• 실천공학교육논문지
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.105-114
• /
• 2024

최근 소프트웨어 역량이 강조됨에 따라 대학에서는 전공 구분없이 모든 학생들에게 소프트웨어 교육을 진행하고 있다. 비전공자들은 소프트웨어 교육에 대한 동기부여가 부족하고, 생소한 학습 콘텐츠에 대한 체감 난이도가 높은 문제가 있다. 이를 해결하기 위해 학습자 특성에 맞는 소프트웨어 교육을 제공해야 한다. 예술계열 학생들은 시각에 대한 이해와 표현력이 뛰어나므로 시각적 문해력을 활용하면 프로그래밍 교육의 학습효과를 높일 수 있다고 본다. 본 연구에서는 일상의 문제를 순서도와 의사코드로 분해하여 절차적으로 시각적 이미지를 구성한다. 이를 교육용 프로그래밍 언어인 플레이봇을 이용하여 코딩을 하고 문제를 해결하도록 진행하여 수업의 효과를 분석하고자 한다. 이를 통해 학생들은 프로그래밍의 개념을 이해하고, 문제를 컴퓨팅적 사고로 해결하는 과정을 이해할 수 있으며, 프로그래밍을 자신의 전공에 활용하는 방법을 습득할 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

• 산경연구논집
• /
• 제10권11호
• /
• pp.71-80
• /
• 2019

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to design the curriculum of Basic College Software Programming to develop creative and logical-thinking. This course is guided by algorithmic thinking and logical thinking that can be solved by computing for problem-solving, and it helps to develop by software through basic programming education. Through the stage of problem analysis, abstraction, algorithm, data structure, and algorithm implementation, the curriculum is designed to help learners experience algorithm problem-solving in various areas to develop diffusion thinking. For Learners aim to achieve the balanced development of divergent and convergent-thinking needed in their creative problem-solving skills. Research design, data and methodology: This study is to design a basic software education for improving algorithm-thinking for non-major. The curriculum designed in this paper is necessary to non-majors students who have completed the 'Creative Thinking and Coding Course' Design Thinking based are targeted. For this, contents were extracted through advanced research analysis at home and abroad, and experts in computer education, computer engineering, SW education, and education were surveyed in the form of quasi-openness. Results: In this study, based on ADD Thinking's algorithm thinking, we divided the unit college majors into five groups so that students of each major could accomplish the goal of "the ability to internalize their own ideas into computing," and extracted and designed different content areas, content elements and sub-components from each group. Through three expert surveys, we established a strategy for characterization by demand analysis and major/textbook category and verified the appropriateness of the design direction to ensure that the subjects and contents of the curriculum are appropriate for each family in order to improve algorithm-thinking. Conclusions: This study helps develop software by enhancing the ability of students who practice various subjects and exercises to explore creative expressions in various areas, such as 'how to think like a computer' that can implement and execute their ideas in computing. And it helps increase the ability to think logical and algorithmic computing based on creative solutions, improving problem-solving ability based on computing thinking and fundamental understanding of computer coding and development of logical thinking ability through programming.