• Title/Summary/Keyword: 법적근거

Search Result 478, Processing Time 0.025 seconds

Introduction of Risk Based Inspection System Suitable for Domestic Circumstances (국내 실정에 적합한 위험기반검사 제도의 도입)

  • Lee, Hern-Chang;Cho, Ji-Hoon;Kwon, Hyuk-Myun;Ham, Byeong-Ho;Char, Soon-Chul;Kim, In-Tae;Chung, Eui-Soo;Kim, Tae-Ok
    • Proceedings of the Safety Management and Science Conference
    • /
    • 2007.04a
    • /
    • pp.143-149
    • /
    • 2007
  • 현행 우리나라의 검사제도는 사업장의 자율관리 능력을 고려하지 않고, 설비의 노후화 및 위험도와 무관하게 획일화된 방식으로 적용하여 설비의 안전성을 확보하지 못할 뿐만 아니라 정기 및 자체 검사를 병행하여 많은 불편이 있다. 따라서 사업장의 불편을 해소하고, 설비의 안전성과 신뢰도를 높일 수 있는 위험기반검사(risk based inspection, RBI)를 국내 실정에 적합하게 도입하기 위하여 사업장, 정부 및 관련 기관에서 향후 추진해야할 방향에 대하여 분석하였다. 국내에서 위험기반검사 제도가 정착될 수 있기 위해서는 먼저 법적 근거가 마련되어야 하며, 법적 제도가 마련되면 사업장에서 RBI를 적용 시 이를 검증하고, 관리할 수 있는 인증기구의 설치가 필요하다. 또한 위험기반검사를 수행하는 사업장에 대해서는 공정안전이행수준과 같은 위험기반검사 이행수준평가를 도입하고, 차등 적용하여 사업장을 관리하는 것이 바람직하다.

  • PDF

Regulatory Position of Fire Protection for Nuclear Power Plants (원자력발전소 화재방호에 대한 규제입장)

  • Kim, Wee-Kyong
    • Proceedings of the Korea Institute of Fire Science and Engineering Conference
    • /
    • 2009.04a
    • /
    • pp.241-247
    • /
    • 2009
  • 국내 원전 화재방호규정에서는 화재에 의한 원자로의 안전에 미치는 영향을 최소화하기 위하여 원전 사업자에게 설계단계에서부터 화재위험도분석을 수행하고 화재예방대책을 포함한 화재방호계획을 수립하도록 요구하고 있다. 이에 대한 세부지침으로 원전 도입국의 지침을 사용하고 있으나, 원자력발전 산업의 규모와 기술적인 분야를 주도하는 입장에서 한국원자력안전기술원은 법적근거를 확보할 수 있는 우리 고유의 지침을 개발하고 있다. 본 발표에서는 원전의 화재방호 규정과 세부지침 수립시 고려하고 있는 사항을 소개하고, 원전 화재 안전성을 향상시킬 수 있는 국내 원전 화재방호 규정 정립을 위한 방향을 제시하였다.

  • PDF

Wild Ginseng Digger's Digging Custom and Its Special Servitude of Korean Civil Act (산삼 심마니 채삼 관습과 민법상 특수지역권)

  • Byungil Bae
    • Journal of Ginseng Culture
    • /
    • v.5
    • /
    • pp.77-96
    • /
    • 2023
  • This study looks at the origin of a wild-ginseng, Korean ginseng, and traces the origin of associated wild-ginseng digging customs back to the Annals of the Joseon Dynasty. These historical customs helped Korea gain control over its wild ginseng resources following Japanese colonization acts, Korea's present-day forest laws, and Korean Civil Law. Prior to Japanese colonial rule in Korea (1910-1945), ginseng digging was a common custom, but Imperial Japan distorted Korea's own legal principles of the public rights of wild-ginseng digging during this colonial period. Distorted legal principles concerning digging customs continued after Korea's liberation from Japanese rule and were maintained until the enforcement of the Korean Civil Law in 1960, when legal principles of the right of common were changed to special servitude. The origin of the right of common can be found in the Sichojang of the Joseon Dynasty. The Sichojang, a place where local residents jointly collected firewood and fed livestock, was the minimum right to life and interest at the time. Since the right of common was the right to life, Imperial Japan attempted to abolish it, but it was never successful. In addition, distorted legal principles have been maintained in present-day forestry-related laws and regulations. Over 75 years since the liberation from Japanese rule in 1945, it is imperative to break away from the distorted legal principles and acknowledge that digging custom rights have changed from common customs to a special servitude under Korean Civil Law. Hence, an organization of wild-ginseng diggers is an unincorporated association, and their wild-ginseng digging customs can be constituted as a special servitude. Hence, their practices should be considered valid under customary law. Through this, it will be possible to clarify the legal nature and grounds for ginseng-related wild-ginseng digging activities, as well as the civil responsibility for the activities of wild-ginseng diggers.

