• Korean Journal of Forensic Psychology
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.23-52
• /
• 2022

In this study, focused group interviews with 24 incumbent judges were conducted on how they conceptualize public opinion and what attitude they take toward it in relation to judicial trials. The contents of the interviews were analyzed through grounded theory and topic modeling (STM). According to the grounded theory results, judges distinguished concepts such as social rules, socially accepted ideas, legal emotion, and public mood from public opinion, and subdivided public opinion into temporary and emotional reactions to specific legal cases and consistent attitudes toward law and policies. In addition, it was found that judges' attitudes toward public opinion and social norms differed depending on the type of cases or legal issues. Topic modeling results significantly corresponded to the grounded theory results. In this model, the effects of the types of cases dedicated to participants on topical prevalence were statistically significant.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2010.04a
• /
• pp.422-427
• /
• 2010

The judgement of 'Koreon Maritime Safety Tribunal'(KMST) influences criminal/civil trials, and thus the judgement must be decided very carefully. The Judge must bear in mind the Principle of Free Evaluation of Evidence is restricted by the admissibility of evidence, in dubio proreo and others. Also, empirical role must be used very carefully with strict proof. Therefore the reasons of the proof shall be expressed on the adjudication.

• 발명특허
• /
• v.17 no.3 s.193
• /
• pp.18-21
• /
• 1992

대법원은 지난 연말 특허청의 항고심결에 불복하는 자가 대법원에 상고할 수 있도록 규정한 특허법 제186조 제1항이 헌법 제101조 제1항 및 제27조 제1항에 위배된다는 주장에 대하여 이를 헌법 재판소에서 심판하여 달라는 취지의 위헌제청 결정을 내렸다. 위헌제청 신천인의 주장을 보면, 행정부인 특허청 항고심판소에서 특허심판을 수행하고 있는 것은 법관에 의한 재판 받을 권리를 규정한 헌법에 배치되며, 도한 사실심에 관해 항고심판이 최종심이 되므로 사법권은

• 발명특허
• /
• v.17 no.2 s.192
• /
• pp.30-33
• /
• 1992

대법원은 지난 연말 특허청의 항고심결에 불복하는 자가 대법원에 상고할 수 있도록 규정한 특허법 제186조 제1항이 헌법 제101조 제1항 및 제27조 제1항에 위배된다는 주장에 대하여 이를 헌법 재판소에서 심판하여 달라는 취지의 위헌제청 결정을 내렸다. 위헌제청 신천인의 주장을 보면, 행정부인 특허청 항고심판소에서 특허심판을 수행하고 있는 것은 법관에 의한 재판 받을 권리를 규정한 헌법에 배치되며, 도한 사실심에 관해 항고심판이 최종심이 되므로 사법권은

• Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
• /
• v.19 no.7
• /
• pp.151-159
• /
• 2014

Sometimes, the misjudgement of imperfect human can not be avoided because capital punishment is decided by a judicial officer, human. Dreiinstanzen system has been adopted to prevent misjudgement. However the possibility of misjudgement can not be entirely excluded in the judgement by a judicial officer as the judgement of a lower court and a higher tribunal depends on the specific criminal cases. And in case of capital punishment executed by misjudgement, it leads to a cruelty result which has not ways to recover the damage. There is an opinion that dangerousness of misjudgement is lacking in persuasiveness because of insufficient demonstration for the abolition of capital punishment. However, also, there is an opinion that the abolition of capital punishment in case of misjudgement is persuasive with reality. In this case, even if other punishments are discussed separately, once capital punishment is executed, it can be irrevocable unjustice because a nation itself commits a crime. According to this, I would like to find out causes of misjudgement in the criminal justice system through the cases of advanced countries, such as United states, Japan, which are rich in studies and case analysis related to misjudgement, and introduce their efforts to prevent misjudgement in this paper.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology
• /
• v.30 no.3
• /
• pp.417-428
• /
• 2020

With the rapid development of information and communication technology, mobile devices have become an essential tool in our lives. Mobile devices are used as important evidence in criminal proof, as they accumulate data simultaneously with PIM functions while working with users most of the time. The mobile forensics is a procedure for obtaining digital evidence from mobile devices and should be collected and analyzed in accordance with due process, just like other evidence, and the integrity of the evidence is essential because it has aspects that are easy to manipulate and delete. Also, the adoption of evidence relies on the judges' liberalism, which necessitates the presentation of generalized procedures. In this paper, a mobile forensics model is presented to ensure integrity through the generalization of procedures. It is expected that the proposed mobile forensics model will contribute to the formation of judges by ensuring the reliability and authenticity of evidence.

