• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Quality Management Conference
• /
• 1998.11a
• /
• pp.453-462
• /
• 1998

한국 품질경영의 추진현황을 파악하고 향후 발전방향을 모색하기 위해서 최근에 산학관에 있는 품질관련 전문가그룹을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 본 발표는 설문조사 과정을 소개하고 설문조사의 결과를 품질경영 정의, 추진현황, 그리고 향후 발전방향으로 분류하여 제시한다. 본 연구의 의미는 그간 경험적으로 판단되어 왔던 핵심 품질활동에 대한 전문가 그룹의 견해를 설문조사를 통해서 확인하였다는 점과 이를 근거로 향후 발전방향을 제시하였다는 것이다.

• Journal of the Korean Applied Science and Technology
• /
• v.38 no.2
• /
• pp.423-433
• /
• 2021

The purpose of this study was to establish the concept of self-management in beauty service experts through two integrated research methods of open-ended questionnaires and focus group interview. For data collection, an open-ended questionnaire was conducted for 151 beauty service experts located in Seoul·Gyeonggi-do, and a focus group interview was conducted with 8 experts in beauty experts to collect data. Accordingly, the results derived through a series of research procedures are as follows. First, as a result of the inductive content analysis of the open questionnaire, the self-management of beauty service experts was derived into four types of intellectual management: health management, interpersonal management, appearance management, and technology management. Second, in the results of the focus group interview, the inductive content analysis was more validly supported, and the beauty service field-centered interview cases were dealt with in-depth, resulting in two additional attributes of contactless management and knowledge management. The results of this study can be used as basic data for establishing strategies for life as a successful professional of beauty service workers and developing self-management measurement tools for beauty service experts.

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
• /
• v.46 no.5
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study was to identify differences of perceptions for gardens and parks between experts and the general public concerning several aspects including scope, scale, publicity, artistic and scientific nature, main materials, practicality and aesthetics, executive and management systems as well as legal understanding of garden and park. The properties of garden and park were derived through literature research, and the concept, similarity, and difference of gardens and the parks were recognized by the experts and the public viewpoint was clarified by questionnaire. As for the difference in the scope of the gardens and the parks, the expert group recognized it more widely than the general public. In general, the space recognized as a garden was the rooftop green space, and urban forests were recognized as a park. In addition, the general public recognized urban forests as gardens the same as they recognized parks, and the distinction was unclear. In the expert group, the perception that gardens were small and the parks were large was more prevalent. It was generally recognized that gardens were private spaces and the parks were public spaces. In the expert group, the gardens were more personal and the parks were more apparent to the public. In the general population, functional and scientific aspects rather than artistic creativity in both gardens and parks. In addition, both the general public and experts found that parks are more complex than gardens. The garden was centered on plant material, and the park was recognized as a center where the sculptural facilities were centered, or the plant material and the sculptural facilities were properly balanced. To the experts the view of the gardens was positive. Expert groups emphasized the aesthetics of the garden, and the parks were more practical, and the general population showed similar perceptions of utility and aesthetics when comparing gardens and parks. In addition, the utility of gardens in the general publics is more emphasized than the aesthetics of the park. Regarding the executive system the park was recognized as the public sector, and the difference was larger in the expert group. As for the management system, both experts and the general public perceive the management of the park or the garden to be carried out by the supporting organization, and it is necessary to discuss the diversification of the management subject. It is found that there is a certain difference in recognition with the mixture of concepts, and there is still a big difference in legal system and perception.

• Journal of Navigation and Port Research
• /
• v.41 no.4
• /
• pp.207-214
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study was to propose appropriate requirements to obtain a pilot's license in order to improve the safety of pilotage related to a survey of experts involved with pilotage. The survey has been conducted by experts from stakeholders in various fields. To suggest requirements for the license, a hypothesis test has been conducted. It turns out that onboard experience with higher gross tonnage is eligible for pilot. Secondly, it is required to have onboard experience of more than one year as a captain, within 5 years from the date that the individual takes the pilot's written test, with 5 years onboard experience as a captain. Lastly, if personality and aptitude tests are added to the requirements to obtain a pilot's license, the safety of pilotage will increase rapidly.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.13 no.3
• /
• pp.468-484
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this study was to examine the problems of a multi-cultural family counseling as a support for the families in order to suggest efficient education programs for counselors. For these reasons, this study used interviews of three focus-groups consisting of 11 experts each other, and then the qualitative data was analyzed. The analysis of data was conducted by two doctors and one master and investigated by a multi-cultural counselor. As a result, 5 categories, 13 sub-categories, and 46 definitions were identified. Each five categories were the problems of multi-cultural counseling, effective multi-cultural counseling skill, the qualities of a counselor with multi-cultural attitude and recognition, multi-cultural knowledge factors and effective teaching methods. At last, implications, practical uses, and suggestions for future researches were also discussed in this study.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.445-462
• /
• 2019

