• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.13 no.9
• /
• pp.149-159
• /
• 2015

This paper aims to examine the relationships between Leader Supervisory Style, Creativity and Job Involvement in the age of convergence. In addition, this study examined the moderating effects of Leader-Member Exchange. To accomplish these purposes, the main factors of the Leader Supervisory Style were found from the previous studies. The following are the summary of hypothesis test : First, Leader Supervisory Style have differential influence on Creativity. Second, Leader Supervisory Style have differential influence on Job Involvement. Third, the moderating effects of Leader-Member Exchange have partially moderated effect on the relationship between Leader Supervisory Style and Creativity. Forth, the moderating effects of LMX Leader-Member Exchange have partially moderated effect on the relationship between Leader Supervisory Style and Job Involvement. Therefore, the results of this study have many theoretical and practical implications.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.13 no.10
• /
• pp.107-120
• /
• 2015

In this paper, we study the conflict management plan of the organization in the age of convergence. More specifically, we reveal the impact of the conflict according to behavior of the leader. To this purpose, The behavior of the leader were classified as Supportive Leader and Controlled Leader, and forms of Resistance wert classified as Functional Resistance and Dysfunctional Resistance that results of the conflict. Also, Psychological Contract Violation and Breach was set up as a mediate variable. The results were as follows. First, When employee resistance comes up in the organization, Support behavior of Leaders leads to desirable changes in the organization through the functional and constructive resistance. In contrast, Controlled behavior of Leaders leads the destructive and dysfunctional resistance of employee. Second, Since the perception that the follower is receiving assistance to leaders, it reduces the perception of psychological contract violation, but Controlled leader is largely perceived as the Psychological Contract Violation to the followers. Third, Supportive Leader is not influence the affect of employee, and They resolve the Conflict in objective and positive way. Therefore, the results of this study have many theoretical and practical implications.