• Title/Summary/Keyword: 전후방주차지원장치

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

Active Safety Features Evaluation with Korean Drivers (능동 안전장치의 한국 운전자 주행 평가)

  • Lee Hwa Soo;Cho Jae Ho;Yim Jong Hyun;Lee Hong Guk;Chang Kyung Jin;Yoo Song Min
    • Journal of Auto-vehicle Safety Association
    • /
    • v.6 no.1
    • /
    • pp.27-32
    • /
    • 2014
  • A study assessing driver acceptance level for various active safety systems against Korean drivers has been conducted. A 2013 Cadillac ATS model vehicle was tested along southern outskirt of Seoul including local roadway and interurban highway. Active safety systems included were FCA(Forward Collision Alert), LDW(Lane Departure Warning), SBZA(Side Blind Zone Alert), FRPA(Front/Rear Park Assist), RCTA(Rear Cross Traffic Alert), ACC(Adaptive Cruise Control), and AEB(Autonomous Emergency Braking). Participants experienced the FRPA, RCTA and AEB features in a controlled parking lot with a dummy vehicle and traffic cones as target obstacles. Remaining features have been tested on the accumulated stretched of 106 km long urban and interurban roadway. Series of questionnaires corresponding to each active safety systems have been conducted. Tentative results revealed that RCTA and SBZA systems received favourable ratings compared to the other ones.

A Study on the Active Safety Features Assessment through Test Drive (도로 주행평가를 통한 능동 안전장치 연구)

  • Lee, Hwa Soo;Cho, Jae Ho;Yim, Jong Hyun;Lee, Hong Guk;Chang, Kyung Jin;Yoo, Song Min
    • Journal of Auto-vehicle Safety Association
    • /
    • v.7 no.1
    • /
    • pp.33-39
    • /
    • 2015
  • This study examined the drivers' acceptance level of various active safety features with Korean drivers on Seoul urban and city roads. The test vehicle, 2013 Cadillac ATS, was equipped with FCA(Forward Collision Alert), LDW(Lane Departure Warning), SBZA(Side Blind Zone Alert), FRPA(Front/Rear Park Assist), RCTA(Rear Cross Traffic Alert), ACC(Adaptive Cruise Control), and AEB(Autonomous Emergency Braking). Participants had chances to run the tests on those systems in the parking lot accompanied by the 106km long stretch of predetermined route including local road and interurban highway in Seoul and Gyeonggi-do under normal traffic flowing environment. After the test, participants completed a series of questionnaires about the features they experienced. The results revealed that RCTA and SBZA systems received more favourable ratings compared to the other features in avoiding crashes. The respondents preferred sound alerts to haptic ones even though haptic warning methods were better in providing directional information.