• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2017.11a
• /
• pp.458-460
• /
• 2017

연구자들이 연구 및 학술활동을 위해서 필연적으로 기존 연구를 검토하고 참조하고 인용하고 있으며, 특히 학술연구물의 하나인 해외 학술저널 및 논문의 활용도가 매우 높은 편이다. 그러나 해외 학술정보 시장은 대형 출판사의 주도로 시장이 형성되고 독과점 형태로 운영됨에 따라 그 비용이 계속 상승하고 있고 이와 반대로 국내에서의 해외 저널에 대한 예산은 계속해서 줄어들고 있는 실정이다. 이러한 문제점 해결을 위해 국가 차원의 KESLI 컨소시엄(전자정보 공동구매 및 활용 체제)을 구성하여 전자정보 공동구매의 장을 구축하였다. 본 연구에서는 대학교육협의회, 전문도서관 등 컨소시엄 운영주체의 다변화에 대한 대응과 구매의사결정 지원을 강화하고 대체 정보자원의 제공 등 기존의 KESLI 시스템을 개선하여 대학도서관, 전문도서관, 연구소, 기업 그리고 학술정보 출판사 및 공급사의 전자정보 공동구매 활성화 및 이용자 만족도를 제고하였다.

• Journal of Information Management
• /
• v.37 no.4
• /
• pp.49-67
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this study is to select factors that its impact on subscription of the package type e-journal in Korea. In order to accomplish this study, factors to select the package-type electronic journal are discussed through preceded research literatures, and presented the factors for subscription of the package-type electronic journal based on KESLI materials. As a result, ten evaluation categories and thirty-four evaluation factors are selected as e-journal evaluation elements.

• Journal of Information Management
• /
• v.40 no.3
• /
• pp.99-123
• /
• 2009

A core point of the KESLI consortium raises the participation score of the joining institute and improves the cohesive force and reliability to cope with prices continued rising of publishers, commonly and gives the actual profit to the joining institute by providing the base able to utilize the academic information with dispersion owning the national institutes. In this study the whole opinion of the consortium joining institute is collected in the future in order to deduce the reasonable and advantageous consortium model in which the consortium joining institute can be commonly applied. The facing task of the KESLI consortium is analyzed through a literature research, a questionnaire survey, a panel discussion and we try to present.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.47 no.4
• /
• pp.187-210
• /
• 2013

The consumption through e-journal consortia makes researchers locate and use academic resources and information extensively with comparatively cheap costs. This study analyzed and investigated substantive benefits of the big deal contracts for e-journal subscriptions in terms of efficient information use. In other words, this study compare concretely the differences in efficiency of using information between large-size institutions and small-size institutions who participate in the e-journal big deal contracts. This study suggests solutions for the problems which occur persistently and repeatedly in the big deal and new counter plans which can replace the current methods of big deal contracts in a long-term perspective by revealing the gaps of acquiring and using information by the size of participating institutions.