• Korean Journal of Legislative Studies
• /
• v.22 no.2
• /
• pp.157-188
• /
• 2016

Since democratic transition in the early 1990s, constitutionalism is getting more important for democratic consolidation in Africa. Using Afribarometer data set, this paper explains influences on public confidence in judiciary. High levels of public trust in judiciary is a necessary condition for judicial system to work effectively in emerging democracy. Unlike existing studies focusing on the function of judiciary and legal procedures, this paper is interested in the relationship between how ordinary Africans perceive the attitudes of the chief executive toward judiciary, the rule of law, and judicial corruption and their confidence in judiciary. The results show that those who think that the chief executive is likely to respect the constitution and the judiciary, that the law applies to everyone equally, and that there are few corrupt judicial personnel are likely to show high levels of confidence in judiciary. This study argues that the tension between laws and politics have a significant influence on transitional justice in emerging democracy.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2005.08a
• /
• pp.327-334
• /
• 2005

본 연구는 법학계와 법조계의 법률정보 유통 촉진을 위한 체제분석과 발전방안 제시를 위하여 국내 ${\cdot}$ 외 선진사례를 조사하고 구체적인 방안을 마련하고자 하였다. 이를 위한 설문조사는 법률관련 학회개최정보를 중심으로 법관, 검사, 변호사, 법학교수 등 387명이 설문조사에 응답하였다. 설문조사 결과 학회개최정보 수집과 파악의 어려운 것으로 나타났으며 법조계와 법학계의 정보교류를 통하여 법률정보 유통 촉진을 종합적으로 제공할 수 있는 법률정보 유통센터 설립의 필요한 것으로 나타났다.

• 한국IT서비스학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2005.11a
• /
• pp.121-129
• /
• 2005

미래의 기술 혁명은 유비쿼터스 컴퓨팅 환경을 만들어낼 것이다. 본 연구는 유비쿼터스 컴퓨팅이 네트워크와 연계되면서 더욱 복잡해지고 있으나, 대부분의 시스템 중심의 연구가 단순한 '성능' 또는 '효율성'에만 치우져있는 문제점을 지적한다. 예를 들면, 프라이버시 관련 연구들은 개인정보의 처리에 있어서 프로토콜과 암호학적 기술에만 초점이 맞추어져 있다. 둘째로 본 연구에서는 법은 인간의 관리 아래에 기술을 둘 수 있거나 조정할 수 있다는 법관련 연구자들이 가진 고찰의 문제점을 지적한다. 따라서 오늘날 문제의 복잡성으로 인하여 새로운 프라이버시 관련 연구는 법, 기술, 경제, 규범 등에 대한 통합적인 사고가 필요한 종합적인 해결방안에 근거해야 한다. 본 연구는 유비쿼터스 컴퓨팅 환경에서의 프라이버시에 대하여 분석하고 프라이버시와 관련된 문제에 대한 종합적인 보호에 대해 분석할 것이다. 본 연구를 통해 유비쿼터스 컴퓨팅 환경에 프라이버시에 관한 새로운 고찰을 제시하고 유비쿼터스 컴퓨팅 환경에 영향을 받은 프라이버시의 개념을 재설정하는 메커니즘을 도출한다.

• The Korean Society of Law and Medicine
• /
• v.17 no.2
• /
• pp.3-28
• /
• 2016

While product liability has been settled as a technical term in civil law, criminal law does not commonly accept technical term for it. Not like civil law, product liability in criminal law point outs individual responsibility and disability of normative order. Meaning that causation between individual's action of violation of duty and the result of danger of legal interest or infringement of legal interest must be proved. In criminal law excluding "non-result-constituted crimes (Unternehmensdelikt)", charge of injuring, accidental infliction of injury, homicide or involuntary manslaughter is problematic in product liability. Of course, it is necessary to distinguish whether the action related to the outcome is act or ommission. Also the causal relationship between the action and the result must be proved, and the intention or negligence should be recognized. In this paper, it analyzes cases that were problematic in Korea, Germany, Spain, etc. Mainly focusing on the problems revealed in the determination of causal relationship, especially recognizing criminal liability related to products. Furthermore it is followed by the view of reviewing the cause-and-effect relationship by 2 steps, dividing natural scientific causation and the normative causal relationship. In this process, to acknowledge criminal product liability in accordance with recognizing cause-and-effect relationship, there should be general risk of specific substance causing the outcome. This only premise can be meaningful to examine the casual relationship from specific cases. As it shows in some cases and theories, it is not contradicting general law of cause and effect by determining specific causal relationship by free evaluation of evidence if a general causal relationship does not exist. Also since judge's testimony does not hold a dominant position from rule of thumb, it is possible to recognize specific causal relationship. However this paper takes position that if there is no objective and reasonably undeniable cause and effect law. If there is no objective and reasonably undeniable causal law, which is the premise for recognizing concrete causal relations, judge should sentence guilty according to "in dubio pro reo" principle. In addition, it is not allowed for the defendant to burden unproven fact by free evaluation of evidence which has an effect of shift of burden of proof.