• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.87-94
• /
• 2012

The apartment reconstruction projects have the proper functions such as residential environment improvement and the new housing allocation system; however, intention of the projects are distorted by the combination of factors, like failure of relocation of the original occupants and income redistribution, speculation in real estate, sharp rise in housing price, disputation between various interested parties, inadequate system and etc and it makes the projects unable to go well. Disputations and litigations are due to spread of the small conflict. As a result of the problems, it could not going smoothly and that lead to increase or stop the period and cost. This study is to estimate the period and cost using the conflict index so as to prevent and solve the problem which is among the conflict in the reverse functions. The conflict index has estimated focus on the conflict impact and the period and cost has been estimated using an variable independent including the conflict index. Also, estimated the conflict index and estimate of the period and cost are able to succeed with a minimum of disputation and money.

• KDI Journal of Economic Policy
• /
• v.45 no.4
• /
• pp.57-77
• /
• 2023

The Chonsei component holds the highest level of weight (5.4%) in the composition of the Korean consumer price index (CPI). The variations in Chonsei prices are directly reflected in the CPI as a representation of cost swings. The Chonsei refers to a deposit that accumulates the costs related to housing services and is mostly affected by variations in rental rates. Nevertheless, it is important to note that Chonsei prices are also susceptible to fluctuations in interest rates, regardless of the rent prices. Therefore, if Chonsei were directly and one-to-one indexed to the CPI, they could include changes other than residential service prices. After analyzing the time series data of the Chonsei index and rent index inside the CPI, it becomes apparent that the Chonsei index displays an average annual growth rate of 2.3%, whilst the rent index reveals a growth rate of 0.9%. The observed disparity in growth rates indicates a divergence in trends between the two indices. It is posited that the Chonsei index, when capitalized, has had a more rapid increase compared to the rental index, owing to the gradual drop in interest rates. To effectively reflect fluctuations in the housing service costs, proxies for the Chonsei index were utilized in the construction of a consumer price index. The findings of our study suggest that, overall, the newly developed CPI demonstrates a comparatively lower rate of inflation when compared to the official CPI. Furthermore, the inclusion of imputed rents for owner-occupied housing in CPI amplifies this effect.

• Journal of Korean Society of Coastal and Ocean Engineers
• /
• v.23 no.6
• /
• pp.422-428
• /
• 2011

Optimal reliability indices were found by optimizing life cycle cost(LCC) of pier type quay walls. Failure probability of pier and shore bridge were calculated by response surface method. Then, they were used to obtain recovery cost after damage. Costs for initial construction and maintenance were also considered in finding optimal reliability indices. Target reliability indices which may be used in reliability based design were suggested by numerical examples under seismic load and ship load.

• KDI Journal of Economic Policy
• /
• v.11 no.4
• /
• pp.23-38
• /
• 1989

본고(本稿)에서는 원화표시수입물가지수(貨表示輸入物價指數) 및 단위노동비용(單位勞動費用) 등의 비용요인(費用要因)과 GNP디플레이터로 표시한 물가(物價)와의 관계를 공적분검증방법(共積分檢證方法)으로 살펴보았는데 단위노동비용(單位勞動費用)과 물가간(物價間)에는 유의한 장기적(長期的) 균형관계(均衡關係)가 존재하나 이 관계식(關係式)에 수입물가지수(輸入物價指數)를 추가하기는 곤란한 것으로 나타났으며 수입물가지수(輸入物價指數)와 물가간(物價間)에도 유의한 장기적(長期的) 균형관계(均衡關係)를 발견하지 못하였다. 이에 따라 공적분(共積分)과 오차수정모형(誤差修正模型)을 사용하여 단위노동비용(單位勞動費用)만으로 인플레식(式)을 추정(推定)한 결과 그 적합도가 뛰어난 것으로 나타났다. 추정결과(推定結果)에 의하면 단위노동비용상승(單位勞動費用上昇)의 물가(物價)에 대한 영향은 영구적이며 최조 2년반 동안에 최대로 나타날 뿐 아니라 과도조정(過度調整)(overshooting)현상(現象)이 있는 것으로 나타났다. 이에 따라 비록 90년도의 임금인상(賃金引上)이 상당폭 둔화(鈍化)된다 하더라도 87년 하반기부터 시작된 단위노동비용급증(單位勞動費用急增)의 누적적 효과로 인하여 90년의 상당히 높은 인플레율은 불가피할 것으로 전망되었다. 마지막으로 이와 같은 물가상승압력(物價上昇壓力)을 완화하기 위해서 정책입안자(政策立案者)의 입장에서 본고(本稿)의 연구결과(硏究結果)에 대해 어떠한 해석이 가능한가를 논의하였는데, 정부(政府)의 정책입안자(政策立案者), 기업가(企業家) 및 근로자(勤勞者) 등 각(各) 경제주체(經濟主體)의 단합된 공동노력(共同努力)이 요구되는 것으로 지적되었다.

