• Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
• /
• 2017.05a
• /
• pp.361-362
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 사회복지실천 현장의 주요 공급자인 사회복지 기관종사자와 자원봉사자의 복지와 자원봉사활동에 대한 인식을 조사 분석함으로써 양자 간 상호 인식의 유사점과 차이점을 알아보는 것이 목적이다. 설문조사 기간은 2016년 5월 24일부터 5월 30일까지이며, 사회복지 기관종사자 179명, 자원봉사자 186명 등 365명을 조사한 설문지를 최종분석에 활용하였다. 연구결과, 첫째, 양자 간 복지인식과 자원봉사인식에 있어서 일치하는 부분도 일부 있지만, 대부분 상당한 인식 격차가 존재하였다. 둘째, 양자는 서로 협력하고 연대해야 한다는 인식에 대한 양자 간의 높은 일치성은 서로 간에 더 활발한 교류와 합의의 가능성을 열어 놓고 있었다. 셋째, 양자 간의 복지인식과 자원봉사인식은 사회복지서비스를 제공할 때에 어떤 유형으로든 영향을 미칠 수 있는 중요한 매개변수 역할을 할 것으로 나타났다. 넷째, 양자 간의 인식이 어떠한지에 따라 양자는 서로 영향을 받을 것으로 예측되었다. 다섯째, 양자 간 인식 결과들은 서로 존재하면서, 서로에 대한 관심이 미약했다고 할 수 있다.

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies
• /
• no.37
• /
• pp.319-344
• /
• 2008

The Purpose of this study is to observe the existence of welfare attitude split between welfare regimes clique and to explore the effect of institutional(regime) characteristics on welfare attitude. And Second purpose is to find the characteristics of structure of welfare attitude and then to clarify the characteristics of welfare attitude in Korea. This work contribute to find the point of solidarity and split and to work out the strategical clues for constructing pro-welfare politics. To compare the attitude on the state responsibility about the welfare, Sweden, France, US, and Korea is selected. And the effect of sex, age, education level, income class, and labor status which are abstracted from existing welfare state comparative study are analyzed. The result show the difference in welfare attitude score between countries. The welfare attitude score is Sweden, France and US in order. the Score in Korea is lowest. In the case of the effect structure of welfare attitude between countries, there are no differences between Sweden and France. But the specific characteristics in US and Korea, are observed. And the effect structure of sex, class, labor status is equal in Sweden, France, and US. That is, women, people in low class, and people in low labor status more emphasize the state responsibility on the welfare. But the effect structure of age of US is different comparing other countries. In US, the old age is tend to less support the state responsibility. The education level operate as the effect factor in only US. And Korea show the different effect structure on the welfare attitude. This understanding about structure of welfare consciousness become the basis to construct the strategy for welfare state by proposing the point of consensus and conflict to conversion of welfare paradigm.

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies
• /
• no.36
• /
• pp.227-252
• /
• 2008

This study investigated the relation between social worker's beliefs on the nature of scientific knowledge which has been classified objectivism and constructivism and social work practice. As an epistemological position, constructivism is based on a view of knowledge that differs from that of objectivism, which holds that knowledge exists "out there" as objective truth. The focus of this paper is a examination on epistemological beliefs of social worker and social work practice. This paper proves that social work's epistemological beliefs have an effect on the practice modes. This research indicates that social works have a higher constructivist veiws than objectivist veiws on the nature of scientific knowledge. And social worker who have a high level of objectivism show a positive determinative mode. It has suggested that the constructive theory offers useful epistemology to the social worker who should deal with the clients in uncertain situations. In conclusion, a social worker with a high level of constructivism use an approach that creats a more equitable relationship between social worker and client. This perspective will allows cliens to participate in the formulation of theories in practice.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.20 no.8
• /
• pp.583-597
• /
• 2020

