• Journal of Korea Fair Competition Federation
• /
• no.38
• /
• pp.22-24
• /
• 1998

• Korean Architects
• /
• no.9 s.210
• /
• pp.34-36
• /
• 1986

본문은 지난 호에 소개한 뒤를 이어 공정거래와 관련한 업무추진 현황을 회원 여러분에게 알리기 위한 것으로 공정거래 위원회의 시정조치에 대하여 본 협회가 9월9일자로 제출한 이의 신청내용 전문입니다.

• 발명특허
• /
• v.6 no.2 s.60
• /
• pp.30-31
• /
• 1981

• 발명특허
• /
• v.1 no.8 s.8
• /
• pp.8-10
• /
• 1976

• Journal of the Korean hospital association
• /
• v.17 no.11 s.159
• /
• pp.35-40
• /
• 1988

• Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety
• /
• v.25 no.6
• /
• pp.708-716
• /
• 2019

After the Sewol ferry disaster, the maritime safety supervisor system was introduced to strengthen maritime safety control for coastal vessels. If any critical defect is found in vessel facilities during periodical or occasional guidance and supervision on a vessel, a maritime safety supervisor takes an administrative measure: detention of the vessel until it has been completely corrected. The detention order is one of the most powerful regulations exercised by a maritime safety supervisor. It would not be an overstatement to say that the guidance and supervision conducted by a maritime safety supervisor is very important for the safety of a vessel and protection of the maritime environment. However, the regulatory level of each Regional Office of Oceans and Fisheries toward vessels may vary with the enforcers, and an individual's intentional act or negligence might occur during the execution process. Detention of a coastal vessel by the Regional Office of Ocean and Fisheries can easily lead to delayed navigation, and a vessel owner may suffer economic loss from suspension of a charter party. Nevertheless, the Maritime Safety Act does not prescribe filing a petition for objection to the measure of detention order by a maritime safety supervisor. To overcome this problem, therefore, the objection procedure under the Maritime Safety Act has to be reformed to reclaim a right against an inappropriate detention order measure caused by an individual's intentional act or negligence through a formal objection.

• 발명특허
• /
• v.13 no.9 s.151
• /
• pp.46-48
• /
• 1988

• 발명특허
• /
• v.10 no.11 s.117
• /
• pp.18-21
• /
• 1985

요즈음 우리나라에서도 특허에 대한 관심이 급속히 높아지고 있다. 기업의 대소를 불문하고 권리에 대하여 민감해저 출원이나 이의신청 등이 증가되고 라이센싱 업무가 활발해지고 있다. 이러한 시대에서 기업간의 경쟁에서 우위를 차지하기 위해서는 독점권을 확보하거나, 타사의 독접권에 대한 대책을 수립하지 않으면 안된다. 여기에서 특허관리가 필요한 것이며 오늘날과 같이 기술경쟁이 극심한 사회에서는 특허관리의 양부에 따라 기업의 존망이 좌우된다고 말할 수 있다.

• The Inventors News
• /
• no.29
• /
• pp.2-2
• /
• 2004

`기능성 안경` 특허 출원 증가 - 웰빙 주도하는 `체지방 측정기` 출원 꾸준히 증가 - 케이블TV방송협회, `BSIDMC 특허` 이의 신청 - 베스킨 라빈스, 빙그레 상대 상표권 소송 - `상황버섯$\cdot$강낭콩 특허 내고 쓰세요`

• The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
• /
• no.68
• /
• pp.73-105
• /
• 2021

The aim of this study was to investigate the current state of operation of information disclosure system in Busan Metropolitan Police Agency and to suggest recommendations for improvement. To achieve this goal, this study quantitatively analyzed the data on information disclosure claims (2010~2020.6), appeal cases (2010~2020.6), the disclosure rate of original documents (2014~2019) and so on. Furthermore, it examined how and how much information is announced in advance through the agency's homepage and the information disclosure portal site. Results show that the agency has various problems regarding information disclosure including the high rate of transferring information to other institutions, the low disclosure rate of original documents, the high rate of information released publicly only after an administrative appeal, a small number of information announced in advance, and a not user-friendly website. To solve these problems, this study proposes providing accurate information about the scope of information the agency and other related institutions own, expanding the disclosure of original documents, discovering more information to announce in advance, and enhancing the usability of the website.