• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2009.06a
• /
• pp.249-252
• /
• 2009

우리나라는 1993년 이래로 관제를 시행해 오고 있으며, 현재 11개 지방청에 관제시설을 갖추고 200명이 넘는 관제사가 관제업무에 종사하고 있다. 하지만, 제도적 요소는 관제구역의 설정과 관제구역내 모든 선박이 관제를 시행하기 위한 기본 규정도 올바로 준비되지 않은채 관제를 시행해온 문제가 드러났다. 본 연구에서는 관제에 있어 "있어야 할 법", 즉 입법 차원에서 필요한 법에 대해 고찰하고자 한다.

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.147
• /
• pp.333-356
• /
• 2018

Shang Yang was a person who, as a representative of the former School of Law, not only had an effect of thought on Han Fei Tzu, but also put a cornerstone of Qin Shi Huang's great universal unification by placing small and weak Qin Dynasty in a border area in the rank of a newly rising powerful nation. He is especially regarded as a person who valued laws and established the theoretical framework of legalist thought of School of Law systematically. To begin with, this writing examines the contents of the enforcement of legal reforms relevant to the prerequisite of Shang Yang's legal thought in historical archives, and confirms that Shang Yang succeeded in accomplishing legal reforms twice and that the aim of the legal reforms was to realize national prosperity and military power for the universal unification. This writing also takes notice of the fact that Shang Yang's legal thought went through specific steps for unifying the legal authority and the power of the monarch. Especially this writing focuses on applying the three-step theory of norms that was presented in the western social and political norm theory to Shang Yang's legal thought and on examining the characteristic and meaning explicitly. In short, the social and political norms go through emergence, cascade, and internalization. This writing aims to confirm that Shang Yang's legal thought also went through these three steps and was specified. Specifying this critical mind, this writing is a result which discusses that Shang Yang's legal thought went though the steps of the selective prescriptivism of emergence, the monarchical absolutism through sever punishment, and the internal monarchism for national prosperity and military power, and that the thought was systemized. Finding that the contents of Shang Yang's legal thought correspond to the three-step theory of norms and produce the individual meaning is the independent characteristic of this writing. It is the aim of this writing that the system and meaning of Shang Yang's legal thought will be confirmed more explicitly through this contextual examination.

• Journal of Legislation Research
• /
• no.54
• /
• pp.39-69
• /
• 2018

In $j{\ddot{u}}ngster$ Zeit wird eine Fiktion im Verwaltungsrecht als essentielles Instrument $f{\ddot{u}}r$ Deregulierung sowie Verwaltungsvereinfachung mehr und mehr ins Feld $gef{\ddot{u}}hrt$ und ihre Erweiterung gefordert, weil sie in der Regel auf das Zeitsparen durch Verfahrenswegfall zielt. In Deutschland $erh{\ddot{o}}hte$ sich eine Bedeutung der Genehmigungsfiktion, indem sie durch 4.Novelle des VwVfG, die bei der Umsetzung der Richtlinie 2006/123/EG $ben{\ddot{o}}tigt$ wurde, als ein allgemeines verwaltungsrechtliches Rechtsinstitut eingeordnet wird. In Korea gibt es $vielf{\ddot{a}}ltige$ Fiktionsmethode, $w{\ddot{a}}hrend$ im deutschen Recht die Fiktion lediglich darin besteh, nach Ablauf der festgesetzten Frist die Entscheidung bzw. den Verwaltungsakt anzunehmen. Die systematische und logische Festsetzung der Fiktionslehre in Korea ist erforderlich. Deshalb wird eine allgemeine Regel zur Fiktion durch eine Kodifikation des allgemeinen Verwaltungsgesetzes, wie VwVfG, gefordert.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.9 no.3
• /
• pp.578-605
• /
• 2006

This paper aims to review the regulations in the field of science and technology administration, especially the legal regulations in the management of public technologies. For this purpose, after reviewing the legal system and contents of regulation, analyze and estimate the adequacy and validity of them. So that, in this paper it is layed emphasis on that whether the regulation system is proper in point of legalism or theory of regulation law, and the regulations are appropriate when comparing with that of foreign countries, and the improvement is necessary in operating regulation system itself.