This study analyzed how elderly people's perception of social welfare affects social welfare service and social welfare policy satisfaction by paying attention to the use of social welfare services and satisfaction with social welfare policies. In order to achieve this research goal, 465 people aged 60 or older who completed responses to the additional survey were collected and analyzed as research targets based on data from the Korea Welfare Panel, which is accumulated by the Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs and Seoul National University's Social Welfare Research Institute. The results of this study are as follows. First, "Awareness of welfare for the elderly (recognition of welfare expenditure, recognition of welfare targets, recognition of welfare tax increases)" was found to have a negative impact on "use of social services." Second, "Awareness of welfare for the elderly (recognition of welfare expenditure, recognition of welfare targets, recognition of welfare tax increases)" was found to have a negative impact on "satisfaction with social welfare policies." Third, the impact of the recognition of welfare for the elderly on the use of social services was found to be different according to the demographic characteristics (education level, income level, educational background, gender). Fourth, according to the "population statistical characteristics (education level, income level, educational background, gender)" the impact of the recognition of welfare for the elderly on the satisfaction of social welfare policy was shown to be different. The implications of this study are that we looked at multi-dimensional welfare awareness and social service use experience together as factors affecting social welfare policy satisfaction. In other words, it is meaningful that the government focused on welfare awareness based on individual values and subjective perceptions as an influence on social welfare policy satisfaction, and sought practical alternatives to welfare policies and welfare sites by examining whether the experience of using social services in relation to welfare awareness and social welfare policy satisfaction among the elderly.

• 한국사회정책
• /
• v.23 no.1
• /
• pp.257-285
• /
• 2016

The purpose of this paper is to examine the determinants of public attitudes toward welfare spending in relation with the perception of welfare level. Data from the national survey of 'the SSK Good Government Research Unit' are used to perform a logistic regression analysis of the association between welfare attitudes and government perceptions, political orientations, and socio-economic backgrounds. The most prominent finding is that the determinants of welfare attitudes differ markedly between the two different groups of welfare perception. The empirical results say that persons living in a corrupt government tend to prefer welfare spendings despite having low level of welfare, and persons living in a unjust government tend to prefer welfare expansion because welfare level must be low. Persons living in a government of great capacity tend to have positive attitudes to welfare spending despite having a high level of welfare, whereas persons living in a government of less capacity tend to have negative attitudes to welfare expansion because the level of welfare is too high beyond government capacity. This distinction between the two perceptions of welfare level provides a systemic understanding of public attitudes toward welfare spending.

• Cement
• /
• s.199
• /
• pp.28-34
• /
• 2013

고령화의 급속한 진행에 따른 복지 재정 고갈 문제가 청년 실업 확대와 맞물리며 세대간 갈등을 야기할 수 있다는 우려가 제기되고 있다. 우리나라는 세대간 복지 관련 인식이 많은 차이를 보이기 때문에 그에 대한 간극을 정확하게 분석해야만 향후 복지 정책의 방향성에 대해 가늠해 볼 수 있다. 이에 현대경제연구원은 지난 4월 10일부터 16일까지 전국 성인남녀 1,004명을 대상으로 복지 관련 세대간 인식차이에 대해 설문조사를 실시하고 그 결과를 최근 발표했다. 여기서는 현대경제연구원 장후석 연구위원의 '복지에 대한 세대간 인식 차이 조사' 보고서를 통해 복지에 대한 세대별 인식 차이를 분석하고 시사점에 대해 살펴본다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2022.05a
• /
• pp.74-74
• /
• 2022

