• Journal of Arbitration Studies
• /
• v.19 no.3
• /
• pp.199-217
• /
• 2009

During the urbanization progresses, apartments such as the house of commons, representing our homes are situated in space. However, many consumer problems of our country's apartment house are caused by the government's failure of housing policy and consumer dispute resolution system In this study, apartment house and alleviate consumer disputes relating to in proactive ways to improve the government's housing policy was presented. At the same time, since the revision of Consumer Fundamental Act on collective alternative dispute resolution system has proposed scheme, this occurred after a dispute to resolve the dispute can be more efficient ways.

• KDI Journal of Economic Policy
• /
• v.16 no.4
• /
• pp.141-167
• /
• 1994

본 연구는 현행 우리나라 노사관계(勞使關係)의 특정을 분석한 후, 미(美) 일(日) 등 선진국가의 노사관계(勞使關係) 경험으로부터 시사점을 도출하여 경제적(經濟的) 합리성(合理性)에 기초한 합리적(合理的) 노사관계(勞使關係)를 정립하기 위한 기본방향(基本方向)과 제도개선방안(制度改善方案)을 제시하였다. 첫째, 파업비용(罷業費用)이 작아 노동조합의 힘이 과도하게 커졌던 교섭력(交涉力)의 부균형(不均衡) 구조(構造)를 개선해야 한다. 반면에 한계근로자(限界勤勞者)는 주로 근로기준법(勤勞基準法)에 의해 보호를 받고 있으므로 법정근로기준(法定勤勞基準)을 일률적(一律的)으로 하향조정(下向調整)하는 것은 바람직하지 않다. 둘째, '종업원만족(從業員滿足)을 통한 고객만족(顧客滿足)', '정보공유(情報共有)를 통한 파업예방(罷業豫防)'을 위해 노사협의회(勞使協議會)의 기능을 강화(强化)하여 근로자(勤勞者) 경영참여(經營參與)를 확대(擴大)해야 한다. 셋째 유연(柔軟)한 인력관리(人力管理)를 위해 고용관계(雇傭關係)의 경직성을 초래하는 법 제도를 개선해야 한다. 유연한 고용조정을 위한 정리해고규제(整理解雇規制) 완화(緩和), 다양한 근로관계의 형성에 유연하게 대응하기 위한 고용결약(雇傭契約)의 자유화(自由化) 확대(擴大)등이 이루어져야 할 것이다. 넷째, 노사분쟁(勞使紛爭)의 소지가 많아지고 파업(罷業)의 경제적(經濟的) 비용(費用)이 크게 증대될 것이므로 노사분쟁처리의 공정성(公正性)을 제고하기 위해 중재위원(仲裁委員) 선정방법(選定方法) 개선(改善) 등의 제도개선이 있어야 한다.

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• no.9 s.194
• /
• pp.59-63
• /
• 2006

시공을 하다가 손해를 보았는데도 발주자 혹은 원도급업체에서 인정을 안해준다면 어떻게 해야 할까? "소송을 할까?", "다음 공사는 어떻게 해. 그냥 손해보고 말지 뭐", "아니야 그냥 넘어가기에는 너무 억울해" 설비건설업을 하다보면 누구나 한번쯤 이런 경험이 있었을 것이다. 이럴 경우 공정거래위원회에 문의 하거나 건설하도급분쟁조정협의회에 문의하다가 정 안될 경우 소송에 돌입한다. 소송의 경우 대법원의 최종 판결이 나기까지 2~3년은 고스란히 걸림은 물론 소송비용도 만만치 않다. 이렇게 기간이 길지 않고 가격도 저렴하면서 해결 가능한 방법은 없을까? 물론 있다. 공정거래위원회에 제소하면 된다. 공정거래위원회는 국무총리 소속의 장관급 중앙행정기관이자 합의제 준사법기관으로서 경쟁정책을 수립 · 운영하며 공정거래관련 사건을 심결 · 처리하는 역할을 하고 있다. 정부는 지난 84년 하도급자보호 및 소비자의 보호를 위해 「하도급거래공정화에 관한 법률 」과 「약관의규제에 관한 법률」을 84년과 86년에 각각 제정함으로써 상대적으로 약자인 하도급자도 법의 보호를 받게 되었다. 본지는 지난 7월호 대한상사중재원의 '중재제도'에 이어 이번 8월호에서는 건설하도급분쟁조정협의회를 게재했고, 이번호에는 공정거래위원회에 대하여 게재한다.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.65-73
• /
• 2018

Since unfair trading practices between participants in construction project are common, the government has enforced several policies and systems to prevent or minimize the unfair trading practices in construction industry. However, not much attention has been paid to figure out which policies or acts are working or not. This paper analyzed the effectiveness of the policies and acts which are being implemented to prevent unfair trading practices and provided several suggestions to improve the performance of those acts. Survey was conducted to industry experts to collect data regarding their perceptions on those policies and acts. Then the effectiveness of the policies and acts were analyzed in terms of their importance and performance through IPA (Importance-Performance Analysis) based on the survey result. It was found through IPA that execution related acts such as investigation, exposure, and punishment for unfair trading practice have shown low effectiveness in entire construction process and dispute arbitration and mediation related center operated by authority showed low performance too. To improve the effectiveness of those acts, dispute arbitration system improvement, investigation & reporting system consolidation and enhancement practical binding force of punishment and penalty were suggested. Most of all, rules and culture for fair trading should become more established in construction industry by preventing conflict among participants through active communication.

