• The Korean Nurse
• /
• v.13 no.2 s.70
• /
• pp.31-33
• /
• 1974

• The Korean Nurse
• /
• v.13 no.2 s.70
• /
• pp.34-38
• /
• 1974

• The Science & Technology
• /
• v.20 no.9 s.220
• /
• pp.16-22
• /
• 1987

• 건축구조
• /
• v.18 no.5
• /
• pp.15-16
• /
• 2011

• 정보화사회
• /
• s.38
• /
• pp.28-31
• /
• 1991

• 정보화사회
• /
• s.13
• /
• pp.15-15
• /
• 1988

• 대학교육
• /
• s.2
• /
• pp.64-67
• /
• 1983

• Venture DIGEST
• /
• s.9
• /
• pp.6-7
• /
• 2002

• Journal of Information Management
• /
• v.30 no.2
• /
• pp.53-68
• /
• 1999

This paper focuses on the critique of citation analysis and then attempts to prospect for the future. The development of citation analysis has been marked by the invention of new techniques and measures, the exploitation of new tools, and the needs of evaluation of scientific research. Normative theory takes the lead in this development. But critics have questioned both the assumptions and methods of citation analysis. This critics are based on the microsociological perspective.

• 한국사회복지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2002.10b
• /
• pp.23-30
• /
• 2002