국민의 삶의 질을 개선하는 문제가 경제정책의 주요 의제로 떠오르면서 성장률 자체보다는 성장의 질을 개선하자는 논의는 이미 제기된지 오래이다. 물관리 분야에서도 상·하수도 보급률이100%에 가까운 수준으로 인프라는 완성단계에 있다고 해도 과언은 아니다. 그러나 홍수, 가뭄, 수질 오염 등 다양한 물 관련 사고가 빈번하게 발생하고 있으며, 지자체마다 피해의 대응수준도 차이가 있다. 물복지를 "모든 국민이 언제나 물이 제공하는 혜택을 받고 보다 나은 삶의 질을 보장 받는 것"으로 정의하였을 때 지자체마다 물복지 인프라 수준도 다르고 지역 주민이 느끼는 물복지 수준도 다를 것이다. 물복지 수준 향상을 위해서는 지역 주민이 체감하고 있는 물복지 수준에 대해서 조사하고 정책에 대한 시민들의 수요 조사를 통해 물복지 정책을 수립할 필요가 있다. 따라서 본 연구는 물관리 및 물복지 정책에 대한 우리나라 국민의 인식 수준을 파악하기 위해 2021년 10월 2천명을 대상으로 온라인 설문조사를 수행하였다. 특히 지역에 따른 물복지 혜택의 격차를 조사하기 위하여 거주 지역에 대한 물이용의 인식 수준을 함께 질문하여 물복지 지수 분석 결과와 국민의 인식 간의 격차를 확인하였다. 본 연구 결과를 통하여 대국민 인식을 반영한 물 정책 우선순위를 파악함으로써 최적 정책 시행 등 향후 물정책 방안 수립에 활용할 수 있다.

• 한국사회정책
• /
• v.23 no.1
• /
• pp.125-150
• /
• 2016

This study was carried out to empirically analyze the hypothesis that the impact of the welfare status on the welfare attitudes is moderated by each individual's level of confidence in government. To do this, this study focused on the welfare status known as the significant predictors of welfare attitudes and measured the welfare status as a gap between 'welfare contribute' and 'welfare benefit' in a single dimension, which is defined as 'material sacrifice'. Also, this study examined the main effect of material sacrifice and trust in government on the welfare attitudes and moderating effect of trust in government on relationship between material sacrifice and welfare attitudes. This study was performed with secondary data from 8th year of "2013 Korea Welfare Panel Study". Hypothesis of this study were verified using hierarchical multiple regression analysis. The major findings of this study are summarized as follow. 'Material sacrifice' was found to be negatively associated with the welfare attitudes. However, as the confidence in which social policies will be carried out competently by government increases, it was confirmed that the negative effect of material sacrifice on the welfare attitudes was moderated. It suggests that self-material interests associated with welfare could be moderated by beliefs and expectations about the government's functions, which means that expanding the reliance on the social policy is an important task in order to lead a social consensus for the welfare expansion.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.22 no.1
• /
• pp.505-515
• /
• 2022

The purpose of this study is to identify the characteristics and differences in the perception of professionalism of workers in public and private social welfare institutions, and to understand the effect of professionalism perception on job commitment and performance. The main results and implications are as follows. First, there was a statistically significant difference in the perception of professionalism of public and private social workers. Specifically, private 3.26 and public 3.15 were higher in the recognition of professionalism of social workers working in the private sector than in the public sector. Second, both public and private social workers' perception of professionalism had an effect on job commitment and job performance. In other words, the higher the recognition of professionalism, the higher the job commitment and performance of both private and public sector workers. Third, workers in the private sector were higher in both job commitment and job performance than those in public institutions. In short, although professionalism perception affects the job commitment and performance of private and public workers, the job commitment and performance of private social welfare organizations with high professionalism awareness is high.

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare
• /
• v.62 no.1
• /
• pp.391-415
• /
• 2010

Recently, there were some welfare embezzlement cases of public social workers. The purpose of this study is to explore public perceptions of public social workers by analysing the comments named "datgeul" in the internet media discussion rooms("toronbang") about welfare embezzlement cases of public social workers. The results show that the main discourse about public social workers to perform a dual role as the public servants and social workers on the front line of public social welfare is that they are the victims of both a public official system and welfare administration system. In addition, social workers in public sphere are still recognized as service personnels with sacrifice and commitment rather than as professionals. Finally, the implications of this study were discussed to improve public perceptions of social welfare professionals.