Die Zul$\ddot{a}$ssigkeitpartikularer Personalvertretungen im deutsche Luftverkehr (독일에서의 항공운항종사자의 개별 직원대표의 허용성에 관한 고찰)

  • So, Jae-Seon
    • The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
    • /
    • v.26 no.1
    • /
    • pp.65-92
    • /
    • 2011
  • Die soeben entwickelten Grundgs$\ddot{a}$tze k$\ddot{o}$nnen dazu f$\ddot{u}$hren, dass es bei Fluggesellschaften zum Abschluss mehrerer Tarifvertr$\ddot{a}$ge $\ddot{u}$ber Personalvertretungen durch verschidene Gewerkschften kommt. Dies leitet schlie${\ss}$lich zu der bereits angesprochenen Problematik der Tarifkonkurrenz $\ddot{u}$ber. Tarifkonkurrenz zeichnet sich bekanntlich dadurch aus, dass f$\ddot{u}$r dasselbe Rechtsverh$\ddot{a}$ltnis dieselbe Regelungsmaterie durch mehr als einen Tarifvertrag geregelt wird. Eine solche Tarifkonkurenz kann unabh$\ddot{a}$ngig von der Frage, ob Regelungsgegenstand betriebsverfassungsrechtlicher Normen ein betriebliches Rechtsverh$\ddot{a}$ltnis ist, auch bei dieser Art von Tarifnormen auftreten. Dabei betriebsverfassungsrechtlichen Kollektivnormen gem$\ddot{a}{\ss}$ $\S$3 Abs. 2 TVG die Tarifbindung des Arbeitgebers f$\ddot{u}$r die Anwendungsbarkeit gen$\ddot{u}$gt, wird beim Vorhandensein mehrerer solcher Tarifvertr$\ddot{a}$ge h$\ddot{a}$ufig pauschal von einer in jedem Fall aufzul$\ddot{o}$senden tarifkonkurrenz gesprochen. $\ddot{U}$berschneiden sich die Geltungsbereiche mehrerer Tarifvertr$\ddot{a}$ge $\ddot{u}$ber personalvertretungsrechtliche Fragen der im Luftbetrieb t$\ddot{a}$tigen Besch$\ddot{a}$ftigten und handelt es sich nicht um textidentische Regelungen, f$\ddot{u}$hrt indes kein Weg daran vorbei, dass eine Tarifkonkurenz besteht, die einer Aufl$\ddot{o}$sung bedarf. Die Rechtsprechung hat sich zur speziellen Fragen der Aufl$\ddot{o}$sung einer Konkurrenz betriebsverfassungsrechtlicher Tarifnormen soweit ersichtlich noch nicht ge$\ddot{a}$u${\ss}$ert. Nicht zuletzt aus diesem Grund wird in der Literatur ein buntes Spektrum an L$\ddot{o}$sungen pr$\ddot{a}$sentiert, wobei sich die meisten neueren Stellungnahmen vor allem mit Organisationstarifvertr$\ddot{a}$gen im Sinne von ${\S}$3 BetrVG besch$\ddot{a}$ftigen.

