 criteria such as 'task-related', 'partner-related', 'learning-related', 'risk-related' criteria with 14 items and the relative importance of technological alliance partner selection showed as follows: 'risk-related', 'learning-related', 'partner-related', 'task-related' criteria. In order to test the relationship between technological partner selection criteria and performance, I used 215 survey data of Korean Venture Companies. The results showed that 'partner-related' and 'task-related' criteria had strong positive impacts on the success of technological alliance. Further, I put 4 moderating variables into the study model in order to see their moderating effects. However, no moderating variable showed significant effects. In conclusion section, I discussed the findings and implications of this study and directions for future studies.

• The Journal of Information Technology
• /
• v.5 no.1
• /
• pp.113-131
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this study is to investigate the influences of transaction information and reputation about alliance partner on opportunism and alliance performance. In this study, a structural model and several hypotheses were developed regarding the relationships between transaction term, transaction records, reputation of alliance partner, opportunism, and alliance performance. Based on the collected data, the structural model was analyzed with Lisrel 8.12. The results can be summarized as follows. First, the longer the transaction term, the lower the opportunism and the higher the perceived alliance performances. Second, the better the transaction records, the lower the opportunism and the higher the perceived alliance performances. Third, the reputation of alliance partner company has not any influence on the opportunism and the perceived alliance performances. Finally, the lower the opportunism of alliance partner, the higher the perceived alliance performances. At the end of the paper, managerial implications and future research directions are discussed.

• The Korean Journal of Financial Management
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.67-106
• /
• 2002

본 연구는 전략적 제휴가 단기적으로 기업가치에 어떠한 영향을 미치는 가에 관한 실증적 연구이다. 본 연구의 단기적인 성과 결과는 선행연구와 유사하게 나타났다. 즉, 윈도우 (-20, +20) 사이의 표본에 대한 실증적 연구결과, 시장모형과 시장조정모형 모두 전략적 제휴라는 이벤트 발생 시에 비정상수익률과 누적비정상수익률이 발생한다는 사실을 발견하였다. 이러한 사실은 한국의 제휴기업들도, 제휴로 인하여 기업의 효율성이 증대되어 기업가치가 상승한다는 시너지 가설이 적용된다는 사실을 발견하였다. 단기성과에 영향을 미치는 특성요인과의 관계를 조사하기 위해서 회귀분석을 해 본 결과, 총자본수익률(ROI)과 LQHC(토빈의 Q비율이 낮고 사내잉여금수준이 높은 기업은 1의 값, 그 외는 0을 가지는 가변수)가 통계적으로 유의한 변수로 나타났다. 두 변수 모두 단기성과와 부(-)의 관계를 보였다. 총자본수익률이 부(-)의 관계를 보인 것은 Das, Sen, 그리고 Sengupta(1998)의 연구결과와 유사하게 나타났다. 즉, 수익성과 단기적인 기업가치와의 관계가 부(-)의 관계를 보이는 것은 수익성이 낮은 기업일수록 제휴에 대한 일반 투자자의 기대가 크다고 해석할 수 있다. LQHC변수가 단기성과와 부(-)의 상관관계를 보이는 것은 투자기회가 낮고 사내잉여금수준이 높은 기업은 단기성과와 부(-)의 관계를 의미한다. 결론적으로 기업이 전략적 제휴를 맺음으로 해서 기업가치에는 단기적으로 정(+)의 영향을 미친다고 할 수 있다. 이러한 결과는 새로운 경영흐름의 하나인 제휴를 통하여 기업의 경영효율을 높일 수 있음을 시사하고 있다.

• International Commerce and Information Review
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.249-269
• /
• 2012

The focus of our work is to identify and understand the drivers of alliance performance so that businesses can maximize their chances of a successful alliance-an area that has received little attention in empirical modeling. Although both conceptual and applied research on alliances has increased, an empirically tested comprehensive theoretical model that explains alliance performance has yet to be developed. Using five salient perspective, namely market power theory, transaction cost theory, the resource-based view, institutional theory, real option theory, this paper attempts to provide a theoretical rationale linking motives of global alliance networks on firm's capabilities, partner's capabilities, operating structures, and performances of Korean companies. The key contribution of this study is that it paints a picture of what matters in driving alliance performance. Our work shows the complex nature of driving performance and the interplay of firm's capabilities, partner's capabilities, and operating structures for understanding alliance performances. This study has given us a small but significant step forward towards understanding the intricacies of alliance performance. We are now better able to understand the respective roles played by various alliance factors and derive insights that lead to improved alliance performance.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.14 no.12
• /
• pp.6204-6210
• /
• 2013

This study examined adomestic firm's perspective on how their choice of partner selection criteria affects the mediating variables and the performance of international strategic alliances with particular reference to previous experience as a moderating variable. The findings of this study showed that the task-related and partner-related criteria are both positively related to trust and commitment but the results concerning the partner-related criteria repudiates the existing practices that domestic firms select foreign partners based on the partners' attributes because this weaken the commitment of the partnership. This study suggests that firms should revise their partner selection criteria, which will eventually lead to the more desirable performance of international strategic alliances.