• Title/Summary/Keyword: 양.음각성형

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

Effective Process Parameters on Surface Roughness in Incremental Sheet Metal Forming (점진성형에서 표면거칠기에 영향을 미치는 공정 변수)

  • Lee, Sang-Yoon;Lee, Kyeong-Bu;Kang, Jae-Gwan
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Manufacturing Process Engineers
    • /
    • v.13 no.6
    • /
    • pp.66-72
    • /
    • 2014
  • Incremental forming is a relatively novel sheet forming process, in which parts can be formed without the use of dedicated dies. In this paper, the influence of the process parameters (tool diameter, step size, feed rate, existence of a die, forming methods, and kinds of tool path) on surface roughness in the case in which parts are processed by incremental forming was discussed. Al 1050 material is used in the experiments. A table of orthogonal arrays is used to design the experiments and the ANOVA method is employed to statistically analyze the results. The obtained results show that the process parameters of tool diameter, step size, and the existence of a die have a significant effect on the surface roughness, whereas the feed rate, forming methods and kinds of tool path are insignificant.

Forming Accuracy Comparison Between Positive and Negative Incremental Forming Al 1050 (AL1050 소재의 양·음각 점진성형 공법간 성형 정밀도 비교)

  • Lee, Kyeong-Bu;Oh, Hyun-Man;Kang, Jae-Gwan
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Manufacturing Technology Engineers
    • /
    • v.22 no.5
    • /
    • pp.800-805
    • /
    • 2013
  • Incremental forming of sheet metal is a modern method of forming sheet metal, where parts can be formed without the use of dedicated dies. Existing experimental configurations for incremental forming can be broadly classified into two categories, i.e., negative and positive forming. In this paper, forming qualities such as shape accuracy and surface roughness of Al 1050 material were discussed for different forming methods. The formed and the corresponding opposing surfaces were measured with a three-dimensional scanner and a surface roughness tester. It was found that in terms of shape accuracy, the best opposing surface was obtained with positive forming, whereas the worst formed surface was obtained with negative forming; furthermore, the opposing surface is always better than the formed surface, regardless of the forming method used.