  • PDF

Unconstitutionality of Call to Arms for Police Action (치안활동을 위한 군병력동원의 위헌여부에 관한 고찰)

  • Cho, Sung-Je
    • The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
    • /
    • v.11 no.6
    • /
    • pp.419-427
    • /
    • 2011
  • As for the anti-terrorism bills, which were submitted to the National Assembly, the mobilization of anti-terrorism commando, which was designated or established by the National Defense Minister, is mobilized the military troops without being based on marital law in light of the constitutional law, thereby possibly violating the constitution, first of all, with regards to mobilization of anti-terrorism commando, which was formed with military troops. The anti-terrorism commando is the military force, which was trained professionally for the anti-terrorism activity. Thus, the violation of human rights may be greatly reduced rather than what general soldiers are putted in the public-order activity such as anti-terrorism. However, it is thought to be desirable to make it possible for the input of special forces, which were trained professionally in relation to anti-terrorism activity, through constitutionally revising the constitutional law. As for the provision of 'support for military troops' in the anti-terrorism bill, what is a case that the nation's important facilities and multi-use facilities are difficult to be protected from terror with the anti-terrorism commando and police force needs to be constitutionally regarded as resulting in reaching the level enough to correspond to 'a state of national emergency equivalent to wartime incident.' Thus, enacting the future anti-terrorism law, it is thought to be unnecessary for having the provision of 'support for military troops' with receiving criticism obstinately for possibly violating the constitution.

A Legal Review for Financial Independence of Local Cultural Centers (지방문화원의 재정자립을 위한 법적 검토)

  • Lee, Hong Kee
    • 지역과문화
    • /
    • v.8 no.4
    • /
    • pp.23-42
    • /
    • 2021
  • This article examines the legal measures to establish the financial independence of the Local Cultural Centers(LCCs) by the revision of Promotion of Local Cultural Centers Act(PLCC Act) to allow profit-making activities of LCCs. For the past 70 years, LCCs have been the core of local culture, but they have not been financially independent and have survived through government subsudues and support funds. Its weak financial structure that depends on the subsidies makes it difficult to carry out the essential business and threatens sustainability. Legally, LCCs are special corporations which established in accordance with the PLCC Act, and their legal status and functions are stipulated in accordance with the laws governing their establishment. The current PLCC Act does not stipulate that the LCC may conduct profit-making business other than the essential business. However, compare to the other special corporations which established by their own legislatives, it is understood that the PLCC Act can also provide regulations related to the profit business of LCCs. This article presents legal drafts for PLCC Act and suggests other necessary discussions for financial independence of LCCs.

A Study on Regulation of Video on Demand Advertisements (주문형서비스(Video on Demand) 광고 규제에 관한 연구)

  • Cho, Dae-keun;Kim, Ki-youn
    • Journal of Internet Computing and Services
    • /
    • v.17 no.4
    • /
    • pp.145-159
    • /
    • 2016
  • This study points out the problems of absence of the legislation for standard regulation on Video on Demand(VoD) advertisement which grows so fast lately, for this it recommends making legal references, which have the definition of non-linear broadcasting & VoD advertisement and VoD advertisement standard regulation in the merged Broadcasting Act, and adopting co-regulation system. Pay TV operators providing VoD service have the opportunities to make money as subscribers uses it increasingly. In case of linear service, the Broadcasting Act regulates the advertisement strictly, but not the VoD ads. The reason why is that Korean legislation including the Broadcasting Act does not have legal reference to regulate it, instead of that, it rely on the self-regulation system which is operated by pay-tv players who provide the VoD ads. So, there is the limitation to protect the minors such as children and youth from the harmful VoD ads, to be invulnerable for advertisers to influence to advertising agents, and to ensure the regulatory effectiveness under player-centric self-regulatory regime. In this context, this study analyses the how to regulate VoD ads standard with a three-pronged approach. First, it analyses the VoD ads regulation system in overseas countries, UK, Canada, EU and Ireland. Each country has the legal reference to regulate it in the Broadcasting Act or lower statures and adopts the co-regulatory regime the NRA and the 3rd entity operate together. Second, it reviews the objectives and scope of VoD ads standard. This study recommends that the objective of it is users protection and the scope of it is standard regulation not commercial practice. Third, this study researches how to legislate for regulation of VoD ads standard. Considering VoD service's characteristics(non-linear service) and legal position of Ads agency(i.e. pay tv operators), it suggest that legal reference will be in the integrated Broadcasting bill, which is the general law, not individual. If it is available to regulate VoD ads standard with co-regulatory regime, it expects the enhancement of user protection from the harmful VoD ads and make up sustainability of the pay-tv players' self-regulation.

