• Journal of Arbitration Studies
• /
• v.13 no.2
• /
• pp.657-682
• /
• 2004

The method of finding the laws in the common law countries is significantly different from that in French civil code countries. The former usually derives the laws from the previous court decisions and applies the derived rules to the current case, called inductive, while the latter prescribes the laws beforehand and then applies the prescribed rule to the current case, called deductive. Such dichotomy in comparative legal research seems to be most recognizable and common. Accordingly, the mainstream of comparative legal research would come from comparison of common laws with civil codes. (omitted)

• 발명특허
• /
• v.24 no.8 s.281
• /
• pp.28-33
• /
• 1999

• 발명특허
• /
• v.24 no.10 s.283
• /
• pp.42-47
• /
• 1999

• 발명특허
• /
• v.24 no.9 s.282
• /
• pp.40-45
• /
• 1999

• Journal of Korea Game Society
• /
• v.18 no.1
• /
• pp.63-72
• /
• 2018

Legal issues whether augmented reality(AR) game service companies are responsible for damages that their game users cause to the community and residents are occurring these days. These kind of damages affect not only game users but also third parties who do not play the AR game. This paper explores the recent cases and analyze the type of legal issues such as trespass, nuisance and unjust enrichment. To determine the necessity of regulating the AR game company, constitutional balancing test, causation, specificity and persistence of the damage and other various standards should be applied.

• Journal of Korea Fair Competition Federation
• /
• no.96
• /
• pp.2-7
• /
• 2003

실익이 없는 무리한 강제 조사권의 도입보다는 혐의가 드러난 담합의 경우 직접 검찰에 고발하거나 내부밀고자 보호 및 보상 강화를 통하여 절차적 정당성 및 정책 실효성을 동시에 확보할 필요가 있다. 각 국의 경쟁당국이 압수$\cdot$수색권을 행사하여 부당한 공동행위를 적발한 경우는 극히 일부분이기 때문이다. 그리고, 유사사례에 대해 향후 엄격하게 공정거래법을 집행함으로써 부당한 공동행위에 대한 사전적인 억제력을 제고해야 한다. 한편으로는 공정위의 시정조치가 있기 전에도 부당한 공동행위의 결과 피해를 본 사적 당사자가 법원에 직접 손해배상을 청구할 수 있도록 하고, 전문가들을 활용하여 담합으로 인한 손해발생 입증과 손해배상액을 추정하여 부당이득을 환수할 수 있어야 한다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
• /
• 2018.07a
• /
• pp.110-111
• /
• 2018

모바일 게임 시장의 성장과 함께 보안 위협도 함께 증가하고 있는 것이 현재 상황이다. 게임 앱을 해킹하여 결제를 우회한 뒤 금전적 이익을 가로채거나, 원작 게임의 복제 앱을 만들어 부당이득을 취하는 일이 빈번하게 발생하고 있다. 본 논문에서는 모바일 게임 보안을 위하여 위협 인텔리전스와 같은 기술을 기반으로 모바일 게임에서 악용되고 있는 단순한 공격 유형들을 대상으로 사전에 수집 분석하여 지능형 공격을 차단할 수 있는 방안을 제시한다.

• The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
• /
• v.35 no.1
• /
• pp.63-101
• /
• 2020

'Flight safety zone' means a zone that the Minister of National Defense designates under Articles 4 and 6 of the Protection of Military Bases and Installations Act (hereinafter 'PMBIA') for the safety of flight during takeoff and landing of military aircrafts. The purpose of flight safety zone is to contribute to the national security by providing necessary measures for the protection of military bases and installations and smooth conduct of military operations. In this case, when the state set and used the flight safety zone, the landowner claimed restitution of unjust enrichment against the country. This article is an analysis based on the existing legal theory regarding the legitimacy of plaintiff's claim, and the summary of the discussion is as follows. A person who without any legal ground derives a benefit from the property or services of another and thereby causes loss to the latter shall be bound to return such benefit (Article 741 of the Civil Act). Since the subject matter is an infringing profit, the defendant must prove that he has a legitimate right to retain the profit. The State reserves the right to use over the land designated as a flight safety zone in accordance with legitimate procedures established by the PMBIA for the safe takeoff and landing of military aircrafts. Therefore, it cannot be said that the State gained an unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent over the land without legal cause. Expropriation, use or restriction of private property from public necessity and compensation therefor shall be governed by Act: provided, that in such a case, just compensation shall be paid (Article 23 (1) of the Constitution of The Republic of KOREA). Since there is not any provision in the PMBIA for loss compensation for the case where a flight safety zone is set over land as in this case, next question would be whether or not it is unconstitutional. Even if it is designated as a flight safety zone and the use and profits of the land are limited, the justification of the purpose of the flight safety zone system, the appropriateness of the means, the minimization of infringement, and the balance of legal interests are still recognized; thus just not having any loss compensation clause does not make the act unconstitutional. In conclusion, plaintiff's claim for loss compensation based on the 'Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for land, etc. for Public Works Projects', which has no provision for loss compensation due to public limits, is unjust.

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.126
• /
• pp.213-233
• /
• 2013

The aim of this paper is to reveal the ethical problem of insider trading. 'Insider trading' refer to obtaining information from non-public sources such as private acquaintances about trade secret, using it purposes of enhancing insider's financial advantages. And sometimes such a practice can be conducted fraudulently. Therefore, the focus of this paper will be on fairness or justice arguments against insider trading. And all kinds of discussion this paper are to focus the underlying consideration behind these arguments, that is, the underlying consideration about violation of ethical standards of fairness. First, one of these arguments argues that insider trading does necessarily involve defrauding general investors such as general employees, general stockholders. And economic power and unjust advantage of insider can be exercised to the detriment of this non-insider's interests. Second, another argument argues that insider trading undermines competition which is the principle of any free market. And insider trading is not only a complication in the free market mechanism, but also thwarts free competition which free markets depend. Third, the final argument argues that insider trading will be made something unfair about the concept of equal access to information. This argument argues, therefore, that to permit insider trading would be to set up stock market trading rules that are unfair to non-insiders.

• Review of KIISC
• /
• v.26 no.2
• /
• pp.25-30
• /
• 2016

비트코인(Bitcoin)은 P2P 네트워크상에 존재하는 실물 없는 화폐이다. 비트코인의 특징은 발행 기관의 통제가 없는 분산 구조를 형성하고 네트워크가 연결된 곳 어디에서나 거래가 이루어질 수 있도록 신뢰성을 부여하고 있다는 것이다. 이러한 특징의 비트코인은 최초 등장 이래 하루 평균 약 21만 건, 1억 7천만 달러가 거래되는 규모로 성장했다. 화폐로서의 가치가 증가함에 따라 부당 이득을 취하려는 위협 또한 증가하게 될 것이다. 대표적으로 비트코인을 위협하는 행위로는 이중 지불, 부정 인출 등을 그 사례로 볼 수 있다. 하지만 아직까지 성장 단계에 있는 비트코인을 대상으로 발생될 수 있는 위협에 대한 인지는 부족한 실정이다. 이에 본 논문에서는 비트코인 신뢰 구조를 살펴보고 이를 기반으로 발생할 수 있는 다양한 위협들을 분석하고 대응방향을 제시하고자 한다.