Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.9.149

A Study on the influence of Leader Supervisory Style to Creativity and Job Involvement in the age of Convergence  

Solongo, Erdenebaatar (Dept. of Business School, Kumoh National Institute of Technologyt)
Lee, Sun-Kyu (Dept. of Business School, Kumoh National Institute of Technologyt)
Kang, Eun-Gu (Dept. of Business School, Kumoh National Institute of Technologyt)
Kim, Hong-Cheul (Kumoh National Institute of Technology)
Kim, Eun-Kyeong (Dept. of Business School, Kumoh National Institute of Technologyt)
Publication Information
Journal of Digital Convergence / v.13, no.9, 2015 , pp. 149-159 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper aims to examine the relationships between Leader Supervisory Style, Creativity and Job Involvement in the age of convergence. In addition, this study examined the moderating effects of Leader-Member Exchange. To accomplish these purposes, the main factors of the Leader Supervisory Style were found from the previous studies. The following are the summary of hypothesis test : First, Leader Supervisory Style have differential influence on Creativity. Second, Leader Supervisory Style have differential influence on Job Involvement. Third, the moderating effects of Leader-Member Exchange have partially moderated effect on the relationship between Leader Supervisory Style and Creativity. Forth, the moderating effects of LMX Leader-Member Exchange have partially moderated effect on the relationship between Leader Supervisory Style and Job Involvement. Therefore, the results of this study have many theoretical and practical implications.
Keywords
Support Leader; Controlling Leader; Creativity; Job-Involvement; Leader-Member Exchange; Leader Supervisory Style in the convergence age;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Amabile & Gryskiewicz, Creativity in the R & D laboratory, Center for Creative Leadership. Technical Report No.30, 1987.
2 Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of management journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of management journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Baer, M., & Oldham, G. R. (2006). The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 963.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Carson, K. D., Carson, P. P., & Bedeian, A. G. (1995). Development and construct validation of a career entrenchment measure. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 68(4), 301-320.   DOI
6 Chen, G., & Klimoski, R. J. (2003). The impact of expectations on newcomer performance in teams as mediated by work characteristics, social exchanges, and empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 591-607.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Cohen, S. (1995). Denial and acknowledgement: the impact of information about human rights violations. Center for Human Rights, Hebrew University.
8 Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
9 Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of personality and social psychology, 53(6), 1024.   DOI
10 Deci, E. L., Schwartz, A. J., Sheinman, L., & Ryan, R. M. (1981). An instrument to assess adults' orientations toward control versus autonomy with children: Reflections on intrinsic motivation and perceived competence. Journal of educational Psychology, 73(5), 642.   DOI
11 Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of applied psychology, 74(4), 580.   DOI
12 Kolb, J. A., "Leadership of creative teams." Journal of Creative Behavior, 26(1), pp. 1-9, 1992.   DOI
13 Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The leadership quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Harackiewicz, J. M. (1979). The effects of reward contingency and performance feedback on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8), 1352.   DOI
15 Kellerman, B. (2004). Bad leadership: What it is, how it happens, why it matters. Harvard Business Press.
16 Lawler, E. E., "High-involvement management: Participative strategies for improving organizational performance", Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1986.
17 Liden, R. C., & Graen, G. (1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management journal, 23(3), 451-465. Modway & Steers, 1982   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 705-750.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of management journal, 39(3), 607-634.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Wolmark, N., Rockette, H., Fisher, B., Wickerham, D. L., Redmond, C., Fisher, E. R., ... & Petrelli, N. J. (1993). The benefit of leucovorin-modulated fluorouracil as postoperative adjuvant therapy for primary colon cancer: results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocol C-03. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 11(10), 1879-1887.   DOI
21 Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). Research on employee creativity: A critical review and directions for future research. Research in personnel and human resources management, 22, 165-218.
22 Ryan, R. M., & Grolnick, W. S. (1986). Origins and pawns in the classroom: Self-report and projective assessments of individual differences in children's perceptions. Journal of personality and social psychology, 50(3), 550.   DOI
23 Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of management journal, 37(3), 580-607.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Shanock, L. R., & Eisenberger, R. (2006). When supervisors feel supported: relationships with subordinates' perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and performance. Journal of Applied psychology, 91(3), 689.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management journal, 44(4), 682-696.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Zhou, J. (1998a). Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: Interactive effects on creative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, pp 261-276.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Zuckerman, M., Porac, J., Lathin, D., Smith, R., & Deci, E. L. (1978). On the importance of self-determination for intrinsically motivated behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 443-446.   DOI