• Journal of Power System Engineering
• /
• v.15 no.3
• /
• pp.31-37
• /
• 2011

직조 금속 스크린 리브(rib) 이 바닥에 설치된 사각 덕트에서 열전달과 유체유동의 압력강하를 측정하기 위해 실험적 연구를 수행하였다. 시험부의 치수는 200 mm(W) ${\times}$ 40 mm(H) ${\times}$ 712 mm(L)이고 수력직경은 66.6 mm이다. 입구영역에는 1.72m 길이의 가열되지 않은 동일한 치수의 채널을 설치하였다. 메쉬가 다른 4가지의 직조금속 스크린 리브에 대해 측정하였다. 그리고 비교를 위해 일체형 리브에 대해서도 측정하였다. 국부 열전달 계수의 측정에는 스테인레스 강제 포일(foil) 히터와 T형 열전대률 이용하였다. 레이놀즈 수는 23,000에서 58,000의 범위이다. 덕트의 수력직경($D_h$)에 대한 직조 금속 리브의 높이(e)의 비($e/D_h$)는 0.075 이고 리브 간격(p)과 높이의 비(p/e)는 10이다. 실험 결과 메쉬가 없는 일체형 리입에서 가장 누셀트 수와 마찰계수가 컷다.

• Proceedings of the KSME Conference
• /
• 2001.06e
• /
• pp.398-403
• /
• 2001

Pressure drop at a helical square duct orifice is numerically evaluated. The orifice is installed at the entrance of a once-through steam generator tube to suppress flow instabilities. The calculated results are compared with the available experimental correlations, and showed good agreement. Effects of curvature ratio and characteristics of the secondary flow with Reynolds number are reported. Through the numerical simulations, pressure drop mechanisms were well understood inside the compact and complicated orifice geometry.

• Korean Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Engineering
• /
• v.13 no.12
• /
• pp.1184-1195
• /
• 2001

Analysis of fluid flow in rectangular ducts has been conducted since it has a wide application. The purpose is to provide experimental data for the comparison with computational results. Velocity distributions inside a rectangular duct with $90^{\circ}$ mitered elbow are measured by 5W laser doppler velocity meter for Reynolds numbers of 4,049, 8,104, and 12,186. Flow rates obtained by the integration of measured velocity profile at three cross-sections, which are inlet, middle section after the elbow, and outlet, have errors less than 0.9% among them. Turbulent fluctuation components in two directions are found to have almost similar magnitude each other at a certain location due to the isotropic characteristic of turbulence.

• Proceedings of the Korean Nuclear Society Conference
• /
• 2002.10a
• /
• pp.161-161
• /
• 2002

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering Conference
• /
• 2009.10a
• /
• pp.605-606
• /
• 2009

• Journal of Power System Engineering
• /
• v.15 no.5
• /
• pp.43-48
• /
• 2011

The article represents an experimental investigation on friction and turbulent flow characteristics of free airflow through a rectangular duct fitted with semicircular ribs of uniform height (e = 3.5 mm) on one principle wall. The aspect ratio of the rectangular duct was AR= 5 where the duct height (H) was of 30 mm. Four different rib pitches (P) of 28 mm, 35 mm, 42 mm and 49 mm were used for constant rib height to hydraulic diameter ratio (e/Dh = 0.07) and constant rib height to channel height ratio (e/H = 0.11). The experimental results show some significant effects on pressure drop as well as turbulent characteristics at various configurations among different numbers of rib arrangements varying Reynolds number in the range of 15000 to 30000. Pressure transducer and hot wire anemometer were used for data acquisition of this experiment.

• Proceedings of the KSME Conference
• /
• 2002.08a
• /
• pp.71-74
• /
• 2002

Fluid flow in a rectangular duct system are measured by W laser doppler velocity meter, and also computed by commercial software of STAR-CD for comparison between then First, for a rectangular duct with 90 degree metered elbow, the fluid flow with Reynolds numbs's of 1,508 is predicted by assumption of both laminar and turbulent models. But, even though the Reynolds number is less than 2,300-3,000, the computation by turbulent model is close to the experimental data. Moeover, the computation by turbulent model for Reynolds number of 11,751 also predicts the experimental data satisfactorily. Second, for a rectangular duct with two branch ducts, the ratios between flow rates in the two branches are invariant to Reynolds number according to both of numerical and experimental results.

• Korean Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Engineering
• /
• v.13 no.5
• /
• pp.341-347
• /
• 2001

A comparison of fully developed heat transfer and friction factor characteristics has been made in rectangular ducts with ones roughened by five different shapes. The effects of rib shape geometries and Reynolds number are examined. The rib height-to-duct hydraulic diameter, pitch-to height ratio, and aspect ratio of channel width to height are fixed at $e$/De=0.0476, P/$e$=8, and W/H=2.33, respectively. To understand the mechanisms of the heat transfer enhancements, the measurements of the friction factors are also conducted in the smooth and rough channels. The data indicates that the triangular type rib has a substantially higher heat transfer performance than any other ones in the range we studied.

• Korean Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Engineering
• /
• v.14 no.9
• /
• pp.766-773
• /
• 2002

Flow distributions in a rectangular duct with two branch ducts are measured by 5 W laser doppler velocity meter. The fluid flows are also computed by commercial soft-ware of STAR-CD for comparison between them. The Reynolds numbers in the main duct are from 4,226 to 17,491. The ratios distributed into two branches from the main duct are in-variant to Reynolds numbers according to both of numerical and experimental results. However computed velocity profiles at exit of each branch are somewhat different from measured profiles at the same location.

• Journal of Advanced Marine Engineering and Technology
• /
• v.26 no.6
• /
• pp.670-678
• /
• 2002

Fluid flow in a rectangular duct with $90^{\circ}$ mitered elbow is measured by 5W laser doppler velocity meter. The fluid flow is also computed by commercial software of STAR-CD for comparison between measured and computed velocity profiles in the duct. Reynolds numbers for the comparison are 1,608 and 11,751 based on mean velocity and hydraulic diameter of the duct. First, the fluid flow of Reynolds number equal to 1,608 is predicted by assumptions of both laminar and turbulent models. But, even though the Reynolds number is less than 2,300~3,000, the computation by turbulent model is closed to the experimental data than that by laminar model. Second, the computation for Reynolds number of 11,751 by turbulent model also predicted the experimental data satisfactorily.