• Title/Summary/Keyword: 비교국가연구

Search Result 3,118, Processing Time 0.033 seconds

A Comparative Study on Unemployment Insurance, Social Assistance and ALMP in OECD Countries (실업안전망 국제비교연구: 실업보험, 사회부조, 적극적노동시장정책의 제도조합과 유형화)

  • Lee, Sophia Seung-yoon
    • 한국사회정책
    • /
    • v.25 no.1
    • /
    • pp.345-375
    • /
    • 2018
  • This study examines labour market and unemployment protection policies as a configuration in 12 OECD countries in order to investigate how countries from different regime conform to or diverse from previous welfare state regime discussion, and to examine its relationship with poverty and inequality. In analyzing the combination of the unemployment insurance, the unemployment assistance, and active labour market policy, firstly, fuzzy scores of unemployment insurance was calculated by analyzing the strictness of eligibility, duration of benefit and the generosity of income replacement rate. For unemployment assistance, the ratio of public assistance expenditure to the GDP in each country and the ratio of unemployment benefit level to the average wage in each country have been considered. As for the active labour market policy, the total expenditure per GDP of this policy was converted into fuzzy points and analyzed. As a result, 5 types in 2005 and 6 types in 2010 were generated. Specifically, 'assistance type(iAp)', 'insurance type (Iap)', 'comprehensive safety net type (IAP)', 'weak safety net type(iap)' were analyzed. This paper suggested policy implication for South Korean case, which consistently had high score for weak safety net type(iap).

Technology Standardization Efforts of Government for Emerging Industry: The Case of Cloud Computing in South Korea and US (신성장산업 활성화를 위한 국가 주도 기술 표준화 추진 방안 비교: 한국과 미국의 클라우드 컴퓨팅을 중심으로)

  • Kim, Hongbum;Shin, Jungwoo;Park, Kyung-Gook
    • Journal of Technology Innovation
    • /
    • v.23 no.3
    • /
    • pp.87-114
    • /
    • 2015
  • There are many government-led efforts for exploiting new growth engine to survive in a globally competitive environment. as a representative strategy, technology standardization policy is promoted by many countries. Although each country has unique characteristics in facilitating technology standardization, we can recently observe different strategy from conventional way like in United States. Thus, this study examines government-led technology standardization for activating emerging industry. Using case analysis, cloud computing is analyzed in terms of standardization organization and process perspectives, and technology standardization efforts by government in United States and Korea are compared. According to case analysis, this study investigates changes of the government-led standardization strategies for each country and suggests implications for activating emerging industry using technology standardization policy.

Water Management Financing in Korea and S. Africa (물관리 재정의 평가: 한국-남아공)

  • Park, Doo-Ho;Ryu, Mun-Hyun
    • Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
    • /
    • 2010.05a
    • /
    • pp.586-590
    • /
    • 2010
  • 정부가 생각하는 중요한 정책방향은 두 가지를 보면 알 수 있다. 바로 예산과 인력이다. 필요하다고 판단하는 곳에 정부는 예산과 인력이 투입되게 마련이다. 따라서 국가의 재정운용에 대한 평가를 해보면 어떤 것이 중요한 것인지에 대한 가치판단을 할 수 있다. 국가의 물관리 예산도 마찬가지이다. 국민소득과 여러 가지 사회경제적 특성에 따라 물관리예산은 국가별로 차이가 난다. 그러나 경제발전단계가 높을수록 높은 관리예산이 투입되는 것이 일반적이다. 과연 우리나라의 물관리예산은 적정한 것일까? 그러나 우리나라의 물관리는 여러 부처에 분산되어 있고 하천의 관리도 국가하천과 지방하천으로 구분되어 있기 때문에 이 질문에 답을 하기가 어렵다. 엄밀히 말하면 우리나라의 물관리예산이 연간 모두 얼마인지를 정확히 알지 못한다. 결국 적정한 수준인지를 평가할 수도 없다. 홍수방어와 용수공급이라는 시급성으로 인해 공공투자의 성격이 강했기 때문에 굳이 평가가 필요 없었을 수도 있다. 그러나 물관리가 과거와는 달리 복잡해졌고 따라서 물관리를 위한 정부의 재정계획과 집행 역시 여기에 맞게 보다 세심해져야 한다. 이제까지의 물관리예산이 사회적인 인프라를 건설하는데 주력했었다면 이제는 거버넌스와 생태계관리는 물론 물순환 전체를 위한 다양한 정책에 국가 재정이 투입될 필요가 있다. 그러나 이 같은 의사결정은 현재 재정계획과 투입입의 적정성과 타당성이 먼저 평가되어야 한다. 본 연구는 OECD내 다른 국가들의 물관리예산과 우리나라의 물관리예산을 비교분석함으로써 우리나라 물관리예산의 적정성을 평가하고자 한다. 특히 합리적인 재정구조를 가지고 있다고 판단되는 남아프리카공화국과의 비교를 통해 향후 우리나라의 과제가 무엇인지 검토하고자 한다.

