• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.27 no.3
• /
• pp.180-189
• /
• 2007

This study investigated the influences of reciprocal peer tutoring (RPT) strategy on middle school students' science achievement, self-efficacy, perception of instruction by grouping method and science achievement level. Eighth graders from a middle school in Seoul were assigned to comparison, homogeneous RPT, and heterogeneous RPT groups. The students were taught about 'separation of mixtures' for 8 class hours. After the instructions, a science achievement test consisting of three subtests (knowledge, understanding, and application), a self-efficacy test, and a questionnaire about the perception of instruction were administered. The analysis of the results revealed that the scores of heterogeneous RPT group, regardless of the students prior science achievement level, were significantly higher than those of the other groups in the knowledge and understanding subtests, and the self-efficacy test. The scores of homogeneous RPT group were significantly higher than those of the comparison group in the knowledge subtest but not in the understanding subtest and the self-efficacy test. The low-level students in heterogeneous RPT group performed better in the science achievement test and the application subtest than those in the other groups. The high-level students in RPT groups performed better in the science achievement test than those in comparison group. However, there was no significant difference for the application subtest scores of the high-level students of the three groups. Most students in RPT groups perceived positively on the instructions. The students in heterogeneous RPT group and low-level students especially showed more positive perception of the instruction than those in homogeneous RPT group and high-level students.

• Proceedings of the Korean Environmental Sciences Society Conference
• /
• 2017.10a
• /
• pp.175-175
• /
• 2017

• Journal of the Korean Chemical Society
• /
• v.51 no.2
• /
• pp.186-192
• /
• 2007

In this study, the effects of concept mapping on the preservice elementary teachers' achievement, conceptual understanding, anxiety toward science, and science teaching efficacy belief were investigated in the undergraduate general chemistry course. The aptitude-treatment interaction (ATI) between preservice teachers' learning approach and concept mapping strategy was also investigated. Sixty-nine freshmen from a university of education were assigned to a control group and a treatment group. Tests regarding students' learning approach, anxiety toward science, and science teaching efficacy belief were administered as pretests. Treatment lasted for 9 weeks. In every class, students in the treatment group constructed concept maps, while those in the control group solved the problems of the textbook after the lecture. After the instructions, tests of achievement, conceptual understanding, anxiety toward science, and science teaching efficacy beliefs were administered. The results indicated that students in the treatment group significantly outperformed those of the control group in the achievement test. In the conceptual understanding and the science teaching efficacy beliefs, however, no statistically significant differences were found between two groups. Students of the treatment group showed significantly higher anxiety than their counterpart in the test of anxiety toward science. No aptitudetreatment interaction between students' learning approach and the concept mapping strategy was found.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.37 no.1
• /
• pp.25-37
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects on particulate concept formation based on abductive reasoning model for elementary science class. For this study, an author selected two groups in the sixth grade. One group is an ordinary textbook-based control group (N=26) and the other group is an abductive reasoning model-based treatment group (N=26). After twelve lessons, the scores of Concepts Test for Gas were analyzed by t-test and two-way ANOVA. The result of t-test showed both the control and treatment groups have higher score than before they take the lesson. But after the lesson, an author found out that the treatment group had higher score than that of the control group. And compared to the number of particles expressed, the number of the treatment group were higher than that of the control class. The two-way ANOVA result revealed that the interaction effect between their cognitive level and treatment was not significant. And regardless of the level of cognition, the scores of treatment group are higher than those of control group. Therefore, abductive reasoning model-based elementary science class were found to be more effective for particulate concept formation. Based on the results, an author concluded that abductive reasoning model is very effective in teaching particulate concepts to elementary students.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.19 no.2
• /
• pp.305-314
• /
• 1999

The effects of three teaching models were compared in this research. One of those is concept change model, another is concept change model based on students learning motivations, the other is traditional teaching method based on science textbooks. The subjects of this research were the 8th grade students of Korean middle school. They were divided into three groups, and tested learning motivations. All of the three groups improved their learning motivations and concept understanding by the classes. Especially, the group of concept change model based on students learning motivations represented most effective improvement of learning motivations. The concept change teaching model and concept change teaching model based on students learning motivations are more effective in concept understanding than traditional teaching method based on textbooks. The students who have high learning motivations improved their concept understanding by the classes of concept change model based on students learning motivations. The students who have low learning motivations improved their learning motivations by the classes of concept change model based on students learning motivations also.

