• Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
• /
• v.26 no.10
• /
• pp.147-155
• /
• 2021

If one wants to file a lawsuit against the administrative office, he or she should decide whether to file a civil lawsuit or an administrative lawsuit. The type of lawsuit must be determined to determine which court to file the lawsuit with. Korea seems to have a clear distinction between administrative and judicial legal relationships, but it is not easy to distinguish between public and judicial cases unless the public and judicial discrimination are maintained. The practice or precedent of litigation is always difficult to distinguish because the litigation is based on the discrimination of whether the litigation belongs to a legal relationship in public law or judicial law. I believe that if the administrative litigation law establishes a provision related to the designation of a duty and stipulates that "if a litigation case is questioned whether it is an administrative or civil lawsuit, the Supreme Court-related court shall designate the competent court at the request of the parties," the lower court will be guaranteed the right to swift a trial, and the legal representatives will be freed from the exhaustive agony.

• The Korean Journal of Financial Management
• /
• v.11 no.2
• /
• pp.223-257
• /
• 1994

본 연구는 최초공모주식의 저가발행 원인에 대한 보험가설을 미국에서의 실제 소송사례를 중심으로 실증분석한다. Tinic(1988)은 최초공모주의 저가발행이 공모에 따르는 법률적 소송위험과 소송으로 인한 간사회사의 명예손상에 대한 일종의 보험효과를 가지고 있으며, 따라서 저가발행의 크기는 소송위험과 음의 관계에 있다고 주장한다. 또한 보험가설에 의하면 실제 소송이 발생했을 경우에도 저가발행의 크기는 소송결과에 유리하게 작용한다고 한다. 본 연구에서 는 1933-1990 기간동안 미국증권법 제 11조 조항을 위반하여 소송이 제기되었던 사례가운데 실제소송의 결과가 알려진 판례를 중심으로 보험가설의 주장을 실증분석 하였다. 또한 최초공모이후의 공모시장을 통한 기업자금 조달시에 주간사회사의 변경여부를 분석함으로써 소송으로 인한 간사회사의 명예손상의 정도를 파악하고자 했다. 연구결과에 따르면 투자자들에 의한 집단소송의 결과와 최초공모주의 저가발행의 크기에는 유의적인 관계가 있음이 실증적으로 제시되었다. 또한 간사회사의 명성과 실제 현금으로 환원한 소송위험간에도 유의적인 관계가 있음을 보여주고 있다. 한편 소송에 관련된 최초공모주의 경우에는 일단 소송이 제기된 후의 공모를 통한 추가기업자금 조달시에 기존의 간사회사를 전원 교체하는 등 통제집단과는 다른 형태를 보여 줌으로써 보험 가설의 주장을 지지하고 있다.

• Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology
• /
• v.8 no.4
• /
• pp.35-44
• /
• 2018

Unlike other lawsuits, patent infringement litigation is a very difficult case to grasp without expert knowledge of the patented technology. The Patent Agent Act seems to recognize the legal representation of patent agent in Article 8, but the Constitutional Court and the Court have refused to recognize patent agent's legal representation right in the patent infringement suit. In this regard, constant controversy is taking place among patent agents and lawyers. This study examines the measures to enhance the effectiveness and professionalism of patent litigation in patent infringement litigation. This study analyzes the role of patent attorneys in patent infringement lawsuits in major countries and derive rational alternatives. As a result, it is inappropriate to restrict the attorneys' automatic acquisition of patent attorneys' qualifications or revise the patent attorneys' law in relation to the patent attorney's right of proxy. In the case of litigation parties, it is a desirable alternative to introduce a revised patent attorney system for the fundamental problem solving and to allow the litigants to reasonably choose the litigation agent.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.9 no.4
• /
• pp.19-28
• /
• 2011

Nowadays Several Countries like USA and Republic of Korea introduced Electronic Litigation System in the civil sector, and this introduction of electronic system affected several changes dramatically management environments of many firms. Especially in Republic of Korea this electronic litigation system is introduced by the purpose such as decrease paper document, cost down of litigation and the transparence, but till now most enterprises don't prepare about electronic litigation. This introduction of electronic litigation system changes the circumstance of the law environment, firms have to prepare solutions about changes of litigation systems and changes of firma management systems.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.21 no.1
• /
• pp.265-299
• /
• 2018

Patent litigation has been considered as a tool to protect and facilitate innovation. Ironically, yet, the misguided uses of patent litigation as a strategic tool for vigilance against competitors are acting as a hindrance for innovation. Previous studies show that the better the quality of a patent, the higher the chance of the patent being litigated. Therefore, it is particularly important for the innovating firms to take strategic precautions to minimize the risk of patent litigation. This study investigates the moderating role of firms' past alliance experiences on the relationship between patent quality and patent litigation from the perspective of a defendant. A unique dataset on patents, infringement lawsuits, and firm performances in the printed electronics industry confirms that firms' previous alliance experiences mitigate the impact of patent quality on infringement litigation. For instance, the results confirm that the presence of past alliance experience reduces the litigation rate by 33% for firms with median-quality patents. This paper makes two major contributions. First, it contributes to the literature on alliance experience by confirming its role as a reputation in mitigating future litigations. Second, this paper contributes to the literature on patent litigation by identifying a unique moderator, i.e., alliance experience, on the linkage between patent quality and litigation. An innovating firm is likely to become an alleged infringer under a false accusation. Therefore, this paper focuses on firms that partake in infringement lawsuits unwillingly. Despite the importance, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate patent litigations from the perspective of defendants.

