• 해운
• /
• no.10 s.9
• /
• pp.29-31
• /
• 2004

우리나라는 지난 1961년 12월6일 해난심판법이 공포된데 이어 1963년 1월21일 해난심판위원회가 설립되었으며, 1999년 8월6일 현재의 해양안전심판원으로 개칭됐습니다. 해양안전심판원은 그동안 해양사고에 대한 전문적인 조사 및 심판을 통해 사고 원인을 규명하는 등 해양안전 확보에 크게 기여하였습니다. 특히, 우리나라의 경우 지방심판원 재결은 지방법원의 판결에 갈음하고, 중앙심 판원 재결은 고등법원의 판결에 갈음하는 성질을 가지게 하면서 중앙심판원의 재결에 대한 불복이 있을 경우에는 대법원에 소를 제기하는 3심제적 제도를 갖추고 있습니다. 이번 호부터 중앙해양안전심판원의 주요심판사례를 연재합니다. 여러분들의 업무에 도움이 되었으면 합니다.(편집자 주)

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2013.06a
• /
• pp.288-290
• /
• 2013

해양안전심판제도는 해양사고의 원인을 밝혀 해양안전에 이바지함을 목적으로 하고 있음에도, 실질적으로 원인조사보다는 징계를 주목적으로 하는 것처럼 보일 수 있다. 해양사고가 발생하였을 경우, 지방해양안전심판원은 원인재결 및 징계재결을 하는데, 해기사나 도선사에게 징계재결을 하면 이는 침익적인 행정처분에 해당된다. 이러한 행정처분에 다툼이 있을 경우 중앙해양안전심판원에 구제를 요청하면 행정심판이 된다. 행정심판의 재결에 대하여 다시 대법원에서 다투는 것이 행정소송이 된다. 일반적으로, 행정심판의 재결은 3심제의 재판을 받을 수 있으나, 해양안전심판제도에서 중앙해양안전심판원의 재결에 대한 행정소송은 대법원 전속관할 단심제로 운영되고 있어 헌법의 기본권 중의 하나인 재판청구권에 대한 위헌 논란이 계속되고 있으므로, 이 논문에서는 해양안전심판제도의 본래의 목적인 해양사고 원인규명을 통한 해상안전의 확보 및 징계재결로 인한 침해된 국민의 권리를 구제하기 위한 개선방안을 제안하고자 한다.

• Journal of Navigation and Port Research
• /
• v.34 no.8
• /
• pp.669-677
• /
• 2010

About ten years have passed since the rules regarding establishing the Inquiry Counsels Association in the Act on the Investigation of and Inquiry into Marine Accidents were founded in 1999. In recent years, we expect to do the inquiry aid of a person involved in a marine accident, when the government enacted new regimes to better protect the rights of social minorities. But despite such rules regarding establishing the Inquiry Counsels Association, the government did nothing to found the Association for the last ten years. Especially, it is necessary a pivotal figure connecting to a similar work boundary, because persons qualified for an inquiry counsel are various. The authors think that the establishment of the Inquiry Counsels Association plays key part in resolving these problems. Therefore this study focused on the establishment of the Inquiry Counsels Association.

• The Science & Technology
• /
• v.29 no.12 s.331
• /
• pp.87-89
• /
• 1996

WTO시대를 맞아 우리나라도 독ㆍ미ㆍ영ㆍ스웨덴에 이어 세계 다섯번째로 특허법원을 설치하게 되었다. 98년부터는 특허청 심판소의 심결에 대한 불복은 특허법원을 거쳐 대법원으로 상고하게 되면 심판소와 항고심판소로 나누어져 있는 특허청의 심판기능도 '특허심판원'이라는 하나의 기구로 통합하게 된다. 앞으로 지적재산권 보호를 위해 사법부는 물론 행정 입법부까지 앞장서서 범국가적인 대책을 마련해야 하겠다.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.15 no.11
• /
• pp.497-511
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study was to explore players' perception and emotional reaction toward referee's judgment. The participants of this study were six players (three male and three female) in 2016 national team. The results of this study are as follows: First, the differences in referee judgement were dependant on referees' subjective view point, rapid judging capability, qualification and experience. Second, we found that the a referee's judgement less affected match's results. The countermeasures against the adverse referee judgment include excitement, appeal, flow interruption, thought conversion, and concentration. Third, there were many opinions that both the degree of influence of the referee's judgement and the countermeasures was such that athletes were "not affected". In conclusion, the major determinant of players' performance were game strategy and accuracy of skill although the referee's judgement affected player's emotional reaction both in positive and negative ways.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.15 no.12
• /
• pp.7110-7117
• /
• 2014

