• 동위원소뉴스
• /
• no.2 s.62
• /
• pp.2-4
• /
• 2002

• 동위원소뉴스
• /
• no.9 s.57
• /
• pp.8-9
• /
• 2001

• Nuclear industry
• /
• v.37 no.2
• /
• pp.60-89
• /
• 2017

본지는 2016년 10월호(통권 365호) 특집을 통해 국회에 계류되어 있는 원자력 관련 법률 개정안 20건을 소개한 바 있다. 그 이후 2017년 2월 22일 현재 원자력 안전, 원자력 진흥, 원자력안전위원회, 방사성폐기물과 관련한 법률안 및 법률 개정안 16건이 발의되었다. 발의된 의안 중 국회 본회의에서 처리된 의안은 아직까지 한 건도 없으며, 몇몇 법안만 소관위 전체회의(임시회)에 상정되어 제안 설명, 검토 보고, 대체 토론 후 소위에 회부된 상태이다. 지난해 10월 20일 이후 제안된 의안들을 사안별로 나누어 제안 이유와 주요 내용, 의안 전문을 게재하며 사계의 진단을 기대한다.

• Nuclear industry
• /
• v.15 no.12 s.154
• /
• pp.5-14
• /
• 1995

정부는 제4차 선도기술개발협의회에서 한국표준형 원전의 후속모델인 차세대원전 기술개발 2단계사업을 G7사업으로 계속 추진키로 최종 확정하였다. 94년까지의 1단계 연구사업에 대하여 주관부처인 통상산업부의 자체평가와 원자력이용개발전문위원, 원자력안전전문위원회 및 과학기술처 G7 종합평가기획단의 심의를 거쳐 차세대원전 기술개발 2단계사업을 G7사업으로 계속 추진키로 확정한 것이다. 현재 2단계사업인 기본설계를 개발중인 우리나라의 차세대원전 기술개발사업의 추진현황과 향후 추진방향을 알아본다.

• Nuclear industry
• /
• v.37 no.12
• /
• pp.5-19
• /
• 2017

산업통상자원부는 '17년부터 '31년까지 향후 15년간의 전력수급 전망 및 전력설비 계획 등을 담은 '제8차 전력수급기본계획'(안)을 마련하여 12월 14일 국회 산업통상자원중소벤처기업위원회(이하 산업위)의 통상 에너지 소위에 보고했다. 이번 계획(안)은 지난해 12월 계획 수립에 착수한 이래 약 1년간 70여명 전문가들의 43차례 회의를 거쳐 작성되었으며, 그간 수요 전망, 설비 계획, 예비율 등 5차례에 걸쳐 중간 결과를 공개하여 시민 환경단체, 에너지업계 등 이해 관계자로부터 의견을 수렴해 왔으며, 지난 9월에는 국회 산업위 통상에너지소위에 중간 보고를 하였다. 기존 수급계획이 수급 안정과 경제성 위주로 수립되었던 것에 반해, 이번 8차 계획은 최근 전기사업법 개정(전기사업법 제3조 개정('17.3월) : "전력수급기본계획 수립시, 전기설비의 경제성, 환경 및 국민안전에 미치는 영향 등을 종합적으로 고려하여야") 취지를 감안하여 환경성 안전성을 대폭 보강하여 수립한 것이 특징이다. 또한 발전소 건설을 우선 추진하기보다는 수요 관리를 통한 합리적 목표 수요 설정에 주안점을 두었고, 신규 발전설비는 대규모 원전 석탄 일변도에서 벗어나 친환경 분산형 재생에너지와 LNG 발전을 우선시하였다. 이번 수급계획은 국회 산업위 통상에너지소위 보고 외에도 국회 산업위 전체회의 보고, 공청회 등을 통해 추가적으로 의견을 수렴한 뒤 전력정책심의회 심의를 거쳐 최종 확정될 예정이다. 국회에 보고된 제8차 전력수급기본계획(안) 전문을 게재한다.

• Progress in Medical Physics
• /
• v.26 no.4
• /
• pp.294-303
• /
• 2015

American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Published Task Group 40 report which includes recommendations for comprehensive quality assurance (QA) for medical linear accelerator in 1994 and TG-142 report for recommendation for QA which includes procedures such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in 2010. Recently, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission (NSSC) published NSSC notification no. 2015-005 which is "Technological standards for radiation safety of medical field". This notification regulate to establish guidelines for quality assurance which includes organization and job, devices, methods/frequency/tolerances and action levels for QA, and to implement quality assurance in each medical institution. For this reason, all of these facilities using medical machine for patient treatment should establish items, frequencies and tolerances for proper QA for medical treatment machine that use the techniques such as non-IMRT, IMRT and SRS/SBRT, and perform quality assurance. For domestic, however, there are lack of guidelines and reports of Korean Society of Medical Physicists (KSMP) for reference to establish systematic QA report in medical institutes. This report, therefore, suggested comprehensive quality assurance system such as the scheme of quality assurance system, which is considered for domestic conditions, based the notification of NSSC and AAPM TG-142 reports. We think that the quality assurance system suggested for medical linear accelerator also help establishing QA system for another high-precision radiation treatment machines.

