• 한국사회복지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 1994.11a
• /
• pp.253-263
• /
• 1994

• 한국사회복지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2006.04a
• /
• pp.131-135
• /
• 2006

• Social Workers
• /
• no.5 s.49
• /
• pp.48-49
• /
• 2006

• Journal of the Korean Academy of Esthetic Dentistry
• /
• v.28 no.2
• /
• pp.116-126
• /
• 2019

Objectives: Currently, oral health of the disabled is taken care of by the social workers, not by dental hygienists, who are the oral health professional in this area. Therefore, we aim to enhance the equity of oral health for the disabled by providing the correct oral health care method to social workers residing in the welfare facility for the disabled. Methods: Four dental hygienists and four social workers were given the class I intellectual disabilities living in 'o' welfare facilities for disabled people in Songpa-gu, Seoul from April 13, 2019 to April 20, 2019. Patient Hygiene Performance(PHP) Index were measured and compared. In advance, the social workers were taught brushing (Rolling method), and the method of brushing and measuring tools were integrated. Results: Twice a total of dental hygienists and social workers practiced toothbrushing(Rolling method) for the class I intellectual disabilities who is a person to be brushed. When comparing the Patient Hygiene Performance(PHP) Index after the second round, the result shows that both the first and second dental hygienists' Patient Hygiene Performance(PHP) Index is lower. Conclusions: Comparing oral health knowledge level and Patient Hygiene Performance(PHP) index of dental hygienist and social workers, the result shows that dental hygienist has higher oral health care ability. Therefore, the dental hygienist should be placed in welfare facility for the disabled as an expert in oral health management to create an environment in which the disabled and social workers can be trained. In addition, the curriculum of the college that nurtures the dental hygienists should have a course to understand the characteristics of the disabled person in order to enhance the professionalism of dental hygienists.

• Environmental engineer
• /
• s.117
• /
• pp.4-6
• /
• 1996

• Feed Journal
• /
• v.2 no.6
• /
• pp.52-57
• /
• 2004

현대는 인간의 복지와 환경보호의 양면을 중요하게 여기는 시대이다. 생물을 담보로 생산성을 추구하는 모든 산업이 환경에 친화적이면서 인간복지에 기여하는 산업으로 접목되기를 강요하고 있는 시대다. 이러한 현상은 범세계적인 추세다. 이러한 대전제에 부응한 산업이 되었을 때 얻게되는 수익에서 수익의 합리성을 찾을 수 있고 지속적인 성장이 기대되는 산업으로 보장받을 수 있기 때문인 것으로 생각된다. (중략)

• 가정의 벗
• /
• v.37 no.5 s.429
• /
• pp.24-25
• /
• 2004

2003년 1월 울산광역시지회로 설립하여 울산시민들의 삶의 질 향상을 위한 보건$\cdot$복지 및 건강증진 서비스 등 능률적인 사업을 추진하고 있습니다. 2003년 11월 가족보건의원 신축기공식을 갖고 2004년 5월 초 신청사로 이전하게 되었습니다. 앞으로도 쾌적한 환경속에서 울산 시민의 건강을 지키며 사랑받는 울산광역시지회로 더욱 발전하겠습니다.

• Journal of The Korea Institute of Healthcare Architecture
• /
• v.26 no.2
• /
• pp.83-87
• /
• 2020

• 한국사회복지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2005.04a
• /
• pp.703-719
• /
• 2005

본 연구는 사회복지관에서 이루어지는 실습 내용을 분석하여 효과적인 실습지도를 위한 실천적 지침을 제시하고, 궁극적으로 실습 성과 평가를 위한 기초 자료를 제공하는데 목적을 두고 있다. 이틀 위해 서울시에 소재한 사회복지관 30개소의 실습지도계획서를 내용분석 연구방법을 사용하여 분석하였다. 그 결과, 사회복지관에서 진행된 실습 내용을 일반주의 실천에 근거하여 5개 범주, 14개 단위로 세부 내용을 추출하였다. 각 범주는 클라이언트 체계 개입, 조직 환경 이해, 전문적 발달, 서비스 전달체계 이해, 기본적 대인관계 기술의 순으로 전체 실습 내용에서 차지하는 빈도가 높게 나타났다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 효과적인 사회복지현장실습을 위한 이론적 실천적 함의를 제시하였다.

• Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
• /
• v.33 no.4
• /
• pp.403-411
• /
• 2023

Objectives: Formalin is used as an anthelmintic in farms where flounder are raised. In this study, we aim to identify formaldehyde exposure levels for aquaculture industry workers and provide basic data for managing formaldehyde exposure. Methods: Exposure levels of formaldehyde in the air, including formalin spraying operations, were assessed separately for personal and area samples. In addition, considering the formalin administration method, dermal exposure to the hands was estimated when administering the chemical, and dermal exposure to the legs during water tank work was estimated by collecting water in the water tank and evaluating the amount of formaldehyde remaining. Finally, the respiratory exposure level and the estimated dermal exposure level were added to derive the total exposure level and compared with the maximum allowable human dose. Results: As a result of the airborne evaluation, the formaldehyde concentration of the worker (1 person) who performed the formalin spraying and flounder sorting was 33.61 ppb, and the arithmetic mean of formaldehyde concentrations of the workers (3 people) who only performed the flounder sorting was 3.28 ppb (range: 2.25-4.89 ppb). In the case of dermal exposure, when spraying formalin once, the amount was estimated to be 0.33-2.62 mg when wearing protective gear and 3.27-26.12 mg when not wearing it. Conclusions: There was a difference in the formaldehyde exposure level of workers depending on their operation of handling formalin and whether or not protective gear was worn. In particular, because the level of formaldehyde exposure due to dermal exposure can be significant, there is a need to improve formalin administration methods in a way that avoids skin contact as much as possible.