• The Journal of Korean Philosophical History
• /
• no.36
• /
• pp.75-99
• /
• 2013

In this treatise, the writer aimed to discuss the points that the Zhouyi("周易") which Dasan(茶山) studied is connected with Xiangshuyixue(象數易學). First of all, Dasan(茶山) reconstructed Shiyi("十翼"). The unique thing is that he included such a new topic, called Shiguachuan("蓍卦傳") - manual of divination signs manual in the Shiyi("十翼"). This Shiguachuan("蓍卦傳") is concerned with the method of divination, and is deeply related to the Xiangshuyixue(象數易學). When it comes to the Zhouyi("周易") which Dasan(茶山) studied, Yilisifa(易理四法). As he discussed Xiang(象), it is connected to the Xiangshuyixue(象數易學). Also, there is a link between the Yilisifa(易理四法) and the Shiguachuan("蓍卦傳"). Dasan(茶山) argued that the Yilisifa(易理四法) is a must in interpreting Zhouyi("周易"). Thus, it can be said that the Zhouyi("周易") which Dasan(茶山) studied is connected with the Xiangshuyixue(象數易學). Next, the writer examined Duyiyaozhi("讀易要旨"), Yilun(易論) and Chunqiu guanzhanbuzhu("春秋官占補註")- literally, annotated collection of divination practice by compiler or editor of annals, etc. Duyiyaozhi("讀易要旨") is related to the Xiangshuyixue(象數易學), too. The writer was able to find out the fact that, in relation to the Divination Signs Manual, the Chunqiuguanzhanbuzhu("春秋官占補註") was also connected with the Xiangshuyixue(象數易學). Through these studies, the writer was able to see that how much Dasan(茶山) had exerted his efforts to define and describe Xiang(象) and Shu(數).

• The Journal of Korean Philosophical History
• /
• no.53
• /
• pp.35-61
• /
• 2017

The formation process of Dasan(茶山)'s Yi Xue(易學) in Xinghuxuepai(星湖學派) was examined. Dasan(茶山)'s Yi Xue(易學) succeeded to the methods of Huti (互體) and Yaobian(爻變) from Seong-ho(星湖) and Ha-bin(河濱), and Dasan(茶山) thought that he couldn't cover Zhouyi("周易") just with this one method. So he suggested the four methods called Yilisifa(易理四法), and supplemented it with 18 methods through Duyiyaozhi(?讀易要旨?). Accordingly, the process of how Dasan(茶山)'s Yi Xue(易學) was established was examined one by one. Dasan(茶山) succeeded to the method of Huti(互體) from Seong-ho Lee Ik(星湖李瀷), the leading master of Xinghuxuepai(星湖學派). Nevertheless, Dasan(茶山) argued that the method of Huti(互體) had been from Zhu Xi(朱子). However, this argument of Dasan(茶山)'s seems to have resulted from Zhengzu(正祖)'s academic research policy. As a way to interpret Zhouyi(?周易?), Dasan(茶山) succeeded to the method of Yaobian(爻變) from Ha-bin(河濱). However, Dasan(茶山) argued that Yaobian(爻變)was Zhu Xi(朱子)'s intention. He had no choice but this because of Zhengzu(正祖)'s academic research policy. Dasan(茶山) succeeded to the method of Huti(互體) from Seong-ho(星湖) and Yaobian(爻變) from Ha-bin(河濱), but Dasan(茶山) proposed the four key methods called Yilisifa(易理四法). Many researchers have argued that, as for Dasan(茶山)'s modern viewpoint, Dasan(茶山) developed Yi Xue(易學) in a similar way as Xihe Mauqiling(西河 毛奇齡). However, this viewpoint cannot be judged to have been similar as it was expressed when Dasan(茶山) himself criticized Xihe(西河)'s Jingxueguan(經學觀).