• Journal of the Korean Society of Costume
• /
• v.63 no.5
• /
• pp.132-150
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this study is to examine misnomers about King Heungdeok's "Prohibition of Clothing" by comparing the writings of Jeongdukbon [正德本] and Juzabon [鑄字本], which were different versions of the original texts of "Samguksagi [三國史記]", with 11 related books written between 1948 and 2012. In addition, this study is reconsidered the terms about several clothes as well as the values of fabrics. The study has come up with the following conclusions. 1. We suggested the correction about a misnomer in the 11 books and the misnomers for fabric items appeared most frequently. The records of Jeongdukbon about some of the items were different from ones of Juzabon, especially regarding noble woman's sash were written according to the record of Juzabon in most of the related books. However, when the commonplace woman's sash was taken into consideration, we could suppose that the record of Jeongdukbon was more reliable. 2. We examined the terms for Yodae [腰帶] and Yoban. It can be inferred from the original texts that the Yodae were different in material and function compared to the Dae [帶]. In other words, the wearing position of male's metal Yodae was the waist, whereas the females wore their Dae made of fabrics on their chest. An example of this can be seen from the female clay images of Tomb Yonggang-dong [龍江洞]. Moreover, female's Yo and Ban were distinct items on the basis of documents. For this reason, we suggested that Yodae and Yoban should be separated and written in books. 3. We suggested that Ju [紬, silk tabby] might be valuable according to an result of analysis about the value of recorded fabrics. Besides, Po [布, hempcloth] presumably were used as higher quality fabric than Myeonju [綿紬, silk tabby] on some items because Po was graded on the density by each class.

• Journal of Korean Medical classics
• /
• v.20 no.2
• /
• pp.231-268
• /
• 2007

재일본규주황한의학적전통의학지전신취시중국전통의학적지식(在日本叫做皇漢醫學的傳統醫學之前身就是中國傳統醫學的知識). 16세기이래(16世記以來), 일본불단수도이개조중국의학적최신성과(日本不斷收到而改造中國醫學的最新成果), 동양원류우부동홍류적한방의학체계점점형성적과정전후(同樣源流又不同洪流的漢方醫學體系점점形成的過程前后), 출현료4개학문유파(出現了4個學問流派). 저취시(저就是)"후세파(后世派)"."고방파(古方派)"."절충파(折衷派)"."고증파(考證派)". 소우호세파(소于호世派), 논자이경재대한한의학원전학회지적제19권3호상보고료(논者已경在大한한의학原典학회紙的第19卷3호上보告了), 본논문시연속적연구성과(本논文是연속的硏究成果). 종이재본논문상(종而在本논文上), 이한국적이정환(以한국的李政桓), 백유상(白裕相), 정창현등적연구여중국양영적연구위기초(丁彰炫等的硏究與中國梁嶸的硏九爲基礎), 요개략지보고일본의학방면상적‘고방파’(要槪略地報告日本의학方面上的'古方派'). "고방파"지칭부정근세송명의학이지지지한대장중경적"상한잡병론"지일본의가("古方派"指稱否定近世宋明醫學而只支持漢代張仲景的"傷寒雜病論"之日本醫家). 일반"상한론"전파우일본적실정시대(一般"傷寒論"傳播于日本的室町時代), 명응년간(明應年間)(1492${\sim}$1500)판정운재명유학후(阪淨運在明留학후), 타회도일본적시후(他回到日本的시候), 종명수입(종明수入)"상한잡병론(傷寒雜病論)", 이후일본후세한의칭송료이관동지역적영전덕본(以후日本후世漢醫칭송了以關東地域的永田德本)(1513-1603)위(爲)"고방파적선구자(古方派的先구者)". 도강호시대재일본학술계출현료복고사조(到江戶時代在日本學術係出現了復古思潮). 이등인제(伊藤仁劑)(1627${\sim}$1705)앙망료유학적경전(仰望了儒學的經典), 이차적극지주장료의학적복고(而且積極地主張了醫學的復古), 이후적생조래(以후荻生組徠)(1666${\sim}$1728)대우복여성인적학문부단노력(對于復與聖人的學問不斷努力). 인차복고적학문재덕천시대성위일대학파(因此復古的學問在德川時代成爲一代學派), 18세기상반기시전성시기(18世紀上半期是全盛시期). 주요의가시명고옥현의(主要醫家是名古屋玄議)(1628${\sim}$1696), 후등양산(後藤양山)(1659${\sim}$1733), 산협동양(山脅東洋), 병하천민(병河天民)(1679${\sim}$1719), 송원유악(松原維嶽)(1689${\sim}$1765), 향천수암(香川修庵)(1683${\sim}$1755), 타문복고적유학영향도흔다의학방면(他문復古的儒學影향到흔多의학方面). 중요의가길익동동(重要醫家吉益東洞)(1702${\sim}$1773)도후대피평위고방적'태두'(到后代被평위古方的'泰斗'), 동시'마귀'(同시'魔鬼'). 인차본논문소우황한의학지중"후세파"여반대후세파적"고방파"(因此本論文소于皇漢醫學之中"后世派"與反대后世派的"古方派"), 통과학파명칭여역사지위(通過學派名稱與歷史地位), 주요의가적생애(主要醫家的生涯), 학술적요지(學術的要旨), 저서등(著書等), 이연구병보고타문적학문주장(以硏究병報告他們的學問主張). 이차진저차궤회(而且진저次机회), 상회고아문한의학연착여하역사적궤적(想回고我문韓醫學沿着如何歷史的軌跡).