• Journal of Legislation Research
• /
• no.55
• /
• pp.193-237
• /
• 2018

The recent surge in the ISD lawsuit filed against the Korean government is likely to cause major domestic confusion. This is because in most cases, foreign investors have claimed billions of won in damages filed against Korea in the ISD lawsuit. Public opinion will be generated to abolish the ISD lawsuit system, which is included in the international investment agreement, when a decision comes out in the Elliott/Mason case or Lone Star case, which has already been completed by the hearing. It is clear that the ISD clause, which is commonly included in most of the BITs, FTAs, can be a limiting factor in the government's public policy, as shown by many investment disputes. However, it is not necessary to have a negative view of the ISD clause itself, given that it is a system that can protect Korean investors from illegal and inappropriate actions by local governments. Since Korea already allows the system of ISD lawsuits with many countries through FTAs and BITs, and negotiations are underway to sign FTAs with new countries, the possibility that foreign investors will refer to the ISD proceeding further to our government's public policy will increase. In order to prepare for an ISD lawsuit, the Korean government has launched a response team consisting of government practitioners, private scholars, and legal professionals in the central government ministries to review major legal issues that are controversial in the cases of the ISD. In particular, local governments and public institutions, which fail to recognize the importance of international investment regulations and ISD clause, need to share and train relevant information so that all processes for public policy planning and implementation comply with international investment rules such as BITs and FTAs.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction
• /
• v.20 no.6
• /
• pp.567-576
• /
• 2020

This study proposes additional items to be recognized as defects in a defect lawsuit through a case analysis of lawsuit cases in apartment housing. Identifying these defects prevents an unexpected increase in litigation costs, delays in the date of litigation, and emotion repercussions or additional lawsuits. In this study, the defects that were not discovered by the existing occupants and construction companies, but were newly discovered in litigation, were defined as defects in lawsuits. Fifteen cases of lawsuits were analyzed and a total of 77 defects were derived. Each item was then reviewed for location, work type, number of occurrences, and cost. The results were yielded 23 defect items, which were validated by appraisers who directly appraised the cases. In addition, the derived defect factors were analyzed. Finally, the 23 defect items were categorized into 10 main factors which include attributes such as causes of occurrence and characteristics. This can provide an overall area of defects to be considered in addition to existing defect items in the life cycle of the housing. The results of this study can contribute to reducing the actual occurrence of defects and minimizing the disputes in the case of defect lawsuits.

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• no.10 s.195
• /
• pp.53-56
• /
• 2006

시공을 하다가 손해를 보았는데도 발주자 혹은 원도급업체에서 인정을 안해준다면 어떻게 해야 할까? "소송을 할까?", "다음 공사는 어떻게 해. 그냥 손해보고 말지 뭐", "아니야 그냥 넘어가기에는 너무 억울해" 설비건설업을 하다보면 누구나 한번쯤 이런 경험이 있었을 것이다. 이럴 경우 공정거래위원회에 문의 하거나 건설하도급 분쟁조정협의회에 문의하다가 정 안될 경우 소송에 돌입한다. 소송의 경우 대법원의 최종 판결이 나기까지 2~3년은 고스란히 걸림은 물론 소송비용도 만만치 않다. 이렇게 기간이 길지 않고 가격도 저렴하면서 해결 가능한 방법은 없을까? 물론 있다. 본지가 지난 7월부터 연재한 대한상사중재원과 건설하도급분쟁조정협의회, 공정거래위원회 등을 통해 해결 가능하다. 이번 호에는 그동안 게재되었던 건설분쟁시의 해결방안에 대한 총론으로 민사분쟁의 소송외적 해결제도 및 건설분쟁의 소송외적 해결제도, 건설공사 계약문서별 분쟁해결 조항에 대하여 게재한다.

• Food Industry
• /
• s.186
• /
• pp.9-10
• /
• 2005

현재 식품안전기본법제정과 관련하여 정부안을 포합하여 5개 법안이 국회에 상정$\cdot$발의되어 있다.그러나 대부분의 법안들이 식품사고를 사전에 방지하는 식품의 안전성 확보보다는 사후적인 피해구제인 집단소송제나 분쟁조정을 골자로 하고 있다. 이에 우리 협회에서는 지난 4월 8일 식품안전기본법안에 대한 산업계 의견을 마련하여 집단분쟁조정 및 집단소송제 도입의 비현실성 및 문제점을 지적하고, 자칫 잦은 식품분쟁이나 집단소송국가로 전락할 우려가 크기 때문에 강력한 반대의견을 정부와 국회에 정책건의 한 바 있다. 식품안전의 1차적인 책임은 물론 식품업계에 있고 식품안전은 아무리 강조하여도 지나치지 않다. 그러나 식품안전은 소비자에게 피해가 발생하기 전에 사전에 방지할 수 있는 적절한 제도의 도입이 필요한 것이지, 그렇지 않고 이미 사고가 발생한 후에 피해구제를 위한 방안으로 도입되는 집단분쟁조정이나 집단소송제도는 실제적인 소비자보호 효과가 미흡하고, 식품안전과는 거리가 멀다고 생각한다. 따라서 우리 협회에서는 식품안전기본법제정과 관련하여 국회입법을 검토중에 있는 집단분쟁조정과 집단소송제도에 대하여 다음과 같이 전문가의 의견을 들어보고자 한다.

• 발명특허
• /
• v.36 no.10
• /
• pp.12-19
• /
• 2011

우리나라의 주요 경제 교역국 중 하나인 영국의 특허소송 체계, 특허법원 및 소송절차에 대해 살펴 봄으로써 우리나라 발명가와 기업이 영국 및 유럽에서의 특허 분쟁 관련 경쟁력을 어떻게 확보해야 하는지 알아보자.