• Digital Contents
• /
• no.6 s.133
• /
• pp.128-135
• /
• 2004

IT의 눈부신 발전에 의해 세계에서 유례를 찾아보기 힘들 정도로 초고속인터넷은 이미 우리의 일상생활이 됐다. 이에 따라 디지털콘텐츠도 속속 개발돼 인터넷을 통해 수 없이 많은 제작물들이 유통되고 있다. 자본과 노력의 결실로 이뤄진 디지털콘텐츠가 폭발적으로 증가하면서 우리나라는 이것에 대한 정당한 가치를 보호하기 위해 저작권법, 컴퓨터프로그램보호법, 온라인디지털콘텐츠산업발전법 등의 관련법을 제 · 개정해 이에 적극적으로 대처하고 있다. 구체적으로 현행 제도의 운영과정에서 나타난 일부 미비점을 개선 · 보완하기 위해 2000년에 대폭 개정한 저작권법을 또 다시 2003년에 저작권법을 개정했다. 이것은 저작권법이 그 만큼 빠르게 변화하는 추세에 적응하기 위한 노력이라고 평가할 수 있다. 아울러 컴퓨터프로그램보호법과 온라인디지털콘텐츠산업발전법을 제정해 시행하고 있다. 여기에서는 디지털콘텐츠를 보호하는 저작권법, 컴퓨터프로그램보호법, 온라인디지털콘텐츠산업발전법의 주요내용을 살펴본다.

• International Area Studies Review
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.371-389
• /
• 2009

Recently the ordinances of the Conciliation Committee of Distribution Disputes have been enacted and revised throughout the country. The purposes of the ordinances are to establish and operate the Conciliation Committee of Distribution Dispute. But several problems have been found in the ordinances of the Conciliation Committee of Distribution Disputes. These are the appointment of the chairman of the Conciliation Committee of Distribution Disputes, appointment of the acting chairman of the committee, consolidation of the requests of conciliation, challenge of the committee member. Also, the conciliator must keep in mind the several consideration when the Conciliation Committee of Distribution Disputes render the conciliation. These are the mutual survival between large distributer and small and medium distributer, care of consumer in the region, the growth and development of regional economy.

• Journal of Regulation Studies
• /
• v.27 no.1
• /
• pp.123-151
• /
• 2018

There have been voluminous debates on the economic effects of the Sunday shopping restriction in Korea. This paper summarizes the issues on the restriction, critically reviews the previous researches, and proposes policy alternatives. First, the Sunday shopping restriction in Korea significantly lowers supply-side efficiency. Second, the restriction considerably reduces demand-side efficiency due to higher transaction costs. Third, there is no empirical evidence showing the restriction improves equity overall. Fourth, even if equity improvement occurs, there are a number of policy alternatives that can achieve the same equity effect with less efficiency loss.

• Journal of Distribution Science
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.37-47
• /
• 2011

Our distribution industry still lacks legal and institutional supplementary frameworks. Therefore, we urgently need systematic supporting schemes for targeting small merchants, including those in traditional markets. In 2004, the scope of and target for traditional markets took shape through the enactment of the 'Special Act for Nurturing the Traditional Markets'. Though restricted to a single market, it expanded the target and scope to include markets and stores, market improvement districts, and business improvement districts. However, the Special Act for Nurturing the Traditional Markets, the criterion for the revitalization of and support for the traditional market, applies a uniform standard. Accordingly, the Special Act for Nurturing the Traditional Markets has revealed problems, such as the deficit of legitimate ideas about unregistered markets. This study identifies the problems with the Special Act for Nurturing the Traditional Markets. We take the Moranjang case as an example. This study offers the problems new insight. We discuss the problems in terms of their empirical reality. We focus on unregistered markets, which are not protected by law. Most previous studies have applied empirical methods, but this study also provides legal and institutional perspectives on the prospect for efficient outcomes by applying the normative study methods applicable in the field.

