• Title/Summary/Keyword: 복지 구상

Search Result 35, Processing Time 0.01 seconds

환경복지 구상

  • 환경보전협회
    • Bulletin of Korea Environmental Preservation Association
    • /
    • v.18 no.4
    • /
    • pp.20-28
    • /
    • 1996
  • PDF

The Public Health Welfare Conception of the Beveridge Report and Its Realization via the NHS (베버리지 보고서의 의료보장 구상과 NHS를 통한 구현)

  • Juneyoub Han;Jiyong Park
    • The Korean Society of Law and Medicine
    • /
    • v.24 no.3
    • /
    • pp.59-104
    • /
    • 2023
  • This essay attempts to analyze the public health welfare conception within the text of the Beveridge Report and its realization via the NHS in Great Britain. Once referring to the influence of the Report to create the foundations of the 20th-century welfare system, the quest to scrutinize the original intentions of the Report and its succession to the NHS is certainly intriguing. Furthermore, when regarding the significance of public health policy for a modern state, the effort to engage in Beveridge's conception and its realization is more than timely. In light of such a premise, this paper indulges in its study by the following methods. First, the historical background of the Report - namely, the role of the spirit of the age and the experience of the Emergency Medical Service are to be analyzed to identify the origins of the welfare policies proposed by Beveridge. Furthermore, the public health welfare conception of the Report conceived from its time is reflected upon by engaging on the goal towards social welfare and public health scheme. Lastly, the aims of the NHS and its management, treatment classification, and rehabilitation program are reviewed for comparative analysis with the Report to survey the realization of Beveridge's design. In this process, this paper not only takes into account the original text of the Report - but also other essential works of law and public policy, including the NHS Constitution for England and the National Health Service Act of 1946. The intentions of this study are not bound by merely coinciding with the Report, but resonate significance via reflecting upon the Beveridgian legacy on the modern welfare state from the current perspective. The structured analysis to research the aims and policies of the Report and to compare them to the reality of the NHS may provide an opportunity to confirm the realization of Beveridge's scheme in British society. In addition, this essay is part of an academic endeavor to critically assess the past and the present of the welfare institution in the public health sector. As such, it is hopeful that the essay sheds light on further studies concerning the constructive remedies of the Korean welfare system as well.

명사취재-김찬우 국회보건복지위원장

  • KOREA ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH PROMOTION
    • 건강소식
    • /
    • v.22 no.10 s.239
    • /
    • pp.5-7
    • /
    • 1998
  • 15대 국회 후반기, 보건복지위원장으로 선출된 김찬우 의원. 보건의료계 출신으로 위원장에 선출된 만큼, 보건의료계에서 거는 기대도 남다르다. 11대에 정계에 입문해, 의사 정치인으로서의 길을 걸어 온 김찬우 위원장은, 세간의 기대 이전에 의사 출신으로서 국민 특히 취약계층의 건강과 복지를 꼭 실현하겠다는 확고한 신념과 계획을 가지고 있다. 김위원장의 취약계층에 대한 사랑은 젊을 때부터 몸소 실천해 온 일이기도 하다. 정치에 입문하기 훨씬 이전부터, 고향인 영덕에서 개원하여 지역주민을 위한 인술을 펼쳐왔던 것. 그를 국회로 보내기를 강력히 희망했던 고향사람들의 의지는, 그저 고향을 빛내기 위한 일이 아니었음을 짐작케 하는 이력이기도 하다. 그의 첫인상은 우선, 소탈하고 서민적이어서 우리 아버지 혹은 이웃과 같은 편안함을 느낄 수 있게 한다. 그러나 대화를 해 나갈수록 일에 대한 강한 열정과 적극성 또한 대단한 사람이 김 위원장이다. 사랑의 의술, 사랑의 정치, 사랑의 보건복지를 위해 한번 화끈하게 뛰어보겠다는 김찬우 위원장의 보건복지정책 구상을 들어본다.

  • PDF

국민보건증진을 위한 장기보건교육계획 구상

  • 유원하
    • Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion
    • /
    • v.4 no.1
    • /
    • pp.1-5
    • /
    • 1987
  • 우리나라는 그동안 급속한 경제성장의 결과 국민들의 경제사회 생활이 향상됨에 따라 건강에 대한 국민의 관심이 고조되었고, 보건의료를 비롯한 복지욕구도 해마다 증대되어 왔다. 이러한 국민적 욕구에 부응하여 정부는 2000연대를 향한 기초사업을 이미 제사차경제개발 5개년 계획시부터 사회개발정책의 일환으로 시작 하였으며 금년부터 시행하고 있는 제6차 계획 가운데 사회개발정책의 주요과제의 하나로서 국민보건의료의 확충사업을 채택하여 경제성장의 혜택을 모든 국민계층에 형평되게 배분함으로써 국민건강증진을 통한 복지사회 구현을 도모하도록 하고 있다.

  • PDF

Working Atmosphere and The Role of Agency Influencing Collaborative Working between Health and Social Welfare Services -The Application of E-S Model to Two Pilot Projects- (보건복지협력에 영향을 미치는 업무환경과 실행자의 역할 - 두 시범사업에 대한 E-S모델의 적용 -)

  • Lee, Eun-Kyung
    • Korean Journal of Social Welfare
    • /
    • v.62 no.1
    • /
    • pp.155-183
    • /
    • 2010
  • Despite the increase in the demands on collaboration between health and social welfare, the success of such schemes have been limited. The extant literatures tends to be dominated by explanations for needs or short-term outcomes of collaboration rather than systematic follow-up research to apply to the frontline. At the same time, there is no attempt to apply the theories related to collaboration in order to discuss the situation. This study explores the factors hindering such collaborative working in the frontline, through semi-structured interviews with practitioners involved in two pilot projects. A theoretical framework (Equilibrium Model-Sensemaking, E-S model) which combined Equilibrium Model of 'Interorganizational Network' of Benson(1975) and 'Sensmaking' of Weick(1995) for conceptualiing aspects of collaborations such as working atmosphere and agency was applied to the empirical study of the Public Health and Welfare Office(1995-1999) and the Social Welfare office(2004-2006) pilot projects. Data were collected over three months from 8 pilot project areas with practitioners and managers from health and social welfare. The findings show significant regional differences between pilot areas, such as the presence of active leaders and co-location, had a major impact on the ability of practitioners to effectively integrate services. In other words, active leaders tended to influence practitioners' motivation, while co-location encouraging communication between both practitioners, and thus seemed to influence the practices of collaborative working. Furthermore, through E-S model, it is interpreted that this kind of positive experiences about collaborations may impact on the current practitioners' comprehensive perspective towards health and social welfare services in general. The findings could help policy makers consider the practical ways to break down the barriers between health and social welfare.

  • PDF