• The Journal of the Acoustical Society of Korea
• /
• v.42 no.4
• /
• pp.271-284
• /
• 2023

This study compared 431 acoustic terminology of South Korean industrial standards and North Korean national standards based on IEC 60050-801:1994 international standards. In addition, this study attempted to integrate acoustic terminology between the two Koreas. There were 139 (32.3 %) AA types with exactly the same form of terminology, 35 (8.1 %) Aa types with different spellings due to differences in linguistic norms, and 257 (59.6 %) AB types with completely different forms. Morphologically, there were more than twice as many different types of terminology as the same type. In the integration of acoustic terminology with different forms, 178 (61 %) North Korean terminology and 76 (26 %) South Korean terminology were adopted. we would like to overcome the limitations of this study through the following suggestions. First, the government should support academic exchanges between the two Koreas and encourage the establishment of common standards for acoustic terminology. Second, efforts should be made to share acoustic terminology data between the two Koreas and publish an integrated acoustic terminology dictionary. Third, South and North Korea should jointly launch a terminology committee to make efforts to revise international standards together.

• Proceedings of the Acoustical Society of Korea Conference
• /
• autumn
• /
• pp.321-324
• /
• 1999

동일한 것을 지칭하는 용어가 여러 분야에서 서로 다른 이름으로 불리고, 심지어는 한 분야 내에서도 여러 가지 이름을 가지고 불린다는 것은 학습에 큰 부담이 될 뿐만아니라, 전문가 사이의 의사소통을 지연시키는 등 정보화에 엄청난 걸림돌이 된다. 본 연구에서는 음성학에서 기본이 되는 발음기관을 지칭하는 우리말 용어들이 각 분야에서 어떻게 쓰이고 있는가를 알아 보고, 그 통일 방안을 모색해 보려는 데 목적이 있다. 이를 위하여 발음기관을 부위별로 나누어 어떠한 용어들이 어떤 분야에서 쓰이고 있는지를 상세히 알아 볼 것이다.