• Journal of Distribution Science
• /
• v.11 no.10
• /
• pp.47-53
• /
• 2013

Purpose - Six months have passed since the amendment of the SSM regulation law; however, as yet, there is no confirmed research or report on the effects of this amendment, which are indefinite. Further, there have been no attempts to study the effects of the SSM regulation law from the consumers' viewpoint, which is important because consumers are the main agents that are greatly influenced by the amendment law. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the consumers' attitude toward the SSM regulation law as well as the effects of the SSM regulation law on the changes in purchase behavior. Research design, data, and methodology - This study was initiated from four research problems that are linked to consumer reaction to the SSM regulation law. Research problem 1: What is the consumers' reaction (perception, attitude, and perceived fairness) to the SSM regulation law? Research problem 2: How do the consumers' reactions to the SSM regulation law differ by consumers' characteristics? Research problem 3: Could the SSM regulation law change a consumer's purchase behavior? Research problem 4: Is it necessary to amend the SSM regulation law? This study collected the data through the interview and survey of housewives for the purpose of solving the research problems. The interview was conducted as a pilot study for the field survey. We interviewed three housewives, who were: an employed housewife, a full-time homemaker, and a manager of a housewife club, respectively. We then conducted a field survey of 232 housewives who were housewife club members or elementary school parents in Chunghcheong-do. Results - We verified the reliability and validity of the data, and analyzed it to solve the research problems. The main findings of this study were as follows. First, consumers still have a positive attitude toward large discount chains and SSM, which has been the case since the law was introduced. Second, perceived risk of consumers associated with traditional markets and small neighborhood shops was low. Third, consumers think that amendments of the SSM regulation law are important, and they positively assess the satisfaction, necessity, and propriety of the law. Fourth, although the SSM regulation law caused inconvenience to consumers, this law did not have any influence on the usage frequency and the use-behavior of large discount chains. Finally, consumers reacted very negatively to the toughening up of the SSM regulation law. Conclusions - In short, consumers still have a positive attitude toward the SSM regulation law. However, this act did not have any influence on the use-behavior of large discount chains (General Super Market). Thus, policy making authorities require active communication and promotions to enhance the effect of the SSM regulation law. This study was of the nature of exploratory research, which did not focus on hypothesis testing, but on finding solutions to the research problems. Therefore, this study is no more than a simple data analysis. Future studies should attempt to investigate the actual effects of the SSM regulation law, on the basis of sufficient literature review and real sales data.

• Journal of Distribution Science
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.83-95
• /
• 2011

Conventional markets in Korea have played a pivotal role in the vitalization of local communities and economies along with the distribution of products. Although many people believe the markets to be disorderly, they are lively and provide local people with things to enjoy, watch and buy. However, superstores have undergone a mushrooming proliferation since Korea opened its gates to multinational superstores in 1996. This phenomenon has caused a crisis for Korea's conventional markets. They have lost their competitiveness because of this environmental change, inefficient management, and their outmoded facilities. Government efforts to revitalize the markets have centered on redevelopment of the facilities, a perspective that has caused not only the fall of the old business districts but also the decline of the distribution function. Under these conditions, the traditional market has re-entered into competition. The Korean government enacted a special law to revitalize the conventional markets and has been implementing many policies to support them since 2003. In 2009, the government amended the law and adopted the Business Improvement District System. The government also changed the official term from 'old markets' to 'Conventional markets'. Despite this legal amendment, though, we still need to re-establish the concept of the Conventional market. Historically, markets grew up spontaneously to dispose of surplus products. Some manmade markets were established through urban planning or as public facilities. Their businesses transactions have always been based on mutual trust between consumers and trades people, the traditional way of commercial dealing. Conventional markets can be defined, then, as creatures of societal necessity where transactions for services and products are based on mutual trust. Problematically, unlisted markets are left out of government support. Although unlisted markets have performed almost the same functions as listed markets, they exist only as a statistic as far as the special law is concerned. In some areas, there are more unlisted markets than unlisted ones. Therefore, it is necessary to establish systematic management methods for the unlisted markets. Some unlisted markets received support in the form of facility improvement from local governments' budgets in the early stage of the special law's enforcement. The current government also assists with safety issues involving unlisted markets; however, the current special law provides no legal framework for unlisted markets. Moreover, consumers cannot tell the difference between unlisted markets and listed ones. Finding a solution to this problemrequires new standards and a wider scope of support by which the efficiency of the market improvement support system might be enhanced.