• Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology
• /
• 2002.10e
• /
• pp.207-214
• /
• 2002

본 논문은 중심화 이론을 바탕으로 한국어에서 전향적 중심의 서열을 설정하는데 그 목적이 있다. 선행 연구들에서 전향적 중심 서열에 포함시킨 요인들 즉, '주어, 주제, 공감도'를 중심으로 이들 사이의 선호도, 또는 서열에 대한 면밀한 연구가 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 그 요인들 사이의 서열을 비교하는 데에 적합한 담화를 고안한 후 이를 설문 조사를 하였고, 그 결과를 분석하였다. 아울러 본 연구에서는 중심화 이론에서 제안하는 '추이 상태'와 함께 중심으로 해석되는 경향을 고려하였다. 이를 통해 '주제 > 주어 > 목적어'의 전향적 중심 서 열을 얻었다. 또한, 화 청자를 전향적 중심의 서열 설정에 포함시키는 선행 연구를 검토하면서, 화 청자를 포함시키는 대신 담화 분절의 가능성을 제안하는 바이다.

• 한국지구과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2005.02a
• /
• pp.213-222
• /
• 2005

본 연구에서는 고등학생들의 창의성을 신장시키고자 렌줄리의 3단계 학습모형에 적용하여 전향력 탐구활동 프로그램을 개발 하였고, 현장에 적용 후 그 효과를 알아보고자 하였다. 실험집단에는 창의성 신장을 위한 전향력 탐구활동 프로그램을 적용하였고, 통제집단에는 전통적인 교수 학습을 적용하였다. 창의성의 신장 정도와 전향력 개념의 이해 정도를 측정하고자 사전 사후 검사로 창의성은 토렌스의 창의성 검사(TTCT)로, 전향력 개념은 성취도 검사로 알아보았다. 그 결과 실험집단이 전향력 개념 성취도 검사 결과 유의미한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타나고, 창의성 검사(TTCT)에서도 실험집단의 사전 검사보다 사후 검사에서 유의미한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 학생들이 본 수업 프로그램의 과정을 통해 평소 어렵다고 생각했던 전향력 개념을 쉽게 이해할 수 있었기 때문이다. 이러한 연구 결과는 전향력 탐구 활동 프로그램은 고등학생들의 창의성을 신장시키고 전향력 개념에 대한 이해도를 높일 수 있었다고 볼 수 있다.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.21 no.9
• /
• pp.338-344
• /
• 2020

Intolerance of Uncertainty is associated with numerous psychopathologies, including generalized anxiety disorders. However, several studies differ in the factor structures applicable for the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS), and there exists a debate regarding the factorial and construct validity. Thus, in the current study, the IUS was newly translated to explore and verify the structures and factors relative to the cultural background of Korea. The study involved an exploratory factor analysis of randomly extracted data from 260 of 533 adults selected. Results determined that a prospective factor of 3 items and inhibitory factor of 5 items was appropriate. In addition, a confirmatory factor analysis and correlation analysis of the remaining 273 data revealed that a structural model comprising of the 8-items two factors model was well suited (x²=37.699, TLI=0.951, CFI=0.969, RMSEA=0.063, SRMR=0.039), and showed significant static correlation with worry, depression, and state-trait anxiety.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• v.5 no.2
• /
• pp.79-88
• /
• 2005

Quality assurance may be defined as the complete set of systemic actions that is required to achieve a better treatment result by standardizing treatment and by using various audit programs. In general, application of a quality assurance program in surgery is considered to be more difficult than it is in chemotherapy or radiotherapy. However, recently, the importance of quality assurance in the surgical field has been emphasized in clinical trials comparing different surgical procedures and evaluating the role of postoperative adjuvant therapy. In the case of gastric cancer surgery, excellent quality assurance programs have rarely been applied in most large prospective clinical trials. Although the quality assurance in Dutch trial was conducted very systemically and strictly, the situation is quite different from ours. On the other hand, several quality assurance programs in Japanese trials comparing D2 and D2 plus para-arotic lymph node dissection seem to be applicable to Korean clinical trials. Several factors, including selection of appropriate surgeons based on personal experience and annual number of operations, standardization of surgical procedures by education and consensus, development of a unified database program, application of standardized perioperative management, and standardization of pathologic examination, are required to guarantee a successful multi-institutional prospective clinical trial. In contrast, one needs to realize that protocols that are too strict and sophisticated can make the enrollment of patients and surgeons more difficult and can promote protocol violation during the clinical trials. (J Korean Gastric Cancer Assoc 2005;5:79-88)

• 대한위암학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2005.04a
• /
• pp.20-20
• /
• 2005

• 대한치주과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2000.11a
• /
• pp.151-151
• /
• 2000

• 대한위암학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2003.11a
• /
• pp.54-54
• /
• 2003

• 월간산업보건
• /
• s.50
• /
• pp.68-68
• /
• 1992

• 월간산업보건
• /
• s.340
• /
• pp.56-59
• /
• 2016

• 한국노년학
• /
• v.41 no.3
• /
• pp.397-420
• /
• 2021

The paper tried to determine relationships between volunteering and hypertension risks, symptom betterment, activity difficulty occurrences, and medicine treatment among middle-aged and older adults, with a prospective cohort study. Multilevel mixed-effects generalized linear models were used for the analysis of longitudinal panel data collected over 10 years from 2008 to 2018, using 5,867 cohort samples. The results showed that those who volunteered at least 200 hours per year were 3.4 times more lower than not-volunteering in risks of hypertension, those who volunteered yearly 50~99 hours were a lot more improved than not-volunteering in the symptom betterment, those who volunteered yearly at least 200 hours were 7.7 times lower than not-volunteering in activity difficulty occurrences, and those who volunteered yearly 50~99 hours were 2.5 times lower than not-volunteering in the occurrences of medicine treatment. These indicate that volunteering among middle-aged and older adults may have health benefits against incident hypertension. Finally the thesis discusses the study limitations, future directions of studies, and the practices implications.