• 대한치과보철학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2002.11a
• /
• pp.63-63
• /
• 2002

• The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
• /
• v.49 no.3
• /
• pp.263-269
• /
• 2011

The digital impression technique has been developed for more precise restorations and convenient procedures in prosthodontic treatment compared to the conventional impression technique. Along with the utilization of CAD/CAM, the introduction of digital impression technique actualizes the digitalization of dental treatments. This case is to compare two different prostheses introducing each procedure in detail; one from CAD/CAM after taking digital impression and the other from the conventional technique. A 22-year-old female visited the clinic with the chief complaint of correction of discoloration and shape on maxillary right central incisor. Due to the trauma 8 years ago, the tooth was endodontically treated with post and resin core. The treatment was planned and the procedures were conducted under the patient's consent to treat the tooth with all ceramic crowns in two different ways for comparison. In conclusion, both prostheses presented clinically acceptable results with comparing the internal fitness of two all ceramic crowns. The prosthesis from digital impression, however, showed more errors in respect of internal fitness.

• The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
• /
• v.53 no.2
• /
• pp.105-110
• /
• 2015

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 3 dimensional accuracy of impression taking on the newly developed healing abutment and impression coping combined system comparing conventional pick-up type impression. Materials and methods: For 10 patients who had a single missing tooth on molar area, dental implants (SuperLine; Dentium, Seoul, Korea) were placed and healing abutment (MyHealing; Raphabio Co., Seoul, Korea) abutments were connected. After 3 months, transfer type impression with MyHealing and pick-up type impression with impression coping were performed twice in the same patients, and master models were fabricated. Customized prosthetic abutments (Myplant; Raphabio Co., Seoul, Korea) were milled and connected to the master casts. Through a dental scanner (Scanner S600; Zirkonzahn, South Tyrol, Italy), the master casts were converted into virtual casts. The length and angulation differences between casts were measured using 3 dimentional analysis program (Geomagic Qualify 12; Geomagic, Morrisville, NC, USA). Statistical significance was calculated using Kruskal Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test (${\alpha}$=.05). Results: The length differences between the two systems were 0.032 mm in sagittal plane, and 0.029 in coronal plane, and 0.023 mm in horizontal plane. The angulation differences were $0.755^{\circ}$ in sagittal plane, and $1.275^{\circ}$ in coronal plane, and $0.420^{\circ}$ in horizontal plane. Conclusion: The accuracy of newly developed healing abutment system is similar to that of conventional pick-up impression. The new system can reduces chair time by not using separate impression coping.

• Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science
• /
• v.36 no.1
• /
• pp.29-40
• /
• 2020

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of impression taking method using the encoded healing abutment, scan body and pick-up impression coping with different implant angulations. Materials and Methods: Master model was fabricated by 3D printer and three implants were placed into the model with 0°, 10° and 20° mesial angulation. The abutments were secured to each implants and master model was scanned to make a reference model. Group P model was fabricated using pick-up impression copings and model was scanned after securing the abutments. Encoded healing abutment (Group E) and scan body (Group S) were secured on the master model and digital impression was taken using intraoral scanner 15 times each. Each STL files of test groups were superimposed with reference model using best fit alignment and root mean square (RMS) value was analyzed. Results: The RMS values were lowest in Group P, followed by Group S and Group E. Group P showed significant difference with Group S and E (P < 0.05) while there was no significant difference between Group S and E. Correlation between implant angulation and RMS value was significant in Group E (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The pick-up impression coping method showed higher accuracy and there was no significant difference in accuracy between the healing abutment and the scan body. The clinical use of the encoded healing abutment is possible, but it should be used with caution in the case of angulated implant.

• The Journal of the Korean dental association
• /
• v.47 no.4
• /
• pp.206-210
• /
• 2009

앞에서 임프란트 주변 연조직의 형태를 작업모형에서 재현하기 위한 몇가지 방법을 살펴 보았다. 심미성이 점차 강조되고 있는 추세에 비추어 단순하게 치아의 심미성 보다는 전반적으로 연조직과 경조직이 잘 조화되는 수복물이 요구되고 있다. 잘 만들어진 작업모형은 좀 더 심미적이고 안정된 결과를 얻을 수 있도록 도움이 될 것이다.

• The Journal of the Korean dental association
• /
• v.15 no.5
• /
• pp.323-324
• /
• 1977

• The Journal of the Korean dental association
• /
• v.15 no.6
• /
• pp.389-391
• /
• 1977

• The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
• /
• v.8 no.1
• /
• pp.107-108
• /
• 1968

• The Journal of the Korean dental association
• /
• v.15 no.4
• /
• pp.261-263
• /
• 1977

• 대한치과보철학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 1999.04a
• /
• pp.51-51
• /
• 1999