• The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
• /
• no.32
• /
• pp.45-78
• /
• 2012

The significance of Presidential Impeachment in 2004 is subject to interpretations in many different contexts, but its nature as its justice was the constitutional trial by the nation's impeachment system. This study set out to compare and analyze the understanding of the event centered around its nature as "an impeachment event as a public activity" and the records related to it. For that purpose, the study attempted to analyze the impeachment event to understand it as a public activity and examined and analyzed the records of the impeachment event in the public domain through personal visit, phone interview, and request of information disclosure based on the analysis results. An impeachment event as a public activity can be understood as an activity carried out by the National Assembly, which is to issue a motion for impeachment under the norms of the nation's impeachment system, and Constitutional Court, which is responsible for impeachment trial, through their unique rights prescribed in the Constitution. The important subjects of such a public activity included the accused president, the acting presidential system created by the motion for impeachment, and the National Election Commission that provided a decisive ground for impeachment. It was confirmed that the records, which are legal requirements, were well created and have been preserved and managed in the public domain. However, it was difficult to conclude that the records of the impeachment event were thoroughly created in terms of content in relation to affairs as they mainly covered the superficial treatment processes and the results of explicit activities. There was, in particular, the absence of records showing the context of activity.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Industrial Safety Conference
• /
• 1998.11a
• /
• pp.219-224
• /
• 1998

확률론적 안전성 평가(Probabilistic Safety Assessment PSA)나 정량적인 위험도 평가(Quantitative Risk Assessment: QRA)에서 인간신뢰도분석(human reliability analysis)은 인간행위를 기기처럼 생각하여 전체 시스템의 안전성에 중요한 초기사건(initiating event) 이전이나 초기사건 이후 또는 초기사건을 유발하는 인간행위를 파악하고 정량화하여, 확률론적 평가의 논리구조인 사건 및 고장수목(event tree 및 fault tree)이나 사고경위 단절집합 (accident sequence outsets)에 포함시키는 것이다. (중략)

• Journal of Korea Fair Competition Federation
• /
• no.125
• /
• pp.27-31
• /
• 2006

공정위는 지난해 12월 7일 마이크로소프트(MS)사의 독점규제및공정거래에 관한 법률(이하 "공정거래법"이라 함) 위반행위에 대하여 시정명령을 하고 과징금 325억원을 부과했다. MS사가 부당한 끼워팔기를 통해 경쟁사업자를 시장에서 배제하고, 소비자의 이익을 현저히 저해하였다는 것이 그 이유다. MS 사건은 공정위 역사상 가장 긴 조사와 심의를 거쳤음은 물론 고도의 법적, 경제학적, 기술적 쟁점들에 대한 치열한 공방과 심도있는 분석이 이루어진 그 의미가 매우 큰 사건이다. 본 고에서는 이러한 MS 사건의 조사단계부터 최종 의결이 있기까지 진행된 심사경위를 간략히 정리해본다.

• The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences
• /
• v.26 no.10A
• /
• pp.1653-1661
• /
• 2001

네트워크관리는 오늘날 통신 및 기업네트워크의 복잡하고 엄격한 성능과 유용성을 극복하는 방법으로 최근에 많은 주목을 받고 있다. 네트워크에서 발생하는 사건들을 통합하는 사건상관은 이 문제점들을 해결하는데 가장 효과적이고 필요한 방법으로 여겨지고 있다. 이 분야에 대한 연구가 10년도 넘게 진행되었지만 현재까지 개발된 방법들에 대해 총괄적으로 다룬 논문을 찾기가 어렵다. 이 논문에서는 사건상관이 왜 필요한지를 보이며, 여러 논문들과 상업제품에서 발견되는 방법들을 소개하며, 그리고 마지막으로 해결되어야 할 문제점들을 고려한다.

• Journal of Korean Society of Transportation
• /
• v.35 no.6
• /
• pp.469-480
• /
• 2017

On April 1, 2004, KTX (Korea Train eXpress), the first HSR (High-Speed Rail) in Korea, was introduced to Gyeongbu Line. The introduction of the KTX service led to a change in the number of passengers for Gyeongbu Line. Previous studies have analyzed the pre and post-event changes of the intervening events by either simple statistics or intervention ARIMA analysis. However, the intervention ARIMA model has a limitation that several assumptions such as the occurrence time and the type of intervention events are necessary. To this end, this study analyzed the effects of intervention event on the number of passengers using the Gyeongbu line based on a time series outlier detection technique which can overcome limitations in the previous studies. The time series outlier detection technique can analyze the time, effect type and size of an intervention event without the assumption of the time and effect type of the intervention event. The data were collected from the Korea Transport Database (KTDB) for twelve years from 2003 to 2014 (144 months). The analysis results showed that the size of the influence type in the same intervention events was different across the major city routes, and the intervention event which could not be found by previous study methods was also found.

• 발명특허
• /
• v.6 no.5 s.63
• /
• pp.53-53
• /
• 1981

• 발명특허
• /
• v.6 no.6 s.64
• /
• pp.55-55
• /
• 1981

• 전기의세계
• /
• v.60 no.10
• /
• pp.23-31
• /
• 2011

• 보건세계
• /
• v.53 no.6 s.598
• /
• pp.10-13
• /
• 2006

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.20 no.6
• /
• pp.445-459
• /
• 2020

The purpose of this study was to verify the mediating effect of decentering between centrality of event and meaning reconstruction, based on relational loss experiences. To do so, surveys were conducted on 295 people(male: 109, female: 186) who would experience relational loss and be over 20 years old in the country using a questionnaire including a relational loss history checklist, the CES(Centrality of Event Scale), the Decentering Scale and the GMRI(Grief and Meaning Reconstruction Inventory). And the valid data were statistically processed using SPSS 22.0 program. The results of the study was followed. First, both centrality of event and decentering had positive corrleations with meaning reconstruction. Second, decentering completely mediated relationship of centrality of event and meaning reconstruction. Centrality of event had no direct effect on meaning reconstruction and the entire effect of centrality of event on meaning reconstruction was transmitted only through the path of decentering. Based on these results, limitations and implications of this study and suggestions for future studies were discussed.