The Uncontested Principle and Wonbae Choi's Objections (논란 없는 원리와 최원배 교수의 반론)

  • Lee, Byeong-Deok
    • Korean Journal of Logic
    • /
    • v.15 no.2
    • /
    • pp.273-294
    • /
    • 2012
  • In my previous article "An Inferentialist Account of Indicative Conditionals" and "An Inferentialist Account of Indicative Conditionals and Hasuk Song's Objections", I argued that the so-called Uncontested Principle is not uncontestable. According to the Uncontested Principle, an indicative conditional '$A{\rightarrow}C$' logically implies a material conditional '$A{\supset}C$'. In his recent paper "On the Recent Controversies surrounding the Uncontested Principle" Wonbae Choi presents three objections to my claim. First, my denial of the Uncontested Principle implies rejecting modus ponens. Second, my denial of the Uncontested Principle is tantamount to taking the truth-conditions of an indicative conditional as weaker than those of a material conditional, which are usually taken to be the weakest among conditionals. Third, my view that we can warrantedly assert '$A{\rightarrow}C$' even when 'A ${\therefore}$ C' is inductively justified is based on a misunderstanding of the way in which indicative conditionals are justified. In this paper I argue that Choi's objections are all based on misunderstandings of my view. First, I do not deny the validity of modus ponens (as a form of deductive reasoning). Second, the fact that the inductive warrantability of 'A ${\therefore}$ C' does not imply the truth of '$A{\supset}C$' does not show that the truth-conditions of an indicative conditional is weaker than those of a material conditional. Third, Choi's claim that a contingent conditional '$A{\rightarrow}C$' is true only when 'C' can be deductively derived from 'A' in conjunction with a hidden premiss is not well grounded, nor does it fit the facts.

  • PDF

문화와 경쟁(I) : 경쟁법적 시각에서 본 스크린쿼터

  • 서헌제
    • Journal of Korea Fair Competition Federation
    • /
    • no.116
    • /
    • pp.2-6
    • /
    • 2005
  • 스크린쿼터는 문화적 다양성을 지키기 위한 수단으로서 통상협상의 대상이 아니라는 것이 국내 영화인들의 지배적인 생각이지만 순수예술과는 달리 대중을 상대로 하는 영화에 있어서 문화적 다양성이란 창작의 다양성보다는 오히려 소비의 다양성 확보에 더 큰 비중이 두어져야 한다고 본다. 그러므로 한국영화의 경쟁력 확보를 위해 소비자들의 영화선택권을 제한해 온 스크린 쿼터는 더 이상 유지되어야 할 근거가 없어졌으며, 만일 스크린 쿼터의 폐지나 축소에 따라 외국영화의 국내시장 독점이 문제된다면 이는 시장경제의 파수꾼인 경쟁법에 맡겨야 할 것이다.

  • PDF

MCN환경하에서 실시간 개인방송의 법적 쟁점

  • Kim, Yun-Myeong
    • Information and Communications Magazine
    • /
    • v.33 no.4
    • /
    • pp.79-84
    • /
    • 2016
  • 개인방송을 방송법상 방송으로 보기 어렵다. 다만, IPTV법의 실시간 방송프로그램 내지 저작권법상 전송 등 2중적 지위를 갖는다. 방송이라면 일정한 경우에 보상금만을 지급하고 저작물을 이용할 수 있지만, 지금의 해석으로는 어렵다. BJ의 일탈이 사회적 통념을 넘어선 경우라면 사후 규제를 위해서라도 플랫폼사업자에게 일정 시간동안 개인방송을 저장할 수 있도록 권고할 필요가 있다. 최소한 방송이라는 인식에 근거하여 방송이 추구하는 공적 가치를 가질 필요가 있기 때문이다. 시청자는 방송과 통신을 구분하여 콘텐츠를 소비하지 않는다. 개인방송도 방송과 같은 공공성을 확보할 수 있다면 법제 정비를 통해 공익성 요건을 적용할 필요가 있다. 방송법의 목적인 "국민문화의 향상"이라는 가치에서 본다면 개인방송도 국민문화를 위한 주요한 수단이기 때문이다.