• 대한기계학회논문집A
• /
• 제34권7호
• /
• pp.911-917
• /
• 2010

본 연구에서는 열적-기계적 주기하중을 받고 있는 엔진 배기매니폴드에 대해서 열응력 해석방법과 열피로수명 예측과정을 제시하였다. 즉, 파손현상이 복잡한 배기시스템의 효율적인 유한요소 모델링 방법과 온도 의존성 재료의 시험결과를 이용한 해석 데이터 구성, 그리고 열사이클 하중에 대한 열응력 및 파손 예측방법을 디젤엔진의 배기매니폴드에 대해서 나타내었다. 일반적으로 배기매니폴드의 파손 취약부에서는 고온영역에서 큰 압축소성변형이 발생하고 냉각시에는 인장의 잔류응력이 나타난다. 따라서 이같은 응력과 변형률의 이력곡선으로부터 소성변형의 진폭 또는 소성에너지의 크기를 얻을 수 있으며 이를 통해서 피로수명을 예측할 수 있다.

• 대한기계학회논문집A
• /
• 제27권11호
• /
• pp.1856-1863
• /
• 2003

Overlay model had several advantages to describe hysteretic behavior of material and showed good capability for many engineering materials. However, this model is only applicable to material obeying Masing postulate. Some materials such as 316L stainless steel do not follow Masing postulate and show cyclic hardening(or softening) and strain range dependence. Low cycle fatigue tests of 316L stainless steel at 600$^{\circ}C$ were performed to investigate the characteristics of cyclic behavior of non-Masing material. From all tests cyclic softening was observed. There were differences in elastic limit of hysteresis loop according to applied strain range. To consider these features, modified overlay model was developed. Yield stresses of subelements were divided into isotropic and anisotropic part to describe the non-Masing behavior. The plastic strain range memorization was introduced to consider the strain range dependence. The prediction using modified overlay model showed a good accordance to actual hysteresis loops.

• 대한기계학회논문집A
• /
• 제28권10호
• /
• pp.1603-1611
• /
• 2004

The validity of 'modified overlay model' to describe the cyclic behavior of annealed 316L stainless steel at room temperature was investigated. Material parameters(~f$_{i}$, m$_{i}$b, η, E) fur the model were obtained through constant strain amplitude test. The strain amplitude dependency of elastic limit and cyclic hardening, which were the characteristics of this model, were considered. Eight subelements were used to describe the nonlinearity of the hysteresis loops. The calculated hysteresis curve in each condition (0.5％, 0.7％, 0.9％ train amplitude test) was very close to the experimental one. Two tests, incremental step test and 5-step test, ere performed to check the validity of 'modified overlay model'. The elastic limit was saturated to the one of the highest strain amplitudes of the block in the incremental step test, so it seemed to be Masing material at the stabilized block. Cyclic hardening was successfully described in the increasing sequence of the strain amplitude in 5-step test. But, the slight cyclic softening followed by higher strain amplitude would not be able to simulate by'modified overlay model'. However, the discrepancy induced was very small between the calculated hystereses and the experimental ones. In conclusion,'Modified overlay model'was proved to be appropriate in strain range of 0.35％~ 1.0％..0％.