This study examined 149 referees participating in the field of Judo judgment in 2013. 98 referees of the 1st level (65.8%), 18 referees of the 2nd level (12.1%) and 33 international referees (22.1%) were used as the final valid sample. To evaluate the basic background of referees, 7 categories, such as gender, age, Judo, and a referee career, a coaching career, the level of referee, and occupation were examined. In addition, 25 questions in 6 categories, such as misjudgment 4 questions, special consideration 4 questions, claims for judgment 9 questions, physical fitness burden 3 questions, disloyalty at home 3 questions, a lack of conditions 2 questions were tested for the stress of a judo referee. 20 questions in 4 categories, such as peer satisfaction 5 questions, salary satisfaction 5 questions, atmosphere satisfaction 6 questions, and working satisfaction 4 questions, were examined for job satisfaction as a referee in the field of Judo judgment. In particular, the effects of the factors causing stress for a referee and efforts to release the stress are explored. Based on the methods and data mentioned above, the results of this analysis were determined.

• Journal of Korea Entertainment Industry Association
• /
• v.15 no.6
• /
• pp.93-103
• /
• 2021

The purpose of this study is to explore changes in future sports by introducing baseball robot umpire. The study was conducted using qualitative research methods, and participants selected five baseball fans who were interested in baseball. The results of the study are as follows. First, baseball fans expressed displeasure with the frequent misjudgment in Korean Professional Baseball game, and doubted the fairness of the umpire's judgment. And repeated misjudgment of professional baseball has contributed to the decline in viewing and viewing of baseball. Second, baseball fans were positive about the introduction of robot umpire as a way to reduce bad calls in baseball games, and considered the accuracy, consistency, and recordability of robot umpire to complement their limitations. Third, the application of baseball robot umpire will serve as a basis for strengthening the fairness and efficiency of baseball games, which will positively change the image of sports. As a result, the introduction of robot umpire in baseball games could exert desirable influence on people and contribute to restoring the ethics of sports and strengthening fairness.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.16 no.3
• /
• pp.487-495
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study is to diagnose problems of the permanent judge system by examining the cases of practical running of the permanent judge system, and to provide basic materials for the settlement of fair and transparent judge culture. The findings of the case studies are as follows. First, the difficulties in selection, allocation, and education of judges caused by the operation of the permanent judge system. The problems in allocation are forceful allocation, conflict over allocation with general judges. The problems in evaluation are individual evaluation and limits of fairness, lack of evaluation rules. Second, the unpredictability of whether the permanent judge system survive or not. Third, there are some environmental constraints of the permanent judge system. Lack of protective apparatus is lack of rescue method and solution for intentional protest. Forth, there is a problem of low recognition of the permanent judge system. As the federation has been not active in publicizing the permanent judge system, the system is not well known.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety
• /
• v.11 no.1 s.22
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2005

The Judgement on a certain maritime accident accompany with punishment or recommendation to the examinee who was connected with that accident. It also gives quite a consequence to the Civil Trial relating with the maritime accident. In the Maritime Safety Tribunal System, the examinees can get assistance from Maritime Counselor. As it requires a lot of costs, it should be limited by economic condition of the examinees. In this Paper, with the consideration of the several kinds of Free Counsel System, Free Counsel System for Maritime Safety Tribunal was studied. The proposals are as follows; 1. To introduce the Mandatory Counselling and Court-designated Counselor System. The costs to be paid by government. 2. The same as above but the counselor to be designated among the staffs of the maritime organizations, then the costs to be paid by the organization which they belonged. 3. To establish Maritime Safety Tribunal Association which performs Monetary Assistance same as Korean Legal Aid Corporation.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.13 no.12
• /
• pp.441-451
• /
• 2015

The research objective of this study to provide a basis for university basketball players development university basketball players have recovered and fair confidence in the result of the determination of analyzes feel the referee judges recognized research players and referees and by the referee judged that consistency there is. The referee judged according to gender awareness and the impact analysis of college basketball players impartiality, promptness, consistency, reliability p <.05 level There was a statistically significant difference. The referee judged recognition and impact of the exhibition was a statistically significant difference in the p <.05 level of agility. The referee judged recognition and influence of the position was no statistically significant difference in the p <.05 level of agility. impact of the judgment determining recognition fairness, promptness, there was a statistically significant difference in the p <.001 level of reliability. The referee judged of the psychological state is assigned prejudice, there was a statistically significant difference in the p <.001 level.