• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.13 no.6
• /
• pp.13-28
• /
• 2015

In accordance with importance of the economic value of forests and forest use, the paradigm of development and use has emerged as the dominant paradigm of forest policy. As forests are recognized as an important means of Wellness, the government pursues a policy convergence between forest use and conservation. So, this article analyzed whether the change of forestry convergence paradigm is reflected in policy or not. The purpose of this study was to analyze through content analysis and network analysis, whether the new combined text value are fused in how forest policy. According to the results, the function of utilization which is off the traditional forestry industry and recreation, wellness are acquired a greater importance in the 5th plan than 4th plan. But the 5th plan is insufficient to establish of foundation for forestry management and welfare functions. The evidence suggest a sign of sustained paradigm convergency in forest policy of Korea. As the policy implication in establishing national forest master plan, it is necessary to strengthen policy capability to pursue sustainable forestry utilization, which can converge forest use and conservation.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.22 no.10
• /
• pp.83-92
• /
• 2022

The purpose of this research is to analyze the European paradigm of health investment and its implication. Conventional content analysis of WHO/EU(/EC)/European countries' policy data, and articles shows that the European paradigm of health investment is consist of the basic and extended models, twelve life-course-based health investment policies, and SROI evaluation method. The analyses and discussion points provide policy implications for making virtuous cycle of Korean sustainable healthcare system with economic development in the post Covid-19 era.

• The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
• /
• v.6
• /
• pp.377-400
• /
• 1994

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.10 no.4 s.124
• /
• pp.40-49
• /
• 2000

• Korea Petroleum Association Journal
• /
• no.8 s.174
• /
• pp.42-49
• /
• 1995

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.7 no.7 s.100
• /
• pp.45-56
• /
• 1997

• Transportation Technology and Policy
• /
• v.12 no.1
• /
• pp.21-28
• /
• 2015

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.13 no.1 s.139
• /
• pp.62-73
• /
• 2003

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.7 no.4 s.97
• /
• pp.27-33
• /
• 1997

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.16 no.1
• /
• pp.199-229
• /
• 2013

S&T policy long treated as a sector policy is now solidifying its position as an infrastructure innovation policy that forms the foundation for many different policies. There is a growing need for enhancing the linkage and integration between policies by strengthening planning and coordination functions of the government organizations in charge of innovation policy. The major countries including Japan, U.S., Finland elevated planning and coordination roles and emphasized the interaction between S&T-society and innovation governance in response to emergence of the third-generation innovation policy. This study deal with several issues related STI governance from the post-catchup innovation and holistic innovation policy and examine arguments on governance design. And then new schemes and alternatives of 1)governance design for sustainability, 2)design of policy coordination and integration mechanism, 3)reorganization of S&T administration system will be discussed.