• Title/Summary/Keyword: 우선변제권

Search Result 4, Processing Time 0.023 seconds

Consolidation of Protection for Lessees by Improvement of Opposing Power System of the Unregistered Housing Leases (미등기 주택임대차의 대항력 관련 제도개선을 통한 임차인보호 강화)

  • No, Hann-Jang
    • The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
    • /
    • v.14 no.8
    • /
    • pp.466-475
    • /
    • 2014
  • According to the Housing Lease Protection Act, even though it is not registered, if the lessee has completed delivery of a house and the resident registration, the lease shall take effect against the third person from the following day thereof. Any lessee who has met the requirements for opposing power and obtained the fixed date on the lease contract document, shall be entitled to receive the repayment of the deposit from the converted price of the leased house, in preference to any junior obligors and other creditors, at the time of an auction as provided by the Civil Execution Act and a public sale as prescribed by the National Tax Collection Act. The lessee shall be entitled to receive a repayment of a specified amount of the deposit in preference to other persons having the security rights in the leased house. However those provisions give rise to many problems because the Housing Lease Protection Act allows the opposing power and the right of preferential payment from the following date of fulfillment of the requirement. For the purpose of solving the problems, this study suggests that the Housing Lease Protection Act need to be amended as follows. The fixed date should be added to the requirement of opposing power and the preferential right of specified deposit repayment. In addition, the commencement of opposing power and preferential right of deposit repayment need to be taken effect from the day that the requirement is fulfilled.

The Improvements of Preferred Right on the Housing Lease Protection Act (주택임대차보호법상 최우선변제권에 대한 개선방안)

  • Park, Jong-Ryeol;Joung, Soon-Hyoung
    • Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
    • /
    • v.17 no.8
    • /
    • pp.135-144
    • /
    • 2012
  • The Preferred Right that recognized in Housing Lease Protection Act Article 8 Paragraph 1 is a legal security right. The case of a small tenant whose security deposit is less than a specific sum of money to lease housing, he can get preferential payment about his a specific sum of money of security deposit in an auction procedure. Like this the Preferred Right can protect the homeless commoner also it ignores the existing legal system. But the Preferred Right has the right function that contribute to stability of homeless people's housing, on the other hand, it has the adverse function that damages to several interested parties in an auction procedure by using legal preferential protection. So, about these problems, the improvement way will propose in this study.

A Legislative Study on the Plans for its Improvements and Problems of the Lien in the Real Estate Auction (부동산경매에서 유치권의 문제점과 개선방안에 대한 입법론적 검토)

  • Jun, Jang-Hean
    • Journal of Legislation Research
    • /
    • no.41
    • /
    • pp.261-302
    • /
    • 2011
  • A lien is the right to possession the thing until receiving repayment of its bonds in some cases that the property of other person or the occupant for marketable securities receive the bond that has occurred on that property or marketable securities. This has own purpose to break 'principle of creditor equality' to protect especially the bond of the subject occupant in terms of justice. These lien on our civil law come according to the law in prepared certain requirements. However, an incomplete real rights granted by way of security that does not have a preferential performance right or seniority on the exchange value of the object suffer from the problems a lot in the real estate auction process because of the feature that is not announced in the register unlike the mortgage. In addition, the lien of real estate is not lapsed in an auction process. There is no preferential performance righ in a positive law as providing that can oppose to the buyer(a successful bidder) until received repayment the secured bond price to be compliant with the lien(Civil Case Execution Law the 91st clause of Article 5). However, as asserted the super preferential performance righ to a buyer in real terms, acts as primary cause of breaking unexpected loss and according unfair law relation to a senior mortgagee and seizor, etc. and the principles of the creditors equality to the persons concerned in other words, the principles of justice. All of these issues are the establishment of the lien and theory conflict on the effects. In spite of the fluctuations of a real right about real estate is announced as a registration by the current law, only the lien come into unclear announcement means for possession. In addition, Civil Case Execution Law argument is caused by the adoption abernahmeprinzip about the lien (Civil Case Execution Law the 91st clause of Article 5). Therefore, this paper was examined briefly the significance and purpose, history and law-making examples of each country and the valid requirements and effect of the lien that is basic principle of law about the lien system above all. And then, it will be reviewed the improvement plan for de lege ferenda to improve the issues about this after reviewing the objection, theory and judicial precedent about opposing power and preferential performance right of the lien in the real estaKey Words : Lien, Oppose Power, Mortgage right, Preferential Performance right, Seizure, Real Estate Auction, Lien who can not Opposing against Successful Bidder, Lien who can Oppose against Successful Bidder, Possessionte auction that is a fundamental problem on requirement and effect of the lien.

Improvements for the Problem of Housing Lease Protection Act Article 3-3 (주택임대차보호법 제3조의3 문제점에 대한 개선방안)

  • Park, Jong-Ryeol
    • The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
    • /
    • v.12 no.8
    • /
    • pp.198-206
    • /
    • 2012
  • The Lease Registration Instruction system that newly established in 4th opening a court of the Housing Lease Protection Act has regulated the following. After the lease expires, if finish the lease registering on the rental house to leaseholder who did not return the deposit. Previous opposing power and Priority Repayment Right are preserved intact. And after the leasehold registration, even if loss the claiming requisite of Housing Lease Protection Act's Article 3 Paragraph 1, already acquired opposing power and the Priority Repayment Right will not be lost. Thus, the tenants free to transfer its residences without anxiety. So it is focused on protecting tenant's rights who social and economic weak person. But in reality, did not return the expensive lease deposit. So, most tenants cannot transfer freely their residences. Or even if migration as completing the lease registration unavoidably by Lease Registration Instruction, they cannot receive their lease deposit as soon as possible, like this there are many problems. So, propose the improvement plan by this study.