• KDI Journal of Economic Policy
• /
• v.10 no.2
• /
• pp.65-90
• /
• 1988

본고(本稿)는 정책행태(政策行態)에 대한 정치경제학적(政治經濟學的) 접근방법(接近方法)을 이용하여 지금까지 우리나라의 시장개방(市場開放)에 대한 수요(需要) 공급(供給) 및 실제시장개방(實際市場開放)의 결정요인(決定要因)을 실증적으로 분석하고 이를 바탕으로 시장개방정책(市場開放政策)의 행태(行態)를 분석하였다. 로짓분석(分析)에 의한 실증분석결과는 정치경제학적(政治經濟學的) 접근방법(接近方法)의 타당성을 강하게 지지하는 것으로 나타났으며, 이 결과에 의하면 우리나라의 시장개방정책(市場開放政策)은 경제원칙(經濟原則)에 입각하여 추진되었다는 측면을 완전히 배제할 수는 없지만 정치경제학적(政治經濟學的) 요인(要因)들-국내이해관련집단들의 자기비호(自己庇護) 주장(主張)이나 미국(美國)의 개방압력(開放壓力) 등-에 의해 왜곡(歪曲)되었던 것으로 나타났다. 특히 '공정무역(公定貿易)'의 기폭하(旗幅下)에 가해지고 있는 미국(美國)의 개방압력(開放壓力)은 오히려 미국기업(美國企業)들의 이해관계(利害關係)를 대변함으로써, 그리고 국내이해관련집단의 관심을 고조시킴으로써 시장개방(市場開放)의 합리적(合理的) 원칙(原則)의 견지를 더 어렵게 하였던 것으로 관찰되었다. 또한 분석결과(分析結果)에 이하면 금후의 경제민주화(經濟民主化) 추세(趨勢)의 진전(進展)으로 개방정책(開放政策)을 포함하는 일반경제정책(一般經濟政策)의 입안(立案), 추진(推進)에 있어 이해관련집단들의 역할이 증대될 것이기 때문에 이는 자칫하면 정책방향(政策方向) 왜곡(歪曲) 및 집행(執行)의 효율성(效率成) 저하(低下)를 초래할 수도 있다는 시사를 주고 있다.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.27 no.7
• /
• pp.631-638
• /
• 2007

This study investigated the influences of a student-centered analogical instruction using physical analogies upon students' conception and application, retention of conception and application, perceptions of science classroom environment, and perceptions of analogical instruction. Six classes of seventh graders (N=208) at a middle school in Seoul were assigned to the control, the teacher-centered analogy (TCA), and the student-centered analogy (SCA) groups. They were taught about 'three states of matter' and 'motion of molecules' for 8 class hours. Analysis of the results revealed that the scores of the SCA group were significantly higher than those of the other groups in the conception test, retention test of conception and application, and perception test of science classroom environment. The scores of the SCA group in the application test were also higher than those of the other groups, but there was a significant difference only between the control and the SCA groups. The TCA group performed significantly better than the control group only in the test of the retention of application. In addition, the students in the SCA group exhibited more positive perceptions of the analogical instruction than those in the TCA group. Educational implications are discussed.

• Science of Emotion and Sensibility
• /
• v.19 no.4
• /
• pp.83-94
• /
• 2016

The aim of this study was to investigate effective expression method of performance information of functional clothing and preferred alternatives for the categorized consumer groups according to the perception about the functional outdoor jacket. 472 males and females in their 20s-60s' were surveyed and their answers were analysed and categorized by using SPSS 21.0 statistical program. For the study, four different expression methods for waterproof & breathable fabric, 'illustration only', 'illustration+Korean text', 'illustration+foreign text', and 'chart with Korean text', were presented and asked for finding correct answers. The analysis was done for three categorized consumer groups from the former study, 'unconversant/brand & design pursuing group', 'conversant/function pursuing group' and 'high price/high function preferring group'. The results showed that regardless of groups, 'picture only' was the most preferred method and 'graph' was the least. However, the percentage of correct answers for the 'graph' was the biggest, especially for 'conversant/function pursuing group'. It implied that the effective expression method should be differentiated depending on the target consumer groups. 'Conversant/function pursuing group' more agreed on the need for additional information, such as 'after-washed performance', than other two groups.

• Journal of the Korean Chemical Society
• /
• v.50 no.4
• /
• pp.338-345
• /
• 2006

study investigated the effect of an instruction using generating analogy on scientific conceptual understanding, science learning motivation, attitude toward science instruction, and perception of instruction. Two classes of seventh graders at a middle school in Seoul were randomly assigned to the treatment group and the control group, and they were taught about the motion of molecules for 5 class hours. The instruction for treatment group was developed based on the Glynns Teaching-With-Analogy model. Two-way ANCOVA results revealed that the scores of the treatment group were significantly higher than those of the control group in the conception test. However, there was no significant difference between two groups in the science learning motivation test and the test on the attitude toward science instruction. Survey results on the students perception of instruction showed that generating analogy was hard for the greater part of students, and finding appropriate analog was the most difficult work. Educational implications are discussed.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.23 no.3
• /
• pp.246-253
• /
• 2003

This study investigated the influences of role-playing analogy upon students' scientific conceptual understandings, application abilities, retentions of conception and application, and learning motivation. Four classes of 7th grade at a middle school in Seoul were assigned to control and treatment groups, and taught about 'motion of molecules' for 4 class hours. For the Treatment group, role-playing analogy instruction was used. The traditional instruction was used for the control group. Data analysis indicated that the scores of the treatment group were significantly higher than those of the control group in the tests on the conception, the retention of application, and the confidence. In the tests of the application, attention, and relevance, there were significant interactions between instruction and student' gender. Both female and male students in the treatment group scored significantly higher than those in the control group in the application test. In the case of attention and relevance tests, male students in the treatment group scored significantly higher than those in the control group. Educational implications are discussed.