• Title/Summary/Keyword: 베어링 위치 선정

Search Result 13, Processing Time 0.018 seconds

Selection issue on the balance shaft for a inline 4-cylinder engine as how to locate both supporting bearing and unbalance mass (직렬 4기통 엔진용 밸런스 샤프트 불평형 질량과 베어링 위치 선정 방법)

  • Lee, Dong-Won;Kim, Chan-Jung;Bae, Chul-Yong;Lee, Bong-Hyun
    • Proceedings of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering Conference
    • /
    • 2008.04a
    • /
    • pp.801-806
    • /
    • 2008
  • Large quantity of bending deformation as well as rotating torque fluctuation at the balance shaft are main struggles during the operation in a high speed rotation and thereby, two issues should be cleared at the design process of balance shaft module. Since two issues are highly related with balance shaft itself and particularly much sensitive to the location of both supporting bearing and unbalance mass, the design strategy on balance shaft should be investigated at the aspect of controlling two critical issues at the early stage of balance shaft design. To tackle two main problems, the formulation of objective function that minimizes critical issues, both bending deformation as well as torque fluctuation, is suggested to derive the optimal information on balance shaft. Then, optimal informations are reviewed at the practical logics and the guideline at the selection of locations, both supporting bearing and unbalance mass, is addressed at the final chapter.

  • PDF

Optimal Location Issue on both Supporting Bearing and Unbalance Mass of the Balance Shaft Module in a Inline 4-Cylinder Engine (직렬 4기통 엔진용 밸런스 샤프트 모듈의 불평형 질량 및 베어링 위치 선정)

  • Lee, Dong-Won;Kim, Chan-Jung;Bae, Chul-Yong;Lee, Bong-Hyun
    • Transactions of the Korean Society of Automotive Engineers
    • /
    • v.18 no.4
    • /
    • pp.1-7
    • /
    • 2010
  • Large quantity of bending deformation as well as irregular rotating torque fluctuation are the main struggles of the balance shaft module during a high speed rotation. Since two issues are much sensitive to the location of both supporting bearing and unbalance mass at a balance shaft, it is recommended to construct a design strategy on balance shaft at the early stage so as to save developing time and effort before approaches to the detailed design process. In this paper, an optimal design formulation is proposed to minimize the elastic strain energy due to bending as well as the kinematic energy of polar moment of inertia in rotation. Case studies of optimal design are conducted for different mass ratio as well as linear combination of objective function and its consequence reveals that global optimum of balance shaft model is existed over possible design conditions. Simulation shows that best locations of both supporting bearing and unbalance are globally 20% and 80%, respectively, over total length of a balance shaft.

Evaluating the Reaction Force of Office Chair Backrest for Different Joint Structures (사무용 의자의 조인트 구조에 따른 등판 반발력 분석)

  • Hyeong, Joon Ho;Kim, Sa Yup;Roh, Jong Ryun;Park, Seong Bin;Chung, Kyung Ryul
    • Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers B
    • /
    • v.39 no.6
    • /
    • pp.535-540
    • /
    • 2015
  • The location of the pivot between the backrest and seat pan of a reclining chair should be identical to the hip joint center to prevent unpleasant user experiences during tilting motion. However, mechanical friction occurs in the pin-in-slot joints that are installed under the seat pan as an alternative to the hinge joint. This reduces the reaction force between the backrest and the occupant's back when reclining and returning to an upright position, which causes the occupant's discomfort. In this study, bearings, rollers, and sliders were suggested as alternatives for the pin component, and the percentage of the reaction force on the backrest was measured while reclining the backrest and subsequently returning it to an upright position. The results show when bearings, rollers, and sliders were used for the pin-in-slot joint, the percentages of the reaction force were $59.7{\pm}10.3$, $47.2{\pm}13.6$, and $30.3{\pm}18.1$, respectively, indicating that the friction of the bearing was the lowest among the three pin components. Because the three alternatives have different manufacturing costs, synthetic judgment requires the consideration of not only mechanical friction but also user experience.