• Land and Housing Review
• /
• v.6 no.2
• /
• pp.49-60
• /
• 2015

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un decided to open 19 Economic Development Zones which are located in all over the country, as a new economic development strategy. The strategy is estimated for accepting change from socialistic planning economic system into socialistic market economic system gradually. South Korean government is busy preparing for reunification between South and North Korea. Recently, many forums and seminars for the issue, 'reunification' are held by public side as well as private sector. This study is focused on making practical strategy for developing 13 Economic Development Zones which were established in 2013 in concurrence with South and North Korea. The study assessed investment potential of the 13 zones in terms of locational, economic and legal competency from the investor's perspective of south koreans. 5 E.D.Zs, Songrim, Hyungdong, Heungnam, Chungjin, Waudo were chosen to be developed on the preferential basis. Development cooperation between South and North Korea on the 13 E.D.Zs will increase the income of north koreans in rural areas by creating jobs, contribute to boost North Korea's economic growth, and bring forward economic integration between South and North Korea.

• 한국신재생에너지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2007.11a
• /
• pp.687-689
• /
• 2007

점차 심화되고 있는 북한의 에너지 위기는 북한 사회이 경제적 측면뿐만 아니라 사회 및 정치, 나아가서는 국제 사회에서의 북한의 외교정책에까지 영향을 미치는 것은 물론 남한의 군사적, 정치적 위협 요인이 되고 있다. 북한의 에너지난 타개를 위해 여러 회담의 주요 사안으로 에너지 지원을 요구하고 있으며, 내부적으로는 에너지 공급 제한 등의 정책을 시행하고 있으나 이는 미봉책에 불과하다. KEDO 중단으로 북한의 장기적 에너지 지원 노력이 중단되었으며, 중유 지원 등의 방식은 일시적인 수준에서 그치게 될 것 이다. 본 연구에서는 북한의 에너지난을 타개하고 이를 통하여 사회 경제 전반의 안정화에 기여할 수 있는 대북 에너지 지원 방안을 모색하고자 한다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2013.10a
• /
• pp.301-305
• /
• 2013

북한은 김정은 체제의 조기 안착과 장기적 안정성 확보를 위해 경제난을 해결하고자 개혁 개방정책으로 변화 시도가 기대됨에 따라 북한이 개혁 개방정책을 시도할 경우 해운항만의 개방에 맞춰 북한의 해상 교역에 필요한 항행 안전시설에 대한 현황과 문제점을 짚어보고 우리나라의 역할과 지원방안에 대한 검토.

• International Area Studies Review
• /
• v.22 no.2
• /
• pp.163-186
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study is to analyze the institutional conditions and problems for the transition to the North Korean economic system. As a research method, we first analyzed the legislative processes of 4th stage market reform policies (liberalization, privatization, privatization, and corporation) by major economic transition countries. And we found out the difference with North Korea. Based on this, it analyzed the process of institutionalization of North Korea's 4th stage economic reform policies (7.1 measures, comprehensive market policies, Currency reform, 6.28 policy). According to research, There are three important conditions that can not compare the changes of the North Korean market economy with those of the transition economies. First, the internal and external conditions and environment for the transition of the economic system and the role of the state and civil society are very different. Second, the means and objectives of the policy decision process and the implementation process are different. Third, it differs absolutely in terms of the nature and effectiveness of the nation's political and economic policies. Fourth, the priority, contents, and legislation process of economic policies for economic reform differ considerably from those of North Korea. Especially, when discussing the possibility of transition to the 'Chinese model', it is accompanied a considerable risk. It is because the purpose of market entry of control power in North Korea and their survival network are quite unique. In addition, China's domestic market size, population size, and type of control are quite different from North Korea. A necessary and sufficient condition for the transition of the North Korean economic system is the relaxation of physical control mechanisms and institutions in the market area. Next, it is necessary to make a legitimate institutionalization as well as an entire survey on the illegal ownership market. Based on this, it is necessary to gradually change the dependence of the domestic market on China to South Korea. In other words, this is a paradigm shift in the semi-controlled power exclusion, post-automation and domestic market.

• KDI Journal of Economic Policy
• /
• v.9 no.1
• /
• pp.129-133
• /
• 1987

• KDI북한경제리뷰
• /
• v.23 no.12
• /
• pp.101-105
• /
• 2021

• KDI북한경제리뷰
• /
• v.23 no.8
• /
• pp.40-44
• /
• 2021

• KDI북한경제리뷰
• /
• v.21 no.3
• /
• pp.81-85
• /
• 2019

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.2 no.17 s.17
• /
• pp.3-6
• /
• 1992

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.13 no.3 s.141
• /
• pp.2-12
• /
• 2003