• Proceedings of the KIEE Conference
• /
• 2003.07a
• /
• pp.351-353
• /
• 2003

본 논문에서는 UPFC가 포함된 전력계통의 부하수준을 고려하여 각각의 수준에 적합한 계통 운용 목적을 달성하기 위한 UPFC 운전법을 제안하였다. 최적조류계산에 적용이 용이한 분리형 UPFC 수리 모형을 채택하여 부하수준이 낮은 경부하나 평균부하에서는 경제 우선으로 발전비용과 손실을 최소화하였고, 사고시 과부하, 모선 저전압 문제 둥이 발생할 가능성이 높은 중부하에서는 안전도 우선으로 안전도 지수를 최소화하였다. 본 논문에서 제안한 방법을 UPFC 3기가 설치된 6기 30모선 계통에 적용하여 경부하에서는 발전비용과 손실 최소화를 통하여 비용절감 효과를 정량적으로 나타내었다. 평균부하의 경우, 사고전에는 비용최소화를, 사고후에는 안전도지수를 최소화하였다. 중부하에서는 사고에 대비하여 UPFC 운전으로 안전도지수를 최소화하였다.

• Proceedings of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute Conference
• /
• 2011.04a
• /
• pp.22-25
• /
• 2011

본 연구에서는 경제성에 기반한 초고층건물 구조시스템의 대안평가 방안에 대하여 연구하였다. 초고층건물 구조시스템의 대안평가 항목은 크게 구조성능, 경제성, 공기의 세 가지로 나눌 수 있다. 일반적으로 구조성능은 주어진 기준의 만족여부로 평가하며, 최종적으로는 경제성이 평가에 결정적인 영향을 미치게 된다. 본 연구에서는 구조성능을 만족하는 대안에 대하여 공기를 비용으로 환산하고, 최종적으로는 물량에 의한 비용과 공기에서 환산된 비용을 합산하여 대안을 평가하는 방안을 제안하였다. 공기의 비용화는 공기의 비용연동지수를 구하고 이로부터 공기의 대체경제성비용을 산정하는 방법으로 고려하였다. 제안된 대안평가 과정은 수많은 대안을 짧은 시간에 평가할 수 있도록 전산시스템 구현가능성을 염두에 두고 구축하였다.

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies
• /
• v.43 no.2
• /
• pp.319-344
• /
• 2012

This study decomposed Concentration Index(CI) and Hiwv Index(HI) of medical care utilization by subgroups: sex, age group, and region. CI and HI were decomposed into "the between group" component, "within group" component, and a residual. The results of analysis are summarized as follows; First, there was no influence of sex on the equity of medical care utilization measured by the numbers of visiting clinic. However, "within group" component of female explained .0441 among HI, .1035. This means that poor women's underutilization of medical care is the important factor in determining its degree of equity. Second, age groups had a decisive effect on the equity of medical care utilization measured by the numbers of visiting clinic. they explained -.0085 among HI, -.0170. Third, internal equality within elderly group was the most important factor in determining HI measured by the medical care cost. Finally, "within group" component of urban area explained .0535 amomg HI, ,1035 measured by medical care cost. This indicated that the urban poor's underutilization of medical care was very important factor in explaining its degree of equity. There was the poor's underutilization of medical care within the groups as female, the elderly, and urban areas. This significantly explained the equity of medical care costs.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Marine Environment & Energy
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.107-113
• /
• 2011