This paper illustrated the use of focus groups with adolescents and youth experts to enhance knowledge of anger, anger expression, and its coping strategies. Nine youth experts and 9 adolescents participated in the study. Analysis of the findings identified 12 meaningful elements, 34 sub-elements, and 138 descriptions. The meaningful elements were as follow: the lack of stable care, anger-provoking situations, a relationship between distorted thoughts and anger, physical and psychological symptoms, different types of anger expression, suppressed anger, difficulty of anger control, youth efforts to control anger, needs to implement appropriate anger expression, psychological mechanism of anger, effective ways to cope with anger, suggested by youth experts, needs of alternative anger management programs. Based on these findings, the study suggests various anger management alternatives, including ICT based cognitive-behavior anger management programs.

• Smart Media Journal
• /
• v.12 no.9
• /
• pp.116-123
• /
• 2023

In this study, I will describe the difference in operating methods centered on the game operating system between beginners and expert groups in MORPG PC games and focus on the methodology to analyze them. First of all, a hypothesis was established to distinguish between beginners and expert groups based on the manipulation system of character movements commonly used in MORPG, and through this distinction, it was analyzed whether finger movement data and key stroke data related to the manipulation system can be significantly used in the future. Based on these analysis results, it was found that the analysis methodology that combines finger motion data and key stroke analysis is meaningful as a user test methodology for the PC MORPG game operating system in the future.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.21 no.8
• /
• pp.177-183
• /
• 2021

This empirical study aims to find the factors to affect purchasing dairy products between the expert group and consumer group and also find the difference between the groups and the reasons, using AHP. Based on the results of the previous studies, four main factors were selected and they are products, marketing, quality, and social factors. Then, we surveyed the groups of consumers and experts, conducted AHP analysis, and compared the gaps between the groups. The factor of marketing, especially the sub-factor of brand, was found out the most biggest difference, followed by the sub-factor of hygiene in the factor of quality. The results of this study can contribute to the dairy industry to see the difference between the expert and consumer groups' choices.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.29 no.6C
• /
• pp.287-294
• /
• 2009

Suction Drain Method is a relatively new technique to improve soft ground using vacuum pressure which can be directly applied to the soft ground through drains that the pore water pressure around them are decreased without changing total stress. This can accelerate volume changes and increase strength of the ground. This paper shows the results of field test of the suction drain method applied at dredged and reclaimed clay. To evaluate the improvement effects of soft ground by the suction drain method, this paper analyzed real-time field measurements to the results of the laboratory tests and numerical analysis. The comparisons of the settlement and shear strength between suction drain method and surcharge preloading method show possibilities for replacement of the preloading methods. The settlements by suction drain method were 2.3 times larger and undrained shear strength were 300%~400% higher than surcharge method. Moreover, the water content is decreased about 30% and the preconsolidation pressure is increased about $0.52kgf/cm^2$.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2018.11a
• /
• pp.355-356
• /
• 2018

본 연구에서는 국내 항만보안 효율성을 측정하기 위한 사전연구로 항만보안에 있어서 중요 평가항목을 선정하고 평가하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 문헌조사 및 관계자들의 인터뷰를 통해 평가항목을 선정하였고, 이들 항목을 4개의 대분류와 12개의 중분류로 분류하였다. 다음으로 해양수산부 공무원, 항만공사 직원, 학계 관계자들로 구성된 전문가들의 설문조사를 통해 평가항목에 대하여 AHP 기법을 이용하여 중요도를 산출하였다. 상위 수준의 중요도 산출결과, 해양수산부 공무원 그룹과 항만공사 직원 그룹은 시설 지원 항목의 중요도가 높았으며 학계 관계자 그룹의 경우 인력예산 지원 항목의 중요도가 높았다. 하위 수준 항목의 종합중요도 분석 결과, 해양수산부 공무원 그룹과 항만공사 직원 그룹에서는 항만 내 통합시스템 구축 및 유관기관 간의 협조를 통한 운영시스템 강화의 순위가 가장 높았으나, 학계 관계자 그룹의 경우 보안인력들의 처우개선이 가장 높은 순위로 나타났다.