Maxillary anterior all ceramic restoration using digital impression and CAD/CAM |
Pyo, Se-Wook
(Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Park, Young-Bum (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) Kim, Jee-Hwan (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) Moon, Hong-Suk (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) Lee, Keun-Woo (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) |
1 | Henkel GL. A comparison of fixed prostheses generated from conventional vs digitally scanned dental impressions. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2007;28:422-4, 426-8, 430-1. |
2 | Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204:505-11. DOI ScienceOn |
3 | Christensen GJ. Marginal fit of gold inlay castings. J Prosthet Dent 1966;16:297-305. DOI ScienceOn |
4 | Moon BH, Yang JH, Lee SH, Chung HY. A study on the marginal fit of all-ceramic crown using CCD camera. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1998;36:273-92. |
5 | McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131:107-11. DOI ScienceOn |
6 | Sorensen JA. A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:18-24. DOI ScienceOn |
7 | Molin M, Karlsson S. The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. A clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:201-6. DOI ScienceOn |
8 | Rahme HY, Tehini GE, Adib SM, Ardo AS, Rifai KT. In vitro evaluation of the "replica technique" in the measurement of the fit of Procera crowns. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008;9:25-32. |
9 | Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2010;38:553-9. DOI ScienceOn |
10 | Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 2009;28:44-56. DOI ScienceOn |
11 | Christensen GJ. The state of fixed prosthodontic impressions: room for improvement. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:343-6. DOI |
12 | Christensen GJ. Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140:1301-4. DOI |
13 | Cadent iTero Digital Impression System and Virtual 3-D Dentistry[Internet]. Carlstadt, NJ 07072; 2007. Available at: www.cadent.biz |
14 | Jeffrey BD. The future of impressions. Dental Economics 2007 June 1. Available at: www.dentaleconomics.com |
15 | Garg AK. Cadent iTero's digital system for dental impressions: the end of trays and putty? Dent Implantol Update 2008;19:1-4. |