To evaluate the performance of the hydrodynamic model, we introduced 10 skill assessments that are assorted by two groups: quantitative skill assessments (Absolute Average Error or AAE, Root Mean Squared Error or RMSE, Relative Absolute Average Error or RAAE, Percentage Model Error or PME) and qualitative skill assessments (Correlation Coefficient or CC, Reliability Index or RI, Index of Agreement or IA, Modeling Efficiency or MEF, Cost Function or CF, Coefficient of Residual Mass or CRM). These skill assessments were applied and calculated to evaluate the hydrodynamic modeling at one of Florida estuaries for water level, current, and salinity as comparing measured and simulated values. We found that AAE, RMSE, RAAE, CC, IA, MEF, CF, and CRM are suitable for the error assessment of water level and current, and AAE, RMSE, RAAE, PME, CC, RI, IA, CF, and CRM are good at the salinity error assessment. Quantitative and qualitative skill assessments showed the similar trend in terms of the classification for good and bad performance of model. Furthermore, this paper suggested the criteria of the "good" model performance for water level, current, and salinity. The criteria are RAAE < 10%, CC > 0.95, IA > 0.98, MEF > 0.93, CF < 0.21 for water level, RAAE < 20%, CC > 0.7, IA > 0.8, MEF > 0.5, CF < 0.5 for current, and RAAE < 10%, PME < 10%, CC > 0.9, RI < 1.15, CF < 0.1 for salinity.

• Proceedings of the KAIS Fall Conference
• /
• 2007.11a
• /
• pp.152-154
• /
• 2007

본 논문에서는 기존의 해석적인 수법에서 여러 신뢰도 지표가 주로 수용가의 수와 지형적인 영향만을 고려한 단점을 보완하기 위하여, 어느 특정지역의 수용가가 실제로 정전되는 경우를 상정하여 수용가의 정전비용을 계산하여, 이에 의한 영향을 신뢰도 지표 속에 나타내도록 하였다. 즉, 정전비용에 따른 수용가의 중요도를 고려하기 위하여, 수용가의 정전비용 특성을 이용한 새로운 신뢰도 평가지수를 정의하여, 양적인 면에서 뿐만 아니라 질적인 면에서도 가장 경제적으로 신뢰도를 향상시킬 수 있는 특정 계통이나 지역, 설비 등을 선택할 수 있는 새로운 신뢰도 평가수법을 제안하였다. 또한, 배전계통에 신재생에너지전원(이하 분산형전원)이 도입된 경우를 상정하여 상기의 신뢰도지수를 산정하는 수법을 제안하였으며, 사고구간을 줄이는 리클로우져와 섹셔널라이저의 동작을 포함한 배전계통의 보호협조 시스템도 고려한 신뢰도지수 산정법도 제안하였다.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.19 no.5
• /
• pp.3-9
• /
• 2018

Although Life Cycle Cost (LCC) must be evaluated by experts, sometimes it may not allow a sufficient time for even the experienced LCC expert to make rational decisions. Therefore, it often ends with relatively comparing the final numbers. We have broken down 110 technical proposals that are actually bade and accepted for large construction projects, and then have analyzed the uncertainty of Maintenance and Energy (M&E) cost during building life cycle, which turns out be the most volatile factor in uncertainty of LCC. Also we suggest "Value Engineering Index (VEI)" - the reduced M&E cost that is normalized by the reduced first cost. It is analyzed that the most uncertain factors of the M&E cost include repair and replacement term differing from each project, duplicated repair and replacement, non-standard repair items, and site-specific energy cost. Eventually we propose a VEI population with a mean of 1.38 and a standard deviation of 1.19, which is obtained by individually and exclusively applying the uncertain factors of the M&E cost to the 35 standard sample of technical proposals. The LCC evaluators may be able to use the VEI population as the benchmark to select the technical proposal with the most reasonable LCC among many others in two suggested manners; the one is to deterministically calculate the probability of single VEIs, and the other is to stochastically calculate the probability of the VEIs where uncertainty is quantified.