• Journal of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology(JNFCWT)
• /
• v.6 no.4
• /
• pp.357-368
• /
• 2008

On July 31, 2008, the Government issued the construction and operation permit for the first low and intermediate level radioactive waste disposal facility in the Republic of Korea. In this paper, the fundamental regulatory framework, regulatory requirements and technical standards of the disposal facility are introduced, and the phased review process adopted for evaluation of the safety of the facility is briefly described. The Atomic Energy Act sets forth a stepwise regulatory framework for the whole life-cycle of the disposal facility such as siting, design, construction, operation, closure and institutional control. More detailed regulatory requirements and technical standards are stipulated in the subsequent regulations of the Atomic Energy Act and a series of Notices issued by the Ministry of Eduction, Science and Technology. The Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, as entrusted by the Ministry under the Atomic Energy Act, conducted safety review on the disposal facility, and evaluated the compliance with relevant criteria in all technical elements(i.e. siting and structural safety, radiological environmental impact, operational safety, systems and components, quality assurance, and total systematic performance assessment, etc.). The overall safety review process can be phased into inception phase, initial review phase, main review phase and completion phase. The review results were reported to and deliberated by the five Sub-committees of the Special Committee on Nuclear Safety, and then reported to the Ministry. The Ministry issued the construction and operation permit of the disposal facility through the deliberation of the review results by the Nuclear Safety Commission. Hereafter, the safety of the repository will be reassured by a series of subsequent regulatory inspections and reviews under the Atomic Energy Act. In addition, the licensee's continuous implementation of the "Safety Promotion Plan" may also enhance the long-term safety of the repository and contribute to build-up the confidence of the safety case.

• Journal of Environmental Policy
• /
• v.7 no.4
• /
• pp.105-134
• /
• 2008

Local opposition and protest constitute single greatest hurdle to the siting of locally unwanted land uses(LULUs), especially siting of high-level radioactive disposal not only throughout Korea but also throughout the industrialized world. It can be attributed mainly to the NIMBYism, equity problem, and lack of participation. These problems are arisen from rational planning process which emphasizes instrumental rationality. But planning is a value-laden political activity, in which substantive rationality is central. To achieve this goals, we need a sound planning process for siting LULUs, which should improve the ability of citizens to influence the decisions that affects them. By a sound planning process, we mean one that is open to citizen input and contains accurate and complete information. In other word, the public is also part of the goal setting process and, as the information and analyses developed by the planners are evaluated by the public, strategies for solutions can be developed through consensus-building. This method is called as a co-operative siting process, and must be structured in order to arrive at publicly acceptable decisions. The followings are decided by consensus-building method. 1. Negotiation will be held? 2. What is the benefits and risks of negotiation? 3. What are solutions when collisions between national interests and local ones come into? 4. What are the agendas? 5. What is the community' role in site selection? 6. Are there incentives to negotiation. 7. Who are the parties to the negotiation? 8. Who will represent the community? 9. What groundwork of negotiation is set up? 10. How do we assure that the community access to information and expert? 11. What happens if negotiation is failed? 12. Is it necessary to trust each other in negotiations? 13. Is a mediator needed in negotiations?

• Korean Security Journal
• /
• no.59
• /
• pp.217-242
• /
• 2019

Nowadays, Terrorism has become bloodier. Unlike the past, the recent terrorism has been indiscriminate in the purpose of mass- killing. Given this aspect, the threat of a CBRN attack is the biggest one to modern society. Notably, the possibility of terrorist attacks in Korea by international terrorist groups such as ISIL is higher than ever in consideration of its allusion; crusades and the devil's allied forces. To overcome these circumstances, various measures have been taken for counter terrorism at the state level including anti-terrorist legislation. Under the anti-terrorist act, police have to lead relevant inter agencies when it comes to the CBRN terror. At first glance, current countermeasures would work well. However, in order to respond quickly, the standing cooperations system of related departments need to be set up. In this sense, this article proposed a coagulatory body that could not only consider institutional-oriented organizational restructuring and response but also integrate and operate functions of various specialized institutions. It also stressed that the council should move toward a consultative body of information gathering, distribution and working- level consultation. With this cooperation system, counter-terrorism agencies can respond rapidly, stop wasting their effort and assets by about 30%. Also, they could design the atypical aspect of terrorism into standardized.

• Korean Security Journal
• /
• no.41
• /
• pp.37-66
• /
• 2014

In recent years, with the development of computers and electronics, electronics and communication technology in a growing and each part is dependent on the cross-referencing makes all electronic equipment is obsolete due to direct or indirect damage EMP. Korea and the impending standoff North Korea has a considerable level of technologies related to the EMP, EMP weapons you already have or in a few years, the development of EMP weapons will complete. North Korea launched a long-range missile and conducted a nuclear test on several occasions immediately after, when I saw the high-altitude nuclear blackmail has been strengthening the outright offensive nuclear EMP attacks at any time and practical significance for the EMP will need offensive skills would improve. At this point you can predict the damage situation of Korea's security reality that satisfy the need, more than anything else to build a protective system of the EMP. The scale of the damage that unforeseen but significant military damage and socio-economic damage and fatalities when I looked into the situation which started out as a satellite communications systems and equipment to attack military and security systems and transportation, finance, national emergency system, such as the damage elsewhere. In General, there is no direct casualties reported, but EMP medical devices that rely on lethal damage to people who can show up. In addition, the State power system failure due to a power supply interruption would not have thought the damage would bring State highly dependent on domestic power generation of nuclear plants is a serious nuclear power plant accident in the event of a blackout phenomenon can lead to the plant's internal problems should see a forecast. First of all, a special expert Committee of the EMP, the demand for protective facilities and equipment and conduct an investigation, he takes fits into your budget is under strict criteria by configuring the contractors should be sifting through. He then created the Agency for verification of performance EMP protection after you have verified the performance of maintenance, maintenance, safety and security management, design and construction company organized and systematic process Guard facilities or secret communications equipment and perfect for the EMP, such as protective equipment maneuver system should take.