• Korean Architects
• /
• s.513
• /
• pp.68-71
• /
• 2012

자연과 인간 그리고 공간은 함께 존재하지만, 그 점유 방식과 목적은 서로 다르다. 공간은 인간에 의하여 창조되지만 결국에는 자연에 근거하며, 자연은 인간의 공간창조 행위에 의해 이미 변질되고 파괴된다. 가속화 된 도시화로 인하여 야기된 문제를 자연과 인간, 공간의 조화로운 공존이라는 측면으로 모색하기 위하여 생태건축(Ecological Architecture)을 그 방책의 하나로 주목하고자 한다. 본 글에서는 자연과 인간 그리고 공간의 조화로운 공존을 위한 건축적 측면으로의 대표적인 방법인 생태건축의 현실에 대하여 알아보고, 자연에 대한 태도를 담은 감성의 생태건축적인 적용 가능성에 대하여 생가해 보고자 한다.

• The Magazine of the Society of Air-Conditioning and Refrigerating Engineers of Korea
• /
• v.29 no.6
• /
• pp.15-19
• /
• 2000

환경문제의 윤리적 실천을 위한 구체적인 방안으로 인간과 자연의 공존모색, 새로운 자연보전제도의 수립, 올바른 생태학적 지식에 따른 건축계획 등을 제시하고, 정부의 자연보전정책을 실질적으로 강력하게 그 모범을 주는 의미에서 생태건축도시의 생성과 산·학·연 그리고 민간의 참여로 생태건축의 활성화를 도모하고자 함.

• KIEAE Journal
• /
• v.8 no.5
• /
• pp.23-34
• /
• 2008

This paper reviews the relationships between diverse ecological design strategies and competing conceptions of ecological approach in place making. It focuses conceptual trends of what we categorize a building "green" and outlines a social constructive perspective on the development of sustainable architecture. This study classifies seven logics of ecological design-eco-technical, eco-aesthetical, eco-social, eco-medical, eco-renewable, eco-cultural, eco-central - which have their roots in competing philosophies of environmentalism. In my analysis of the logics concerning sustainable architecture, the adapted and incorporated technology from high-tech to low-tech levels is a key issue. These points lead us to propose a way that each logic configures the technological approaches and alternative visions of sustainable places. This paper discusses the implications of the competent nature of plural ecological design perspectives for architectural education, practice, and researches.

• Korean Architects
• /
• s.512
• /
• pp.81-83
• /
• 2011

• Korean Architects
• /
• s.538
• /
• pp.74-78
• /
• 2014

• Korean Architects
• /
• s.511
• /
• pp.80-82
• /
• 2011

• KIEAE Journal
• /
• v.4 no.2
• /
• pp.65-72
• /
• 2004

Ecological architecture enables people to recycle and reuse architectural resources within the category of ecosystem and also to minimize the effect on environment in a whole process, including architectural planning, usage and exhaustion to use sustainable energies. Rammed earth wall construction method utilized in EcoCenter located in Crystalwaters ecological village in Austrailia is a good example, which maximizes its advantages and also covers its limits to use soil and wood as structural resources. In a case of wood, they used non-treated timber to minimize environmental load and utilized used materials in openings. In the roofs, aluminum coated steel which is plated with zinc collects rain effectively even though it is not regenerable. Nontoxic finishes and insulation in floor and ceiling with used papers are able to minimize its environmental load. Solar energy system applied in EcoCenter enables them to market extra energy with electricity companies as well as support needs of its own buildings to utilize photovoltaic panel system with PV panels. Passive solar system is planned effectively in heating and cooling to apply regenerative walls in a use of rammed earth wall construction and natural ventilation systems through openings.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture Conference
• /
• 2023.04a
• /
• pp.22-24
• /
• 2023

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Building Construction Conference
• /
• 2012.05a
• /
• pp.189-190
• /
• 2012

• Journal of architectural history
• /
• v.15 no.2
• /
• pp.147-154
• /
• 2006