• Journal of Legislation Research
• /
• no.53
• /
• pp.311-335
• /
• 2017

국민들과 주민들의 입법참여를 위한 여러 방안들을 제도화 한 것은 의견을 수렴하기 위한 것에서 나아가 주권자인 국민과 대의기관이 협력하여 협치를 이루기 위한 것으로 볼 수 있다. 이미 제도화된 입법예고와 공청회 청문회를 비롯하여 입법청원과 주민의 조례의 제정 개폐청구권 등은 일방적으로 법을 입법하여 수범자에게 제시되는 것이 아니라, 국민들의 의견을 반영하고 협력하여 '좋은 법' 내지 '준수가능한 법'을 만들기위한 것이다. 또한 제도화되지는 않았거나 본질상 제도화될 수는 없는 것이지만 사회적 자율과 국가적 강제를 조화시키는 장점을 지니는 국민발안과 협상에 의한 규칙제정 그리고 시민입법 및 연성법 등도 협치라고하는 시대정신에 상응하는 입법경향에 해당하는 것이라고 볼 수 있다. 현행 제도인 입법청원이나 입법예고를 포함하여 법안심사 과정중에 공청회 청문회를 실질화하여 국민들의 의견을 입법에 적극 반영하는 것이 국가와 국민의 협치를 강화하는 것이며 조례의 제정이나 개폐 청구를 실질화하여 주민들의 의견을 자치입법에 적극 반영하는 것이 지방자치단체와주민의 협치를 강화하는 것이다. 또한 제도화는 안 되어 있지만 국민소환과 함께 도입이 주장되고 있는 국민발안제도 혹은 시민입법도 입법과정에서의 일방성을 시정하기 위한 협치의 한 방안이고 협상에 의한 입법이나 연성법의 활용도 협치적 요소를 강화하기 위한 방안이라고 볼 수 있다. 법률 행정입법 자치입법의 입법을 포함하여 연성규범에 있어서, 즉입법과정에서 공식적이건 비공식적이건 간에 협치의 의미를 실현하고 이를 적용할 영역은 이와 같이 다양하게 생각해 볼 수 있다. 입법을 통한방식의 국가의사 결정에 있어서 기존처럼 일방적인 방향성을 지니는 패러다임에서, 이제는 쌍방적인 방향성을 지니는 패러다임의 전환이 바람직하다고 할 수 있다. 특히 법률에 의한 행정과 재판이 법치주의의 본질적내용이기 때문에 국가작용에서 입법은 특히 중요하며, 입법과정에서 국민을 참여시키고 의견을 수렴하고자 하는 협치적 요소를 입법과 관련한 제도개선에 적극적으로 반영할 필요가 있다.

• The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
• /
• v.34 no.1
• /
• pp.3-38
• /
• 2019

In 1984, Congress enacted a new measure of administrative sanctions which is a civil money penalty program for violations of Aviation Act and its implementing regulations. This civil money penalty system has been in operations in lieu of suspending or revoking certificates issued by Korean government, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport. According to the rules of Aviation Business Act or Aviation Safety Act, where the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport should order an air carrier to suspend operation because of her violation under certain rules, in which case the suspension of operation is likely to cause serious inconvenience to consumers of air transport services or to harm public interest, the Minister of the department may impose an administrative monetary penalty in lieu of the suspension of operation. In this regard, airline related civil money penalties are somewhat different from those of fair trade, which is the origin of the money penalties system in Korea. Civil money penalties in the field of fair trade are imposed on executive duty violations that undermine the value of the market economy order, and focus on reimbursement of profits due to violations and compensation for unfair spending by consumers. However, in the aviation sector, breach of duty by a business operator does not simply cause the property loss of the public, but it has a direct impact on life or property of the public. In this respect, aviation penalties are more likely to be administrative sanctions or punitive measures than refunds of unfair benefits, compared to penalties in the field of fair trade. In general, civil money penalties have been highly preferred as administrative sanctions because they are subject to investigations by administrative experts and thus, efficiency can be ensured and execution is quicker than judicial procedures. Moreover, in Korea, because punitive civil damages cannot awarded by the courts, the imposition of civil money penalties is recognized as a means of realizing social justice by recognizing the legal feelings of the people. However, civil money penalties are administrative sanctions, and in terms of effectiveness, they are similar to criminal fines, which are a form of punishment. Inadequate legislation and operation of penalties imposition may cause damage to the value of Constitution. Under the above recognition, this paper has been described for the purpose of identifying the present status of the civil money penalties imposition system and operating status in the area of air transport under the laws and regulations in Korea. Especially, this paper was focused on exploring the problem and improvement direction of Korean system through the comparative study with foreign laws and regulations.

