• Title/Summary/Keyword: 생명권

Search Result 702, Processing Time 0.023 seconds

The Relationship of the Empathy and Biomedical Ethics Awareness with University Student (대학생의 공감과 생명의료윤리의식의 연관성)

  • We, Ji Hee;Chang, Back Hee;Lim, Myung Ho
    • The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
    • /
    • v.17 no.4
    • /
    • pp.500-509
    • /
    • 2017

  • The purpose of this study was to evaluate the level of biomedical ethics awareness, empathy among college students. The participants were 469 university students in South Korea. The average score for biomedical ethics awareness was $2.89{\pm}.21$ ; The average the scores of empathy was $2.41{\pm}.35$. Biomedical ethics awareness showed a positive correlation with empathy(r=.203, p<.001). Emotional empathy showed a significant effect on biomedical ethics awareness. And the empathic concern of emotional empathy showed a significant effect on right to life fetus, artificial abortion, artificial insemination, prenatal diagnosis of fetus, right to life of newborn, euthanasia, brain death of biomedical ethics awareness. The results of this study suggest that biomedical ethics education to the emotional empathy should need for general university students.

  • https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2017.17.04.500 인용 PDF KSCI

The right to life of embryos and Women's an abortion right (태아(胎兒)의 생명권(生命權)과 여성(女性)의 낙태권(落胎權))

  • Lee, cheol-ho
    • Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
    • /
    • 2010.05a
    • /
    • pp.224-226
    • /
    • 2010

  • 산부인과 의사 모임인 '프로라이프(prolife)'가 불법 낙태 시술 병원 3곳을 고발한 것을 계기로 낙태문제가 사회적 이슈로 등장하고, 찬반논쟁이 뜨겁다. 전국여성연대 등 여성단체들은 여성의 선택권(prochoice)을 내세우며 낙태 병원을 고발한 의사들을 비난하고, 아기를 낳지 못할 상황이거나, 키울 수 없는 여성에게 낙태 선택권을 인정해야 한다고 주장하고 있다. 1970~80년대에는 정부가 인구억제 정책을 펴며 낙태불감증을 조장했다. 1년에 34만여 명의 태아가 사라지는 '낙태공화국'이 된 데는 정부의 책임이 적지 않다고 본다. 본고에서는 낙태와 관련하여 태아의 생명권을 우선해야 할 것인가? 여성의 출산권(낙태권)을 인정할 것인가에 대한 문제를 헌법적(憲法的) 관점(觀點)에서 검토하고, 우리나라의 판례와 미국의 판례를 중심으로 낙태문제를 논구(論究)해보고자 한다.

  • PDF

A Study on Human Rights in North Korea in terms of Haewon-sangsaeng (해원상생 관점에서의 북한인권문제 고찰)

  • Kim Young-jin
    • Journal of the Daesoon Academy of Sciences
    • /
    • v.43
    • /
    • pp.67-102
    • /
    • 2022

  • The purpose of this study is to analyze the human rights found in the North Korean Constitution and their core problem by focusing on elements of human rights suggested by Daesoon Jinrihoe's doctrine of Haewon-sangsaeng (解冤相生 the Resolution of Grievances for Mutual Beneficence). Haewon-sangsaeng is seemingly the only natural law that could resolve human resentment lingering from the Mutual Contention of the Former World while leading humans work for the betterment of one another. Haewon-sangsaeng, as a natural law, includes the right to life, the right to autonomous decision-making, and duty to act according to human dignity (physical freedom, the freedom of conscience, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of press, etc.), the right to equal treatment in one's social environment, and the right to ensure the highest level of health through treatment. The North Korean Constitution does not have a character as an institutional device to guarantee natural human rights, the fundamental principle of the Constitution, and stipulates the right of revolutionary warriors to defend dictators and dictatorships. The right to life is specified so that an individual's life belongs to the life of the group according to their socio-political theory of life. Rights to freedom are stipulated to prioritize group interests over individual interests in accordance with the principle of collectivism. The right to equality and the right to health justify discrimination through class discrimination. The right to life provided to North Koreans is not guaranteed due to the death penalty system found within the North Korean Criminal Code and the Criminal Code Supplementary Provisions. The North Korean regime deprives North Koreans of their right to die with dignity through public executions. The North Korean regime places due process under the direction of the Korea Worker's Party, recognizes religion as superstition or opium, and the Korea Worker's Party acknowledge the freedoms of bodily autonomy, religion, media, or press. North Koreans are classified according to their status, and their rights to equality are not guaranteed because they are forced to live a pre-modern lifestyle according to the patriarchal order. In addition, health rights are not guaranteed due biased availability selection and accessibility in the medical field as well as the frequent shortages of free treatments.

  • https://doi.org/10.25050/jdaos.2022.43.0.67 인용 PDF