  • PDF

Characteristics of Input and Output of Scientific Research (국가별 과학연구 투입과 성과의 특성분석)

  • Park, Hyun-Woo;Kim, Kyung-Ho;Yeo, Woon-Dong
    • Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
    • /
    • v.12 no.3
    • /
    • pp.471-498
    • /
    • 2009
  • The ability to judge a country's scientific standing is vital for the governments and businesses that must decide scientific priorities and funding. In this paper, we analyze the output and outcomes from research investment over the recent years, to measure the quality of scientific research on national scales and to set it in an international context. There are many ways to evaluate the quality of scientific research, but few have proved satisfactory. To measure the quantity and quality of science in different nations, we analyzed the numbers of published research papers and their citations. The number of citations per paper is a useful measure of the impact of a nation's research output. Essential at a were acquired from SCI database by Thomson Scientific, which indexes more than 8,000 journals, representing most significant materials in science and engineering. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate and compare the output and outcomes among nations in a variety of viewpoints and criteria. One of the implications in response to the result of analysis is that sustainable economic development in highly competitive world markets requires a direct engagement in the generation of knowledge. Even modest improvement in healthcare, clean water, sanitation, food, and transport need capabilities in engineering, technology, and medicine beyond many countries' reach. Nations exporting natural resources such as gold and oil can import technology and expertise, but only until these resources are exhausted. For them, sustainability should imply investment in alternative agricultural and technological capabilities through improvements in their skills base. A strong science base does not necessarily leat to wealth generation. However, strength in science has additional benefits for individual nations, and for the world as a whole.

  • PDF

한중일 침해사고 대응체계 비교에 관한 연구 - 사이버보안 법규, 대응기관, 대응절차를 중심으로

  • Kim, Hee Yeon
    • Review of KIISC
    • /
    • v.25 no.2
    • /
    • pp.43-57
    • /
    • 2015
  • 국경을 넘나드는 사이버공격에 대한 효과적인 사이버보안 정책 수립을 위한 국가간 협력이 절실하다. 본 논문에서는 우리나라와 지리적으로 맞닿아 있는 중국 및 일본과 우리나라의 침해사고 대응 관련 법, 대응기관, 대응절차 등 국가별 침해사고 대응체계를 비교하고 효과적인 침해사고 대응체계 구축을 위한 초석을 마련하고자 한다. 우리나라 사이버보안 관련 법의 체계성에 중국 및 일본의 사이버보안 관련 정책의 유연성을 접합하고, 사이버보안 컨트롤타워를 성문화함으로써 인터넷 침해사고 대응의 효율성을 높일 수 있을 것이다.