• Journal of Legislation Research
• /
• no.44
• /
• pp.241-281
• /
• 2013

First and foremost, a discussion concerning government structure has to be done in connection with the state form and the governmental form. For practical reasons, there is a need to balance the principle of legality and its exceptions under the Government Organization Act. To ensure the flexibility of government structure with respect to the principle of legality, the National Assembly should accept the government structure requested by the newly elected government. This mitigates the rigidity of the principle of the legality within the government organizations. However, excessive changes by each government could violate the principle of legality asked by Constitution. In this sense, arbitrary modification with respect to the government structure by the newly elected government is not desirable. The long term stability of the government organization is required in any case. Secondly, general administrative agencies, other than Executive Ministries, should not be established under the direct order of the President without the control of the Prime Minister. A hierarchy of the executive branch (President->Prime Minister-> Executive Ministries) is stipulated in the Constitution. Establishing a hierarchy of President -> executive institution should be considered unconstitutional. Therefore, only the Presidential Secretariat and institutions with special functions can be established in the Presidential Office. Establishing general administrative agencies in the Presidential Office for convenience purposes is against the spirit of the current Constitution. Consequently, only the office of staffs and special agencies can be placed in the presidential office. It is against the spirit of the current Constitution to found administrative agencies under the presidential office for convenience. Thirdly, the office of the Prime Minister should be the backbone of internal affairs. In that sense, the President, as the head of state, should focus on the big picture such as the direction of the State, while the Cabinet headed by the Prime Minister should be responsible for the daily affairs of the State. The cabinet surrounding the Prime Minister must control all the ordinary affairs of the State, while the President, as the head of the State, should focus on the big picture of blueprinting the aim of the State. Lastly, the Office of the Prime Minister and Executive Ministries are the two main bodies of the executive branch. It is important to reduce the confusion caused by repeated changes in the names of Executive Ministries, to restore the traditional names and authorities of these institutions, and to rehabilitate the legitimacy of the State. For the Korean democracy to take its roots, a systematic way of stabilizing a law-governed democratic country is needed. There is also the need not only to reform security and economic agencies, but also to rationally solve the integration of technique and policy, according to the changes of time.

• Journal of Service Research and Studies
• /
• v.11 no.4
• /
• pp.1-20
• /
• 2021

This study was conducted to derive a model of the legal system that is the basis for realizing the service economy, political administration, and social education system. Based on the experience of mankind's legal system operation in the historical era for the past 5,000 years, a legal system model that will make the future human society sustainable has been established. The problems of the current legal system were analyzed at the fundamental level. The root cause of injustice and unfairness was analyzed and a new legal system was designed. Through the legal systems of various national societies that have been attempted in the history of mankind, the structure of the legal system that is desirable for the modern society was designed. Human society, which has experienced how much good legal system has been and is being abused by human irrationality and nonsense, needs to make an effort to change the legal system paradigm itself by learning lessons from failure. This study derives the basis for a legal system that can realize justice and a fair society in the long term. It proposed a model for improving the legal system that allows human society to be happy for a long time. To this end, the fundamental role of the legal system was analyzed at the ideological level and the problems of the current legal system were presented. In addition, the problem of fundamental assumptions about human nature was analyzed and improved assumptions were presented. The structural system of the current legal system was analyzed and a new structure was proposed. In addition, a plan for the operation of a new legal system based on a new structure was suggested. The new legal system was named servicism system. This is because it is a model centered on thorough checks and balances between all opponents, not a simple linear one-dimensional legal system, but a multidimensional legal system, and because it is a viewpoint that clearly recognizes both human reason and desire. The new system is a model that reflects the confrontation between the rule of law and the non-law rule and the confrontation between the power people and the general public. A follow-up study is needed on a concrete plan for transitioning from the current legal system to a new legal system.

• Journal of Legislation Research
• /
• no.44
• /
• pp.103-153
• /
• 2013

This article aims at the legislation of User-Protection Act in area of ICT. In these days telecommunication and broadcasting are getting more and more convergent. The paradigm of ICT is turning over from the service provider to the end-user. User protection has been in each erea of ICT (C-P-N-D) individually regulated. In the area of telecommunication it is important to protect the interest of user, who stands in contract with the service provider. And in area of broadcasting it is important to protect the interest of viewers, who stands "gratis" with the broadcasters without any contracts. For the more efficient user-protection it is also necessary to make a dedicated organization under KCC(Korean Communications Committee). In this early year the government organization was divided into MSIP(Ministry of Science, ICT and future planing) and KCC. The user-protection act will be very important instrument of ICT regulation in the era of creative economy. It is necessary to establish a new frame act of user protection. It is also necessary to make start to establish a new system of user education in erea of ICT. It is strongly expected the new act will be a turning point of ICT development in Korea.

• Journal of Legislation Research
• /
• no.54
• /
• pp.71-110
• /
• 2018

Starting from the agenda that we should determine the function of local government at each level in order to facilitate decentralization, this article is dedicated to demonstrating problems in the practice of Korean legislation today. On the one hand, in the "local autonomy act", the local governments' function is designated by the term "affairs of local governments" which includes autonomous duites and the duties delegated by the State to local governments. Meanwhile, all of acts by which governments are granted the power of execution, upon the principle of "the reservation of law", does not distinguish the nature of each authority as well. On the other hand, as regards the legal status of the territorial collectivity, the practice in the legislation does not clearly distinguish between territorial representation and national delegation. If we want to achieve the decentralization, we should reevaluate and determine EVERY authority and responsibility of administrative service in terms of its nature whether it is for the local diversity or for the standardization of public service in the State. In following, we should have the terminology by which we can designate the territorial collectivity which is distinguished from the national organ at the local level in the legislation.