• Title/Summary/Keyword: 역외적용

Search Result 31, Processing Time 0.024 seconds

The Definition of Connecting Flight and Extraterritorial Application of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004: A Case Comment on Claudia Wegener v. Royal Air Maroc SA [2018] Case C-537/17 (EC 261/2004 규칙의 역외적용과 연결운항의 의미 - 2018년 EU사법재판소 Claudia Wegener v. Royal Air Maroc SA 판결의 평석 -)

  • Sur, Ji-Min
    • The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
    • /
    • v.35 no.1
    • /
    • pp.103-125
    • /
    • 2020

  • This paper reviews the EU Case, Claudia Wegener v. Royal Air Maroc SA [2018] ECLI:EU:C:2018:361, Case C-537/17. It analyzes some issues as to Wegener case by examining EU Regulations and practical point of views. Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, entitled scope, provides: "this Regulation shall apply: (a) to passengers departing from an airport located in the territory of a Member State to which the Treaty applies; (b) to passengers departing from an airport located in a third country to an airport situated in the territory of a Member State to which the Treaty applies, unless they received benefits or compensation and were given assistance in that third country, if the operating air carrier of the flight concerned is a Community carrier." ECJ held that must be interpreted as meaning that Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 applies to a passenger transport effected under a single booking and comprising, between its departure from an airport situated in the territory of a Member State and its arrival at an airport situated in the territory of a third State, a scheduled stopover outside the European Union with a change of aircraft. According to the Court, it is apparent from the regulation and case-law that when, as in the present case, two (or more) flights are booked as a single unit, those flights constitute a whole for the purposes of the right to compensation for passengers. Those flights must therefore be considered as one and the same connecting flight.

  • https://doi.org/10.31691/KASL35.1.4. 인용 PDF KSCI

국제통상법과 경쟁법 - 역외적용 및 경쟁법의 수렴 -

  • 김두진
    • Journal of Korea Fair Competition Federation
    • /
    • no.119
    • /
    • pp.2-11
    • /
    • 2005

  • 국제경쟁사건을 해결하기 위하여 동원 가능한 일차적 수단은 법정지법인 경쟁법을 역외적용 하는 방안이지만 이 경우 국가간 마찰이나 외국 주권에 대한 침해논쟁이 유발될 수 있고, 관련 외국정부의 협력을 얻을 것도 필요하다. 국제경쟁사건을 해결하기 위한 근본적 수단으로는 각국 경쟁법을 조화시키거나 수렴하는 방안이 있다. 이는 우수한 규범형성에 관한 컨센서스 형성과 개별 법영역이 공통의 규범을 국내법으로 수용하는 절차라는 요소들로 구성된다. 후자는 연성수렴, 경성수렴 등 여러 방식으로 행해질 수 있다.

  • PDF