• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제19권12호
• /
• pp.649-660
• /
• 2021

본 연구의 목적은 중환자실 환자를 대상으로 케어비데로봇을 이용한 배설간호가 실금관련 피부염, 욕창위험도, 생리적 지표(혈청 알부민, 단백질, 헤모글로빈, 림프구 변화)에 미치는 효과를 확인하기 위해 시행되었다. 연구대상은 종합병원 중환자실에 입실한 환자들을 대상으로 케어비데로봇 ((주)큐라코)을 이용하여 실험군에게는 케어비데로봇을 1인당 1대씩 장착하고 실금이 발생 될 시 작동하게 하여 건조 완료하였으며, 대조군에게는 실금이 발생될 시 물티슈로 닦고 자연 건조를 시키는 방법으로 1주간 진행하였다. 수집된 자료는 기술통계, t-test, repeated measured ANONA로 분석하였다. 연구결과 실금 관련 피부염, 욕창 위험도, 알부민, 림프구는 집단간에 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있었다. 본 연구는 케어비데로봇을 이용한 배설간호가 피부 점막에 미치는 효과를 과학적 근거인 생리적 지표로 검증하였다는 점에서 의의가 있으며, 대상자 확대를 통한 추후 연구가 더욱 필요하다.

• 근관절건강학회지
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.52-61
• /
• 2013

Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of education about pressure ulcer classification and incontinence-associated dermatitis on knowledge and self-efficacy in pressure ulcer among nurses. Methods: One group pretest-posttest design was used. Participants were 41 nurses in a tertiary hospital in Seoul. A 90 minutes lecture was delivered. The self-reported-questionnaire on knowledge and self-efficacy and photograph test for knowledge were done at pre- and post-education. Results: After education, there was significant increase in the score of knowledge measured by questionnaire (mean 1.76, p<.001), in the score of knowledge measured by photographs (mean 2.00, p<.001) and in the score of self-efficacy (mean 5.17, p<.001). Conclusion: This study showed that knowledge and self-efficacy in pressure ulcer were improved by the education about pressure ulcer classification and incontinence-associated dermatitis. This program may be used for enhancing nurses' abilities of caring pressure ulcer.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제43권4호
• /
• pp.526-535
• /
• 2013

Purpose: This study was done to compare clinical nurses' knowledge and visual differentiation diagnostic ability for the pressure ulcer classification system (PUCS) and incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD). Methods: A convenience sample of 602 nurses took the pressure ulcer classification system and incontinence-associated dermatitis knowledge test (PUCS & IAD KT) and completed the visual differentiation tool (VDT), consisting of 21 photographs with clinical information. Results: The overall mean score for correct answers was 14.5 (${\pm}3.2$) in PUCS & IAD KT and 11.15 (${\pm}4.9$) in PUCS & IAD VDT. Incorrect responses were most common for statements related to stage III, IAD for PUCS & IAD KT, and suspected deep tissue injury (SDTI), unstageable, and stage III for PUCS & IAD VDT. Significant correlations were found between PUCS & IAD KT and VDT (r=.48, p<.001). Factors affecting scores for PUCS & IAD VDT were PUCS & IAD KT, frequency of pressure ulcer, IAD management and participation in wound care education programs. Conclusion: Results indicate that nurses have an overall understanding of PUCS & IAD, but low visual differentiation ability regarding stage III, SDTI, and unstageable ulcers. Continuing education is needed to further improve knowledge and visual differentiation ability for PUCS & IAD.