• 기록학연구
• /
• 제55호
• /
• pp.73-96
• /
• 2018

본 논문은 앤디 워홀(Andy Warhol, 1928-1987)의 작품 시리즈를 통해 예술가의 개인기록 집적이 갖는 기록학적 특성과 가치에 관한 연구이다. 앤디 워홀의 은 개인의 일상기록인 동시에 예술작품으로도 평가할 수 있어 연구할 가치가 높다. 앤디 워홀은 1974년부터 사망할 때까지 자신이 생산하거나 수집한 물건 대부분을 상자에 넣어 보관하였다. 워홀은 개인적인 기록부터 물건 구매 영수증, 초대장, 메모, 편지, 목소리가 녹음된 테이프, 신문, 잡지, 팬레터, 우편물, 전시 도록 등을 상자에 넣었고, 시간이 지나면 테이프로 봉인한 뒤 날짜를 표기하는 행위를 반복하였다. 앤디 워홀의 수집 행위는 작가의 삶을 관통해 반복적으로 지속되었다. 때로는 기록 생산자로서 자신이 만났던 사람들이나 구입한 책의 목록, 관람한 영화 등 일상에서 무수히 반복되는 행위를 끊임없이 기록하였고, 때로는 아키비스트의 자세로 타인의 기록을 수집하고 정리하는 모습을 보였다. 이처럼 앤디 워홀은 다른 사람에게는 가치가 없는 행위와 정보도 특별히 여겨 자신은 물론 주변을 기록하는 데 집착하고 애정을 드러 내었다. 앤디 워홀이 의도적으로 생산하거나 수집한 기록은 작가 개인뿐 아니라 주변인, 나아가 사회 전반을 파악하는 정보를 지니기에 매우 중요한 정보적, 증거적 가치를 갖고 있으며, 동시에 작품으로 승화되었다. 이처럼 여러 가치를 지닌 기록물은 다층적인 관계를 이해하고 연구할 수 있는 자료가 된다. 또 기록의 행위와 결과가 기록이라는 결과물로만 존재하는 것이 아니라, 예술적 가치를 인정받아 작품으로도 평가받을 수 있다는 점을 잘 보여주는 사례라고 할 수 있다.

• 주택과사람들
• /
• 통권199호
• /
• pp.22-22
• /
• 2006

피카소 이후 대중에게 가장 사랑 받아온 현대 미술가 앤디 워홀(Andy Warhol). 액자를 에워싼 엄숙주의를 조롱하며 경쾌한 팝 아트를 선사했던 그가 돌아왔다. 인사동 쌈지길에서 2007년 1월 25일까지 펼쳐지는 전은 1987년 세상을 떠난 워홀과 21세기의 새로운 워홀을 위한 무지갯빛 헌사다.

• 프린팅코리아
• /
• 통권59호
• /
• pp.128-130
• /
• 2007

• 복식
• /
• 제50권
• /
• pp.183-196
• /
• 2000

Andy Warhol is one of the great artists in the modern history of art who compares favorably with Picasso. His activities had his object on pervasion of a pop art and profit of the art industry. Many previous studies on his activities have attracted and held the attention of his works of art after 1960s. However in spite of his working as publisher of a fashion magazine fashion illustrator fashion model displayer and etc. in 1950s. there are few studies on his activities of 1950s. Hence this study investigates his works of art in 1950s. and intensively analyzes his effect on modern fashion. In 1950s, Andy Warhol had already been distinguished in works of art from other commercial designers through the illustration for advertising design window display of stores and usage of Hollywood stars as anessential element in his works for whom he had sighed when he was young His works were also characterized by a rejection of they originality of commercial arts. He had an great effect on youth's fashion in 1950s and has activities in 1950s had influence on the diffusion of the public punk fashion in 1970s and the street fashion in 1980s.

• 미술이론과 현장
• /
• 제13호
• /
• pp.133-156
• /
• 2012

This paper briefly charts the history of excrement as part of the late 20th-century art and explores ways in which excrement functions in the realms of 'High' art. From Piero Manzoni's to David Hammons' performance , excrement has taken a small yet distinctively important part in the development of contemporary art. In an attempt to challenge the hegemony of 'high' art, on the one hand, and resist the commercialization and fetishization of art, on the other, Manzoni allegedly offered his own "shit" preserved in a tin can and sold it at the price of gold of the same weight. Andy Warhol took the legendary Abstract-Expressionist painter Jackson Pollock as the object of parody, simulating Pollock's dripping action by pissing onto the canvas that had been primed with copper-based paint. Warhol's urination produced splashes and stains of iridescent colors just as the patterns on ordinary abstract paintings. In contrast to Pollock's masculine action, Warhol's pissing alludes to the artist's homosexuality. Excrements in art also provoked controversies, debates, and even acts of vandalism against the artworks. The works of Andres Serrano and Chris Ofili infuriated many Christians for the blasphemous use of excrement with religious icons. Politicians engaged in the heated debates on the use of public and national funds in support of some of the 'politically incorrect' contemporary art. In the midst of media sensation and criticisms, these works challenged the conventional understanding of artistic beauty. The preexisting artworks were also targeted. African-american artist Hammons assumed the role of spectator in by urinating on Richard Serra's sculpture in the street of New York City. It was an act condemnation levelled at the racist pattern of the way in which large portions of funds and commisions of "public" art tended to promote established 'white' artists, whose work or creative process often failed to reflect the actual public. The use of excrement in art is not unusual in contemporary art practices. With its subversive power, excrement plays an important critical roles in the shaping of contemporary art.