Utilization of ICT in Higher Education within ASEAN Countries (아세안 국가 고등교육에 있어서의 ICT 활용 분석)

  • Ko, Jang-Wan;Kim, Eun-Jin
    • Korean Journal of Comparative Education
    • /
    • v.28 no.2
    • /
    • pp.123-151
    • /
    • 2018
  • The purposes of this study were to examine the current status of ICT in all ASEAN countries and to provide implications for Korea to find appropriate ways to support and collaborate with HEIs in ASEAN countries. To achieve these purposes, ASEAN countries were categorized into 3 groups based on the development stages of ICT, and the key ICT initiatives, current facts about ICT, and related issues were analyzed. The results of the study were as follows: Group 1 countries, Brunei, Malaysia, and Singapore, with relatively well-established ICT infrastructure, have established their own ICT policies and initiated e-learning programs. Group 2 countries, Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam, which have relatively well-developed ICT infrastructure with existing regional gaps, showed different uses of ICT in higher education. Philippines and Thailand established their own policies based on national ICT master plans while Indonesia focused on MOOCs and Vietnam initiated cyber university projects. Group 3 countries, Cambodia, Lao PDR, and Myanmar, with the least developed ICT infrastructure in ASEAN, have also tried to develop national level strategies to utilize ICT in higher education. However, insufficient and inadequate ICT infrastructure created issues and challenges for these countries to successfully initiate ICT policies. This study suggested that it is necessary to take into serious consideration the national differences when collaborating with and supporting ASEAN countries due to the variation of ICT development stages and different levels of using ICT in higher education among ASEAN countries.

Comparison of policy perceptions between national R&D projects and standing committees using topic modeling analysis : focusing on the ICT field (토픽모델링 분석을 활용한 국가연구개발사업과제와 국회 상임위원회 사이의 정책 인식 비교 : ICT 분야를 중심으로)

  • Song, Byoungki;Kim, Sangung
    • Journal of Industrial Convergence
    • /
    • v.20 no.7
    • /
    • pp.1-11
    • /
    • 2022
  • In this paper, numerical values are derived using topic modeling among data-based evaluation methodologies discussed by various research institutes. In addition, we will focus on the ICT field to see if there is a difference in policy perception between the national R&D project and standing committee. First, we create model for classifying ICT documents by learning R&D project data using HAN model. And we perform LDA topic modeling analysis on ICT documents classified by applying the model, compare the distribution with the topics derived from the R&D project data and proceedings of standing committees. Specifically, a total of 26 topics were derived. Also, R&D project data had professionally topics, and the standing committee-discuss relatively social and popular issues. As the difference in perception can be numerically confirmed, it can be used as a basic study on indicators that can be used for future policy or project evaluation.

A Comparative Study on Welfare Regimes and Welfare Attitudes : Focusing on Satisfaction and Needs of the Role of Government for Inequality Reduction (복지체제와 복지태도의 국제비교 연구 : 불평등 완화에 대한 국가역할 만족도와 요구도를 중심으로)

  • Jung, Yun-Tae
    • Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies
    • /
    • v.49 no.2
    • /
    • pp.211-232
    • /
    • 2018
  • The purpose of this study is to verify whether the types of welfare attitudes are classified according to the welfare regimes. Specifically, this study tried to confirm whether the satisfaction and needs of the role of government for inequality reduction are divided into welfare regimes. For the purpose, this study conducted a comparative analysis of 24 European countries using the 6th European Social Survey (2012) and the Eurostat data. The main results of the analysis are summarized as follows. First, there is a difference in the satisfaction and needs of the role of government for the inequality reduction among the welfare regimes. Generally, the satisfaction is high in the Nordic countries, while the needs is high in the southern and eastern European countries. Second, there is a correlation that the country where the per capita welfare expenditure level is high and the redistribution effect is strong have high level of the satisfaction. Third, the types of welfare attitudes are classified according to the welfare regimes. In particular, the Nordic countries are converging into a cluster with low needs and high satisfaction. These countries have high level of social spending and strong redistributive effects. This study suggested policy implications based on the above results.