• Journal of Arbitration Studies
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.67-98
• /
• 2009

Recently there are many cases on the intellectual property dispute. Among them some cases are solved through mediation and arbitration. Mediation and arbitration hold some advantage over court proceeding for intellectual property dispute. However the traditional litigation system has material limitation to settle down international intellectual property dispute. Without arbitration, litigation in court would be the only choice in case of no consensual settlement between the disputing parties. However, once being aware of the usefulness of the arbitration, people in international business widely realize that arbitration is generally preferred to litigation. Mediation is a method of settling dispute outside of court setting and many mediation committee are established since 1986 in Korea. Arbitrability has been a crucial issue in the intellectual property dispute. In most developed countries including the U.S.A. and Switzerland, arbitrability in the intellectual property dispute has been changed in recent years by law. Now in resolving the dispute with international intellectual property is needed for legal research, experience, working practices and knowledge of the intellectual property industry and so on.

• Digital Contents
• /
• no.12 s.127
• /
• pp.128-131
• /
• 2003

10대 차세대 신성장동력 가운데 하나로 지정된 디지털콘텐츠 산업의 육성을 위해 지난해 7월부터 시행된‘온라인디지털콘텐츠산업발전법’의 개정안이 마련됐다. 국회 과학기술정보통신위원회 이종걸 의원(민주당)은 지난 10월 16일 디지털콘텐츠진흥지역 지정, 수요 예보제 도입, 분쟁조정제도 신설 등의 내용을 담은‘온라인디지털콘텐츠산업발전법중개정 법률안’을 발의했다. 이번에 발의된 개정안은 디지털콘텐츠 시장의 활성화를 도모하는 한편, 디지털콘텐츠 제작자에 대한 보호를 통해 산업 육성 기반 조성 및 국제 경쟁력을 강화하기 위한 것으로 약 18가지 조항이 신설 또는 개정된다. 개정안의 주요내용을 정리했다.

• Journal of Arbitration Studies
• /
• v.15 no.2
• /
• pp.163-196
• /
• 2005

In modern society, there is given rise to a lots of environmental controversies. This disputes bring about the social problems. The reason that this kinds of dispute is frequently brought in our society is that our society is democratized and a nation asserts his rights strongly. And also the reason is that there is not enough the legal system which is able to settle such a dispute amicably. Thus this thesis deals with the arbitration systems as the way to solve the dispute of environmental problems. This paper is composed as follows. 1. Introduction 2. The cause of trouble still exists in our society related to environmental controversy 3. A general settlement procedure of environmental disputes 4. Administrative grievance mediation 5. Environmental disputes and arbitration systems 6. Conclusion

• 대한예방의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2000.10a
• /
• pp.195-196
• /
• 2000

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.17 no.7
• /
• pp.487-497
• /
• 2017

South Korea needs reorganization of dispute resolution system due to the frequent occurrence of a case that trade secret or technique are leaked. First, the distributed various laws are established and enforced by enacting and enforcing individual laws. Therefore, the redundancy problems, the collision of individual laws, the decline in diversity, integrity, and connectivity are issues. An independent legal system is needed by Act on the Prevention and Protection of Technology Leakage. Thereby, The support system of technological protection that is sprayed in government departments such as the Small and Medium Business Administration, the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, the Patent Office, the Fair Trade Commission, the Trade Committee, the National Police Agency, and the Spy Agency integrates and unifies institutionally, and it is necessary to advance a policy with functional division. Second, the Patent Tribunal, the Invention Promotion Act, the Industrial Property Right Dispute Mediation Committee by the patent law, the Industrial Technical Dispute Mediation Committee on the Industrial Technology Outflow Prevention and Protection Law and the Medium and Small Firm Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Committee on Small Business Technology Protection Support Law are installed. However, since it established the integrated law on the Act on the Prevention and Protection of Technology Leakage, it is desirable to set the merged operation of establishment on the Technical Dispute Mediation Committee under the Small and Medium Business Administration or the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy.

• International Commerce and Information Review
• /
• v.19 no.2
• /
• pp.169-190
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this article by looking into the international commercial arbitration system of China is to provide solutions regarding commercial disputes that may occur in trade between China and Korea. For the research, literature review based on the Chinese Arbitration Law and CIETAC Arbitration Rules was employed. According to the research, the arbitration system of China applies partially differentiated legislation between domestic and international arbitration rules, unaccepting any ad-hoc arbitration, a limitation to the party autonomy, a deficiency of independence given to the arbitral institution, the participation of jurisdiction on arbitration is severe and it brings hardships in the execution of arbitral award. Beside these, in China's arbitral institution the jurisdiction directly progresses adjustments during the arbitration procedure and the following result is written as the award. Thus, the research is expected to provide legal and practical solutions to the commercial dispute with Chinese companies by looking into the main contents of legislations of the international commercial arbitration system in China.