• Proceedings of the Korean Institute Of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• autumn
• /
• pp.329-332
• /
• 2001

Alternative dispute resolution(ADR) techniques, like negotiation, arbitration, meditation, have been used to resolve dispute in Korea construction industry with litigation. Nowadays, in construction, there are growing numbers of disputing cases, because of the different viewpoint of the owner and the constructor, great demand of opening market, and bad construction business situation. As the name implies, ADR plays an important roles after disputes have already arisen. This paper suggests the one of the solutions that prevents disputes befor they have been occurred. There are some proves that the partnering has a substantial effect on reducing disputes and time reduction and improving communication among the parties. This paper proposes the partnering model for the one of preventive methods to solve disputes.

• The Korean Society of Law and Medicine
• /
• v.17 no.1
• /
• pp.169-208
• /
• 2016

"Act on Remedies for Injuries from Medical Malpractive and Mediation of Medical Disputes)" has been enacted to solve medical dispute. In addition, mediation and arbitration procedures have started since April 8th, 2012 from the Establishment of Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency. The average initiation rate of mediation for the past three years turned out to be 43%. Hereupon, Establishment of Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency has created a solution for automatic initiation if relevant to particular conditions to improve initiation rate of mediation procedures and passed it through the Assembly plenary session in May, 2016 and promulgated on the 30th of the same month. However, even if mediation procedure initiation rate is increased, there is no guarantee for mediation establishment rate to be improved according to current law. If Establishment of Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency intends to increase aforementioned value, automatic initiation is not the only solution. Instead, it seems to be a major assignment to identify fundamental reasons for why major health care facilities have not participated in it and to restore reliability on them. In addition, among crimes specified on the Article 268 of Criminal Act in the Article $51^*$ of "Act on Remedies for Injuries from Medical Malpractive and Mediation of Medical Disputes)", revision must be made so that the clause of clue and death by occupational or gross negligence is applied. Furthremore, it is suggested to supplement previously insufficient policies with the operation so that mediation procedures created by Establishment of Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency are stably settled in the perspective of medical institutions including the establishment of new conditions for medical institutions founders or health and medical service personnel to claim the proxy payment for damage.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2008.05a
• /
• pp.1530-1535
• /
• 2008

수자원과 관련된 많은 분쟁 및 갈등들은 국내뿐만 아니라 전 세계적으로 발생하고 있다. 따라서 분쟁 및 갈등해결을 위한 많은 연구들이 진행되고 있지만 수자원과 관련된 분쟁들은 대부분 원활한 해결을 이루지 못하고 있으며, 특히 국내의 경우에는 더욱 심각하다 할 수 있다. 따라서 제한된 자원인 수자원을 둘러싸고 수자원분쟁이 일어나는 것은 당연한 일이라 할 수 있으며, 분쟁의 양상도 다양하다. 댐 건설로 인한 상류지역과 하류지역의 갈등, 수로의 건설로 인해 수자원을 빼앗기는 지역과 수자원을 얻게 되는 지역 간의 갈등, 새로운 공단이나 개발로 인하여 하류지역에서 수질악화를 우려하여 반대하는 경우 등 여러 종류의 수자원으로 인한 분쟁이 있다. 수자원을 둘러싼 갈등이 쉽게 해결이 되지 않고, 또한 갈등 및 분쟁이 쉽게 발생되는 이유도 주체자들간 입장 차이에서 오는 성격이라 할 수 있겠다. 수자원과 관련된 분쟁에서 오는 여러 가지 갈등들은 사회적으로 많은 문제들을 발생시켜 수자원의 원활한 공급이 저해될 수 있다. 이로 인해 사회적으로 수자원과 관련된 분쟁 해결에 들어가는 많은 시간과 노력, 비용을 생각해 볼 때, 효과적인 갈등 및 분쟁의 해결은 국가적 발전에 있어서 영향을 줄 수 있다. 그러므로 갈등 및 분쟁의 원활한 해결이 국가적 발전에 많은 비중을 차지 한다고 할 수 있다는 것은 이런 이유들 때문이라 할 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 국내 수자원과 관련된 분쟁사례들을 하천의 기능에 따른 분류, 발생 원인에 따른 분류, 분쟁주체에 따른 분류 등을 유형별로 구분하여 수자원분쟁의 여러 가지 사례들을 조사하였다. 또한 분쟁 및 갈등을 해결하기 위한 방안으로 거버넌스 시스템을 적용하였고 분쟁의 원활한 합의 조정방안 및 문제점을 제시하기 위한 외국의 시민참여 모델을 특징 및 특성을 분석하였다. 또한, 공영시각모형, 게임이론, 제도설계이론의 공학적 모형을 바탕으로 물분쟁의 해결을 위한 대안을 모색할 수 있는 과학적 접근 방안을 제시하여 향후 여러 가지형태의 국책사업 시행 시 발생 할 수 있는 분쟁의 해결 및 조정을 위한 방안으로 활용할 수 있는 토대를 마련하고자 한다.

• The Korean Society of Law and Medicine
• /
• v.16 no.1
• /
• pp.255-288
• /
• 2015

It is desirable to prevent medical accidents because they bring about irretrievable outcomes to patients, as they are directly related to each patient's life, and health. However, once medical accidents occur, it is appropriate to resolve them quickly without conflict before the feelings of directly involved people are intensely confronted with each other. Korea Consumer Agency carries out medical dispute mediation to address such disputes quickly, fairly, and efficiently, and so does Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency. Although there has been constant debate on a merge between the two agencies because of duplicated work and consequent inefficiency, it is desirable to maintain the two agencies to ensure consumers' options and to promote the mutual development of the agencies through competition. Therefore, there should be legal and systematical support for Korea Consumer Agency to have fair competition with Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency. This is not for Korea Consumer Agency, but ultimately for consumers.

• Transportation Technology and Policy
• /
• v.8 no.2
• /
• pp.15-24
• /
• 2011

• Bulletin of Korea Environmental Preservation Association
• /
• v.16 no.9
• /
• pp.28-33
• /
• 1994

• The Korean Society of Law and Medicine
• /
• v.5 no.2
• /
• pp.391-412
• /
• 2004

• Bulletin of Korea Environmental Preservation Association
• /
• s.412
• /
• pp.49-52
• /
• 2014

• Bulletin of Korea Environmental Preservation Association
• /
• s.406
• /
• pp.50-53
• /
• 2013

• Journal of Arbitration Studies
• /
• v.19 no.2
• /
• pp.73-94
• /
• 2009

There are significant differences between disputes among enterprises and disputes between consumers and an enterprise. A majority of consumers may suffer from the same damages at the same time with small amount concerned and sometimes low chances for find the real cause. Among these distinctive features, the most significant characteristic in consumer-business disputes can be found in that consumers are in a disadvantageous position compared to businesses. When it comes to consumer policy, the biggest aim lies with turning back the damage a consumer is suffering into normalcy. In this regard, the Consumer Dispute Resolution System is the most essential among consumer policies. In Korea, the Collective Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) System was introduced to the Consumer Dispute Resolution System in 2007 in line with revision on the Consumer Basic Law. However, smooth damage redress for consumers is still not taking place. Against this backdrop, this report suggests that 'consumer arbitration' program should be introduced to the Consumer Dispute Resolution System as part of making good and smooth progress for consumer damage redress.