• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
• /
• 2014.07a
• /
• pp.135-138
• /
• 2014

상속결격이란 피상속인이 상속할 순위에 있지만 그 자가 피상속인 등의 생명침해 혹은 피상속인의 유언행위에 대해 고의로 위법한 침해를 한 경우에 상속인자격을 박탈하는 제도이다. 상속인에게 법정결격사유가 발생하면 그 상속인은 법률상 당연히 상속인 자격을 상실하게 된다. 이렇게 상속인자격을 상실한 자를 상속결격자라고 한다. 즉 윤리적 경제적 관계에 있는 피상속인과의 정당한 상속관계를 파괴하는 자에게 상속권을 인정하지 않는 일종의 제재를 가하여야 한다는 상식 속에 그 근거가 있다고 본다. 우리나라의 현행 민법 제 1004조에 상속인의 결격사유를 규정하고 있으나, 특히 유언장을 위조한 상속인은 제1004조 5호 규정에 의거 상속결격사유가 발생되는데, 상속결격은 일신전속권인 효과로 인하여 다른 상속인들에게 그 효과가 미치지 않기 때문에 결국 대습상속을 통하여 실질적으로 상속재산의 소유권행사를 할 수 있는 등 여러 가지 문제점을 안고 있어, 본 논문에서는 우리나라 상속결격제도의 문제점을 지적하고 그에 대한 개선방안을 제시하고자 한다.

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.146
• /
• pp.25-48
• /
• 2018

Starting from common sense that happiness is a state where needs are satisfied, this paper suggests the intelligence and the virtues for democratic citizens. The fact that human beings exist, relate to each other, and undertake activities which can become of moral worth when joined by autonomy, equality, and responsibility, respectively, is explained. It is also discussed that happy citizens should be able to exist autonomously in the face of political power, make an equal relationship with political power and fellow citizens, and undertake responsible activities. Lastly, it is suggested that happy citizens should be able to understand the plurality of value-contents, the similarity of value-forms, and the possibility of value-realization, and then be equipped with self-respect, mutual respect, and law-respect.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2018.11a
• /
• pp.225-227
• /
• 2018

This research paper examines the history and present of 'temporary passengers' prescribed in Paragraph 9 of Article 5 of the Ships Safety Act Enforcement Regulations and suggests improvement plans referring to the examples of legislation of other countries. In 2015, Ministry of Ocean and Fisheries made authoritative interpretation that Paragraph 9 of Article 5 of the Ships Safety Act Enforcement Regulations, which prescribes special cargo drivers such as agricultural, marine or livestock vehicles as temporary passengers, is applied only to passenger ships and not to cargo ships such including Ro-Ro cargo ships. As the authoritative interpretation of the Ministry does not agree with not only the traditional interpretational methodology but also the interpretational methodology that are commonly used today, it lacks logical basis and looks unpersuasive. Paragraph 9 of Article 5 of the Ships Safety Act Enforcement Regulations can be applied not only on passenger ships but also on cargo ships. Also in case of Ro-Ro cargo ships, it is logically contradictory and against fairness not to acknowledge special cargo vehicle drivers as temporary passengers when there is no problem with safe navigation and safety of passengers on board even when the sailor, the sailor's family and the ship owner may be acknowledged as temporary passengers. To avoid unnecessary disputes and lawsuits, improvement plans using theory of legislation through statutory reform is more desirable. Therefore, the P aragraph should be amended to "Supercargo who deals with cargo that requires special care due to the characteristics of the cargo, such as transportation vehicles for agricultural products, marine products, livestock, explosives or flammable materials (drivers can serve as supercargos)" to reflect the distinct characteristics of cargo and ship navigation in Korea including the current distribution system, while setting an objective standard based on common sense of ordinary people and not on arbitrary interpretation.